Message ID | 20230922111247.497-2-ansuelsmth@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | [net-next,1/3] net: introduce napi_is_scheduled helper | expand |
On Fri, 2023-09-22 at 13:12 +0200, Christian Marangi wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c > index 9201ed778ebc..14bf6fae6662 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c > @@ -2994,13 +2994,25 @@ static void stmmac_tx_timer_arm(struct stmmac_priv *priv, u32 queue) > { > struct stmmac_tx_queue *tx_q = &priv->dma_conf.tx_queue[queue]; > u32 tx_coal_timer = priv->tx_coal_timer[queue]; > + struct stmmac_channel *ch; > + struct napi_struct *napi; > > > if (!tx_coal_timer) > return; > > > - hrtimer_start(&tx_q->txtimer, > - STMMAC_COAL_TIMER(tx_coal_timer), > - HRTIMER_MODE_REL); > + ch = &priv->channel[tx_q->queue_index]; > + napi = tx_q->xsk_pool ? &ch->rxtx_napi : &ch->tx_napi; > + > + /* Arm timer only if napi is not already scheduled. > + * Try to cancel any timer if napi is scheduled, timer will be armed > + * again in the next scheduled napi. > + */ > + if (unlikely(!napi_is_scheduled(napi))) > + hrtimer_start(&tx_q->txtimer, > + STMMAC_COAL_TIMER(tx_coal_timer), > + HRTIMER_MODE_REL); > + else > + hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&tx_q->txtimer); When this function is called from within the napi poll function (stmmac_tx_clean()), NAPI_STATE_SCHED will always be set and so after this patch the "We still have pending packets, let's call for a new scheduling" logic will never start the timer. Was that really intentional?
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 12:38:48PM +0000, Vincent Whitchurch wrote: > On Fri, 2023-09-22 at 13:12 +0200, Christian Marangi wrote: > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c > > index 9201ed778ebc..14bf6fae6662 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c > > @@ -2994,13 +2994,25 @@ static void stmmac_tx_timer_arm(struct stmmac_priv *priv, u32 queue) > > { > > struct stmmac_tx_queue *tx_q = &priv->dma_conf.tx_queue[queue]; > > u32 tx_coal_timer = priv->tx_coal_timer[queue]; > > + struct stmmac_channel *ch; > > + struct napi_struct *napi; > > > > > > if (!tx_coal_timer) > > return; > > > > > > - hrtimer_start(&tx_q->txtimer, > > - STMMAC_COAL_TIMER(tx_coal_timer), > > - HRTIMER_MODE_REL); > > + ch = &priv->channel[tx_q->queue_index]; > > + napi = tx_q->xsk_pool ? &ch->rxtx_napi : &ch->tx_napi; > > + > > + /* Arm timer only if napi is not already scheduled. > > + * Try to cancel any timer if napi is scheduled, timer will be armed > > + * again in the next scheduled napi. > > + */ > > + if (unlikely(!napi_is_scheduled(napi))) > > + hrtimer_start(&tx_q->txtimer, > > + STMMAC_COAL_TIMER(tx_coal_timer), > > + HRTIMER_MODE_REL); > > + else > > + hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&tx_q->txtimer); > > When this function is called from within the napi poll function > (stmmac_tx_clean()), NAPI_STATE_SCHED will always be set and so after > this patch the "We still have pending packets, let's call for a new > scheduling" logic will never start the timer. Was that really > intentional? > No and understanding the code flow of napi and tx-coal is hard... (also problem with tx coal arise only with real world scenario and now with synthetic tests like iperf. I will shortly send a v2 of this that will just move the logic of arming the TX timer outside napi call after DMA interrupt is enabled again. Currently testing the new version on openwrt with ipq806x hoping everything is good. (same perf increase observed but no queue timeout)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c index 9201ed778ebc..14bf6fae6662 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c @@ -2994,13 +2994,25 @@ static void stmmac_tx_timer_arm(struct stmmac_priv *priv, u32 queue) { struct stmmac_tx_queue *tx_q = &priv->dma_conf.tx_queue[queue]; u32 tx_coal_timer = priv->tx_coal_timer[queue]; + struct stmmac_channel *ch; + struct napi_struct *napi; if (!tx_coal_timer) return; - hrtimer_start(&tx_q->txtimer, - STMMAC_COAL_TIMER(tx_coal_timer), - HRTIMER_MODE_REL); + ch = &priv->channel[tx_q->queue_index]; + napi = tx_q->xsk_pool ? &ch->rxtx_napi : &ch->tx_napi; + + /* Arm timer only if napi is not already scheduled. + * Try to cancel any timer if napi is scheduled, timer will be armed + * again in the next scheduled napi. + */ + if (unlikely(!napi_is_scheduled(napi))) + hrtimer_start(&tx_q->txtimer, + STMMAC_COAL_TIMER(tx_coal_timer), + HRTIMER_MODE_REL); + else + hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&tx_q->txtimer); } /**
There is currently a problem with the TX timer getting armed multiple unnecessary times causing big performance regression on some device that suffer from heavy handling of hrtimer rearm. The use of the TX timer is an old implementation that predates the napi implementation and the interrupt enable/disable handling. Due to stmmac being a very old code, the TX timer was never evaluated again with this new implementation and was kept there causing performance regression. The performance regression started to appear with kernel version 4.19 with 8fce33317023 ("net: stmmac: Rework coalesce timer and fix multi-queue races") where the timer was reduced to 1ms causing it to be armed 40 times more than before. Decreasing the timer made the problem more present and caused the regression in the other of 600-700mbps on some device (regression where this was notice is ipq806x). The problem is in the fact that handling the hrtimer on some target is expensive and recent kernel made the timer armed much more times. A solution that was proposed was reverting the hrtimer change and use mod_timer but such solution would still hide the real problem in the current implementation. To fix the regression, apply some additional logic and skip arming the timer when not needed. Arm the timer ONLY if a napi is not already scheduled. Running the timer is redundant since the same function (stmmac_tx_clean) will run in the napi TX poll. Also try to cancel any timer if a napi is scheduled to prevent redundant run of TX call. With the following new logic the original performance are restored while keeping using the hrtimer. Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com> --- .../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 18 +++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)