| Message ID | 20230831130826.5592-3-peter.wang@mediatek.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Fix abnormal clock scaling behaviors | expand |
Hi Bart, This patch still need your review. Thanks. Peter On Thu, 2023-08-31 at 21:08 +0800, peter.wang@mediatek.com wrote: > From: Peter Wang <peter.wang@mediatek.com> > > When ufshcd_clk_scaling_suspend_work(Thread A) running and new > command > coming, ufshcd_clk_scaling_start_busy(Thread B) may get host_lock > after Thread A first time release host_lock. Then Thread A second > time > get host_lock will set clk_scaling.window_start_t = 0 which scale up > clock abnormal next polling_ms time. > Also inlines another __ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling calls. > > Below is racing step: > 1 hba->clk_scaling.suspend_work (Thread A) > ufshcd_clk_scaling_suspend_work > 2 spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, irq_flags); > 3 hba->clk_scaling.is_suspended = true; > 4 spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, > irq_flags); > __ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling > 7 spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags); > 8 hba->clk_scaling.window_start_t = 0; > 9 spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, > flags); > > ufshcd_send_command (Thread B) > ufshcd_clk_scaling_start_busy > 5 spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags); > .... > 6 spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, > flags); > > Signed-off-by: Peter Wang <peter.wang@mediatek.com> > --- > drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 17 ++++------------- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c > index e3672e55efae..057549b0e586 100644 > --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c > +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c > @@ -275,7 +275,6 @@ static inline void > ufshcd_add_delay_before_dme_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba); > static int ufshcd_host_reset_and_restore(struct ufs_hba *hba); > static void ufshcd_resume_clkscaling(struct ufs_hba *hba); > static void ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling(struct ufs_hba *hba); > -static void __ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling(struct ufs_hba *hba); > static int ufshcd_scale_clks(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool scale_up); > static irqreturn_t ufshcd_intr(int irq, void *__hba); > static int ufshcd_change_power_mode(struct ufs_hba *hba, > @@ -1385,9 +1384,10 @@ static void > ufshcd_clk_scaling_suspend_work(struct work_struct *work) > return; > } > hba->clk_scaling.is_suspended = true; > + hba->clk_scaling.window_start_t = 0; > spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, irq_flags); > > - __ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling(hba); > + devfreq_suspend_device(hba->devfreq); > } > > static void ufshcd_clk_scaling_resume_work(struct work_struct *work) > @@ -1564,16 +1564,6 @@ static void ufshcd_devfreq_remove(struct > ufs_hba *hba) > dev_pm_opp_remove(hba->dev, clki->max_freq); > } > > -static void __ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling(struct ufs_hba *hba) > -{ > - unsigned long flags; > - > - devfreq_suspend_device(hba->devfreq); > - spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags); > - hba->clk_scaling.window_start_t = 0; > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags); > -} > - > static void ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling(struct ufs_hba *hba) > { > unsigned long flags; > @@ -1586,11 +1576,12 @@ static void ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling(struct > ufs_hba *hba) > if (!hba->clk_scaling.is_suspended) { > suspend = true; > hba->clk_scaling.is_suspended = true; > + hba->clk_scaling.window_start_t = 0; > } > spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags); > > if (suspend) > - __ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling(hba); > + devfreq_suspend_device(hba->devfreq); > } > > static void ufshcd_resume_clkscaling(struct ufs_hba *hba)
On 10/13/23 02:42, Peter Wang (王信友) wrote:
> This patch still need your review.
Hi Peter,
Although I can see that patch 2/3 made it to lore.kernel.org, I did not receive
that patch in my mailbox. This probably was caused by an issue by the mailserver
I'm using. I will download the emails I'm missing from lore.kernel.org and review
these patches.
Thanks,
Bart.
On 8/31/23 06:08, peter.wang@mediatek.com wrote: > When ufshcd_clk_scaling_suspend_work(Thread A) running and new command > coming, ufshcd_clk_scaling_start_busy(Thread B) may get host_lock > after Thread A first time release host_lock. Then Thread A second time > get host_lock will set clk_scaling.window_start_t = 0 which scale up > clock abnormal next polling_ms time. > Also inlines another __ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling calls. Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
> On 8/31/23 06:08, peter.wang@mediatek.com wrote: >> When ufshcd_clk_scaling_suspend_work(Thread A) running and new command >> coming, ufshcd_clk_scaling_start_busy(Thread B) may get host_lock >> after Thread A first time release host_lock. Then Thread A second time >> get host_lock will set clk_scaling.window_start_t = 0 which scale up >> clock abnormal next polling_ms time. >> Also inlines another __ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling calls. > > Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Applied 1-3 to 6.7/scsi-staging, thanks!
diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c index e3672e55efae..057549b0e586 100644 --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c @@ -275,7 +275,6 @@ static inline void ufshcd_add_delay_before_dme_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba); static int ufshcd_host_reset_and_restore(struct ufs_hba *hba); static void ufshcd_resume_clkscaling(struct ufs_hba *hba); static void ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling(struct ufs_hba *hba); -static void __ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling(struct ufs_hba *hba); static int ufshcd_scale_clks(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool scale_up); static irqreturn_t ufshcd_intr(int irq, void *__hba); static int ufshcd_change_power_mode(struct ufs_hba *hba, @@ -1385,9 +1384,10 @@ static void ufshcd_clk_scaling_suspend_work(struct work_struct *work) return; } hba->clk_scaling.is_suspended = true; + hba->clk_scaling.window_start_t = 0; spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, irq_flags); - __ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling(hba); + devfreq_suspend_device(hba->devfreq); } static void ufshcd_clk_scaling_resume_work(struct work_struct *work) @@ -1564,16 +1564,6 @@ static void ufshcd_devfreq_remove(struct ufs_hba *hba) dev_pm_opp_remove(hba->dev, clki->max_freq); } -static void __ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling(struct ufs_hba *hba) -{ - unsigned long flags; - - devfreq_suspend_device(hba->devfreq); - spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags); - hba->clk_scaling.window_start_t = 0; - spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags); -} - static void ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling(struct ufs_hba *hba) { unsigned long flags; @@ -1586,11 +1576,12 @@ static void ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling(struct ufs_hba *hba) if (!hba->clk_scaling.is_suspended) { suspend = true; hba->clk_scaling.is_suspended = true; + hba->clk_scaling.window_start_t = 0; } spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags); if (suspend) - __ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling(hba); + devfreq_suspend_device(hba->devfreq); } static void ufshcd_resume_clkscaling(struct ufs_hba *hba)