diff mbox series

[RFC,3/7] migration: multifd_send_kick_main()

Message ID 20231022201211.452861-4-peterx@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series migration/multifd: quit unitifications and separate sync packet | expand

Commit Message

Peter Xu Oct. 22, 2023, 8:12 p.m. UTC
When a multifd sender thread hit errors, it always needs to kick the main
thread by kicking all the semaphores that it can be waiting upon.

Provide a helper for it and deduplicate the code.

Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 migration/multifd.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Fabiano Rosas Oct. 23, 2023, 2:43 p.m. UTC | #1
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:

> When a multifd sender thread hit errors, it always needs to kick the main
> thread by kicking all the semaphores that it can be waiting upon.
>
> Provide a helper for it and deduplicate the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Fabiano Rosas Nov. 8, 2023, 10:49 p.m. UTC | #2
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:

> When a multifd sender thread hit errors, it always needs to kick the main
> thread by kicking all the semaphores that it can be waiting upon.
>
> Provide a helper for it and deduplicate the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> ---
>  migration/multifd.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/migration/multifd.c b/migration/multifd.c
> index 4afdd88602..33fb21d0e4 100644
> --- a/migration/multifd.c
> +++ b/migration/multifd.c
> @@ -374,6 +374,18 @@ struct {
>      MultiFDMethods *ops;
>  } *multifd_send_state;
>  
> +/*
> + * The migration thread can wait on either of the two semaphores.  This
> + * function can be used to kick the main thread out of waiting on either of
> + * them.  Should mostly only be called when something wrong happened with
> + * the current multifd send thread.
> + */
> +static void multifd_send_kick_main(MultiFDSendParams *p)
> +{
> +    qemu_sem_post(&p->sem_sync);
> +    qemu_sem_post(&multifd_send_state->channels_ready);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * How we use multifd_send_state->pages and channel->pages?
>   *
> @@ -746,8 +758,7 @@ out:
>          assert(local_err);
>          trace_multifd_send_error(p->id);
>          multifd_send_terminate_threads(local_err);
> -        qemu_sem_post(&p->sem_sync);
> -        qemu_sem_post(&multifd_send_state->channels_ready);
> +        multifd_send_kick_main(p);
>          error_free(local_err);
>      }
>  
> @@ -787,8 +798,7 @@ static void multifd_tls_outgoing_handshake(QIOTask *task,
>       * is not created, and then tell who pay attention to me.
>       */
>      p->quit = true;
> -    qemu_sem_post(&multifd_send_state->channels_ready);
> -    qemu_sem_post(&p->sem_sync);
> +    multifd_send_kick_main(p);

There's a bug here in the original code:

It's not really safe to call any of these outside of the channel lock
because multifd_save_cleanup() could execute at the same time and call
qemu_sem_destroy() -> qemu_mutex_destroy(), which can assert because we
might be holding the sem_lock.

It seems the reason we get away with this today is merely due to
timing. A subset of this problem was already encountered here:

[PATCH] migrate/multifd: fix coredump when the multifd thread cleanup
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230621081826.3203053-1-zhangjianguo18@huawei.com

We could probably release the semaphores for all channels at once inside
multifd_save_cleanup() in the main thread. We'd have a
multifd_send_kick_main() in each channel when it fails and this:

void multifd_save_cleanup(void)
{
    ...   
    for (i = 0; i < migrate_multifd_channels(); i++) {
        MultiFDSendParams *p = &multifd_send_state->params[i];

        if (p->running) {
            qemu_thread_join(&p->thread);
        } else {
            multifd_send_kick_main(p);
        }
    }
    for (i = 0; i < migrate_multifd_channels(); i++) {
        qemu_sem_destroy, etc...
    }
    ...
}
Peter Xu Nov. 9, 2023, 4:50 p.m. UTC | #3
On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 07:49:53PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> > When a multifd sender thread hit errors, it always needs to kick the main
> > thread by kicking all the semaphores that it can be waiting upon.
> >
> > Provide a helper for it and deduplicate the code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  migration/multifd.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/migration/multifd.c b/migration/multifd.c
> > index 4afdd88602..33fb21d0e4 100644
> > --- a/migration/multifd.c
> > +++ b/migration/multifd.c
> > @@ -374,6 +374,18 @@ struct {
> >      MultiFDMethods *ops;
> >  } *multifd_send_state;
> >  
> > +/*
> > + * The migration thread can wait on either of the two semaphores.  This
> > + * function can be used to kick the main thread out of waiting on either of
> > + * them.  Should mostly only be called when something wrong happened with
> > + * the current multifd send thread.
> > + */
> > +static void multifd_send_kick_main(MultiFDSendParams *p)
> > +{
> > +    qemu_sem_post(&p->sem_sync);
> > +    qemu_sem_post(&multifd_send_state->channels_ready);
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * How we use multifd_send_state->pages and channel->pages?
> >   *
> > @@ -746,8 +758,7 @@ out:
> >          assert(local_err);
> >          trace_multifd_send_error(p->id);
> >          multifd_send_terminate_threads(local_err);
> > -        qemu_sem_post(&p->sem_sync);
> > -        qemu_sem_post(&multifd_send_state->channels_ready);
> > +        multifd_send_kick_main(p);
> >          error_free(local_err);
> >      }
> >  
> > @@ -787,8 +798,7 @@ static void multifd_tls_outgoing_handshake(QIOTask *task,
> >       * is not created, and then tell who pay attention to me.
> >       */
> >      p->quit = true;
> > -    qemu_sem_post(&multifd_send_state->channels_ready);
> > -    qemu_sem_post(&p->sem_sync);
> > +    multifd_send_kick_main(p);
> 
> There's a bug here in the original code:
> 
> It's not really safe to call any of these outside of the channel lock
> because multifd_save_cleanup() could execute at the same time and call
> qemu_sem_destroy() -> qemu_mutex_destroy(), which can assert because we
> might be holding the sem_lock.

If you meant "p->mutex" as the "channel lock", IIUC even holding that won't
work? Because it'll also be freed in multifd_save_cleanup().



> 
> It seems the reason we get away with this today is merely due to
> timing. A subset of this problem was already encountered here:
> 
> [PATCH] migrate/multifd: fix coredump when the multifd thread cleanup
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230621081826.3203053-1-zhangjianguo18@huawei.com
> 
> We could probably release the semaphores for all channels at once inside
> multifd_save_cleanup() in the main thread. We'd have a
> multifd_send_kick_main() in each channel when it fails and this:
> 
> void multifd_save_cleanup(void)
> {
>     ...   
>     for (i = 0; i < migrate_multifd_channels(); i++) {
>         MultiFDSendParams *p = &multifd_send_state->params[i];
> 
>         if (p->running) {
>             qemu_thread_join(&p->thread);
>         } else {
>             multifd_send_kick_main(p);
>         }
>     }
>     for (i = 0; i < migrate_multifd_channels(); i++) {
>         qemu_sem_destroy, etc...
>     }
>     ...
> }    
>
Fabiano Rosas Nov. 9, 2023, 5 p.m. UTC | #4
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:

> On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 07:49:53PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>> Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:
>> 
>> > When a multifd sender thread hit errors, it always needs to kick the main
>> > thread by kicking all the semaphores that it can be waiting upon.
>> >
>> > Provide a helper for it and deduplicate the code.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
>> > ---
>> >  migration/multifd.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
>> >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/migration/multifd.c b/migration/multifd.c
>> > index 4afdd88602..33fb21d0e4 100644
>> > --- a/migration/multifd.c
>> > +++ b/migration/multifd.c
>> > @@ -374,6 +374,18 @@ struct {
>> >      MultiFDMethods *ops;
>> >  } *multifd_send_state;
>> >  
>> > +/*
>> > + * The migration thread can wait on either of the two semaphores.  This
>> > + * function can be used to kick the main thread out of waiting on either of
>> > + * them.  Should mostly only be called when something wrong happened with
>> > + * the current multifd send thread.
>> > + */
>> > +static void multifd_send_kick_main(MultiFDSendParams *p)
>> > +{
>> > +    qemu_sem_post(&p->sem_sync);
>> > +    qemu_sem_post(&multifd_send_state->channels_ready);
>> > +}
>> > +
>> >  /*
>> >   * How we use multifd_send_state->pages and channel->pages?
>> >   *
>> > @@ -746,8 +758,7 @@ out:
>> >          assert(local_err);
>> >          trace_multifd_send_error(p->id);
>> >          multifd_send_terminate_threads(local_err);
>> > -        qemu_sem_post(&p->sem_sync);
>> > -        qemu_sem_post(&multifd_send_state->channels_ready);
>> > +        multifd_send_kick_main(p);
>> >          error_free(local_err);
>> >      }
>> >  
>> > @@ -787,8 +798,7 @@ static void multifd_tls_outgoing_handshake(QIOTask *task,
>> >       * is not created, and then tell who pay attention to me.
>> >       */
>> >      p->quit = true;
>> > -    qemu_sem_post(&multifd_send_state->channels_ready);
>> > -    qemu_sem_post(&p->sem_sync);
>> > +    multifd_send_kick_main(p);
>> 
>> There's a bug here in the original code:
>> 
>> It's not really safe to call any of these outside of the channel lock
>> because multifd_save_cleanup() could execute at the same time and call
>> qemu_sem_destroy() -> qemu_mutex_destroy(), which can assert because we
>> might be holding the sem_lock.
>
> If you meant "p->mutex" as the "channel lock", IIUC even holding that won't
> work? Because it'll also be freed in multifd_save_cleanup().
>

You're right, I just sent an RFC about this, please take a look.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/migration/multifd.c b/migration/multifd.c
index 4afdd88602..33fb21d0e4 100644
--- a/migration/multifd.c
+++ b/migration/multifd.c
@@ -374,6 +374,18 @@  struct {
     MultiFDMethods *ops;
 } *multifd_send_state;
 
+/*
+ * The migration thread can wait on either of the two semaphores.  This
+ * function can be used to kick the main thread out of waiting on either of
+ * them.  Should mostly only be called when something wrong happened with
+ * the current multifd send thread.
+ */
+static void multifd_send_kick_main(MultiFDSendParams *p)
+{
+    qemu_sem_post(&p->sem_sync);
+    qemu_sem_post(&multifd_send_state->channels_ready);
+}
+
 /*
  * How we use multifd_send_state->pages and channel->pages?
  *
@@ -746,8 +758,7 @@  out:
         assert(local_err);
         trace_multifd_send_error(p->id);
         multifd_send_terminate_threads(local_err);
-        qemu_sem_post(&p->sem_sync);
-        qemu_sem_post(&multifd_send_state->channels_ready);
+        multifd_send_kick_main(p);
         error_free(local_err);
     }
 
@@ -787,8 +798,7 @@  static void multifd_tls_outgoing_handshake(QIOTask *task,
      * is not created, and then tell who pay attention to me.
      */
     p->quit = true;
-    qemu_sem_post(&multifd_send_state->channels_ready);
-    qemu_sem_post(&p->sem_sync);
+    multifd_send_kick_main(p);
     error_free(err);
 }
 
@@ -859,8 +869,7 @@  static void multifd_new_send_channel_cleanup(MultiFDSendParams *p,
 {
      migrate_set_error(migrate_get_current(), err);
      /* Error happen, we need to tell who pay attention to me */
-     qemu_sem_post(&multifd_send_state->channels_ready);
-     qemu_sem_post(&p->sem_sync);
+     multifd_send_kick_main(p);
      /*
       * Although multifd_send_thread is not created, but main migration
       * thread need to judge whether it is running, so we need to mark