Message ID | 20231016095217.37574-1-nsaenz@amazon.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | KVM: x86: hyper-v: Don't auto-enable stimer during deserialization | expand |
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@amazon.com> writes: > By not honoring the 'stimer->config.enable' state during stimer > deserialization we might introduce spurious timer interrupts. For > example through the following events: > - The stimer is configured in auto-enable mode. > - The stimer's count is set and the timer enabled. > - The stimer expires, an interrupt is injected. > - We live migrate the VM. > - The stimer config and count are deserialized, auto-enable is ON, the > stimer is re-enabled. > - The stimer expires right away, and injects an unwarranted interrupt. > > So let's not change the stimer's enable state if the MSR write comes > from user-space. > > Fixes: 1f4b34f825e8 ("kvm/x86: Hyper-V SynIC timers") > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@amazon.com> > --- > arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c > index 7c2dac6824e2..9f1deb6aa131 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c > @@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ static int stimer_set_count(struct kvm_vcpu_hv_stimer *stimer, u64 count, > stimer->count = count; > if (stimer->count == 0) > stimer->config.enable = 0; Can this branch be problematic too? E.g. if STIMER[X]_CONFIG is deserialized after STIMER[X]_COUNT we may erroneously reset 'enable' to 0, right? In fact, when MSRs are ordered like this: #define HV_X64_MSR_STIMER0_CONFIG 0x400000B0 #define HV_X64_MSR_STIMER0_COUNT 0x400000B1 I would guess that we always de-serialize 'config' first. With auto-enable, the timer will get enabled when writing 'count' but what happens in other cases? Maybe the whole block needs to go under 'if (!host)' instead? > - else if (stimer->config.auto_enable) > + else if (stimer->config.auto_enable && !host) > stimer->config.enable = 1; > > if (stimer->config.enable)
Hi Vitaly, On Mon Oct 16, 2023 at 12:14 PM UTC, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@amazon.com> writes: > > > By not honoring the 'stimer->config.enable' state during stimer > > deserialization we might introduce spurious timer interrupts. For > > example through the following events: > > - The stimer is configured in auto-enable mode. > > - The stimer's count is set and the timer enabled. > > - The stimer expires, an interrupt is injected. > > - We live migrate the VM. > > - The stimer config and count are deserialized, auto-enable is ON, the > > stimer is re-enabled. > > - The stimer expires right away, and injects an unwarranted interrupt. > > > > So let's not change the stimer's enable state if the MSR write comes > > from user-space. > > > > Fixes: 1f4b34f825e8 ("kvm/x86: Hyper-V SynIC timers") > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@amazon.com> > > --- > > arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c > > index 7c2dac6824e2..9f1deb6aa131 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c > > @@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ static int stimer_set_count(struct kvm_vcpu_hv_stimer *stimer, u64 count, > > stimer->count = count; > > if (stimer->count == 0) > > stimer->config.enable = 0; > > Can this branch be problematic too? E.g. if STIMER[X]_CONFIG is > deserialized after STIMER[X]_COUNT we may erroneously reset 'enable' to > 0, right? In fact, when MSRs are ordered like this: > > #define HV_X64_MSR_STIMER0_CONFIG 0x400000B0 > #define HV_X64_MSR_STIMER0_COUNT 0x400000B1 > > I would guess that we always de-serialize 'config' first. With > auto-enable, the timer will get enabled when writing 'count' but what > happens in other cases? > > Maybe the whole block needs to go under 'if (!host)' instead? In either case, with 'enable == 1' && 'count == 0' we'll reset the timer in 'kvm_hv_process_stimers()'. So it's unlikely to cause any weirdness. That said, I think covering both cases is more correct. Will send a v2. Nicolas
I'd prefer the shortlog be more explicit about the write coming from userspace, e.g. KVM: x86: hyper-v: Don't auto-enable stimer on write from userspace A non-zero number of KVM's "deserialization" ioctls are used to stuff state without a paired "serialization". I doubt anyone is doing that with the Hyper-V ioctls, but keeping things consistent is helpful for readers. On Mon, Oct 16, 2023, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: > Hi Vitaly, > > On Mon Oct 16, 2023 at 12:14 PM UTC, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > > Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@amazon.com> writes: > > > > > By not honoring the 'stimer->config.enable' state during stimer > > > deserialization we might introduce spurious timer interrupts. For Avoid pronouns please. > > > example through the following events: > > > - The stimer is configured in auto-enable mode. > > > - The stimer's count is set and the timer enabled. > > > - The stimer expires, an interrupt is injected. > > > - We live migrate the VM. Same here. "We" is already ambiguous, because the first usage is largely about KVM, and the second usage here is much more about userspace and/or the actual user. > > > - The stimer config and count are deserialized, auto-enable is ON, the > > > stimer is re-enabled. > > > - The stimer expires right away, and injects an unwarranted interrupt. > > > > > > So let's not change the stimer's enable state if the MSR write comes > > > from user-space. Don't hedge, firmly state what the patch does and why the change is necessary and correct. If it turns out the change is wrong, then the follow-up patch can explain the situation. But in the happy case where the change is correct, using language that isn't assertive can result in > > > Fixes: 1f4b34f825e8 ("kvm/x86: Hyper-V SynIC timers") Does this need a? Cc: stable@vger.kernel > > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@amazon.com> > > > --- > > > arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c > > > index 7c2dac6824e2..9f1deb6aa131 100644 > > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c > > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c > > > @@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ static int stimer_set_count(struct kvm_vcpu_hv_stimer *stimer, u64 count, > > > stimer->count = count; > > > if (stimer->count == 0) > > > stimer->config.enable = 0; > > > > Can this branch be problematic too? E.g. if STIMER[X]_CONFIG is > > deserialized after STIMER[X]_COUNT we may erroneously reset 'enable' to > > 0, right? In fact, when MSRs are ordered like this: > > > > #define HV_X64_MSR_STIMER0_CONFIG 0x400000B0 > > #define HV_X64_MSR_STIMER0_COUNT 0x400000B1 > > > > I would guess that we always de-serialize 'config' first. With > > auto-enable, the timer will get enabled when writing 'count' but what > > happens in other cases? > > > > Maybe the whole block needs to go under 'if (!host)' instead? > > In either case, with 'enable == 1' && 'count == 0' we'll reset the timer > in 'kvm_hv_process_stimers()'. So it's unlikely to cause any weirdness. > That said, I think covering both cases is more correct. Will send a v2. Agreed, I think it needs to be all or nothing, i.e. either process all side effects of writing the count, or don't process any.
Hi Sean, On Mon Oct 16, 2023 at 4:27 PM UTC, Sean Christopherson wrote: > I'd prefer the shortlog be more explicit about the write coming from userspace, e.g. > > KVM: x86: hyper-v: Don't auto-enable stimer on write from userspace > > A non-zero number of KVM's "deserialization" ioctls are used to stuff state > without a paired "serialization". I doubt anyone is doing that with the Hyper-V > ioctls, but keeping things consistent is helpful for readers. > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: > > Hi Vitaly, > > > > On Mon Oct 16, 2023 at 12:14 PM UTC, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > > > Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@amazon.com> writes: > > > > > > > By not honoring the 'stimer->config.enable' state during stimer > > > > deserialization we might introduce spurious timer interrupts. For > > Avoid pronouns please. > > > > > example through the following events: > > > > - The stimer is configured in auto-enable mode. > > > > - The stimer's count is set and the timer enabled. > > > > - The stimer expires, an interrupt is injected. > > > > - We live migrate the VM. > > Same here. "We" is already ambiguous, because the first usage is largely about > KVM, and the second usage here is much more about userspace and/or the actual > user. > > > > > - The stimer config and count are deserialized, auto-enable is ON, the > > > > stimer is re-enabled. > > > > - The stimer expires right away, and injects an unwarranted interrupt. > > > > > > > > So let's not change the stimer's enable state if the MSR write comes > > > > from user-space. > > Don't hedge, firmly state what the patch does and why the change is necessary > and correct. If it turns out the change is wrong, then the follow-up patch can > explain the situation. But in the happy case where the change is correct, using > language that isn't assertive can result in > > > > > Fixes: 1f4b34f825e8 ("kvm/x86: Hyper-V SynIC timers") > > Does this need a? > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel Your reply raced with my v2. I'll rework the commit message, and send a third revision. Nicolas
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c index 7c2dac6824e2..9f1deb6aa131 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c @@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ static int stimer_set_count(struct kvm_vcpu_hv_stimer *stimer, u64 count, stimer->count = count; if (stimer->count == 0) stimer->config.enable = 0; - else if (stimer->config.auto_enable) + else if (stimer->config.auto_enable && !host) stimer->config.enable = 1; if (stimer->config.enable)
By not honoring the 'stimer->config.enable' state during stimer deserialization we might introduce spurious timer interrupts. For example through the following events: - The stimer is configured in auto-enable mode. - The stimer's count is set and the timer enabled. - The stimer expires, an interrupt is injected. - We live migrate the VM. - The stimer config and count are deserialized, auto-enable is ON, the stimer is re-enabled. - The stimer expires right away, and injects an unwarranted interrupt. So let's not change the stimer's enable state if the MSR write comes from user-space. Fixes: 1f4b34f825e8 ("kvm/x86: Hyper-V SynIC timers") Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@amazon.com> --- arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)