Message ID | pull.1604.git.1698680732691.gitgitgadget@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | tests: handle "funny" exit code 127 produced by MSVC-compiled exes | expand |
On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 03:45:32PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget wrote: > Now, `jk/tree-name-and-depth-limit` introduces a pair of test cases that > expect a command that produces a stack overflow to fail, which it > typically does with exit code 139 (which means SIGSEGV). I think you're misinterpreting the purpose of the tests from that series; they're not intended to segfault. Quoting from t6700: # We'll test against two depths here: a small one that will let us check the # behavior of the config setting easily, and a large one that should be # forbidden by default. Testing the default depth will let us know whether our # default is enough to prevent segfaults on systems that run the tests. So for the "big tree" tests in that file, we are looking for a controlled failure rather than a segfault. And indeed, the end of that series already lowered the default to accommodate the msys windows build; see the discussion in 4d5693ba05 (lower core.maxTreeDepth default to 2048, 2023-08-31). So I think the test is working as designed here: it is showing us that the default value is not sufficient to protect MSVC builds from running out of stack space. There are a few options there: 1. We can lower the default everywhere. 2. We can lower it just for MSVC builds. 3. We can accept the situation and skip the tests for that build. There's a bit more discussion in the commit I referenced above. > Let's work around this by: > > 1) recording which C compiler was used, and > > 2) adding an MSVC-only exception to `test_must_fail` to treat 127 as a > regular failure. > > There is a slight downside of this approach in that a real missing > command could be mistaken for a failure. However, this would be caught > on other platforms, and besides, we use `test_must_fail` only for `git` > and `scalar` anymore, and we can be pretty certain that both are there. I think there is another much worse downside to your patch: we will stop noticing when MSVC builds segfault in the tests. The purpose of test_must_fail is to allow controlled and expected failure returns from the command, but still report on unexpected situations (signal death, command not found, and so on). -Peff
diff --git a/contrib/buildsystems/CMakeLists.txt b/contrib/buildsystems/CMakeLists.txt index 6b819e2fbdf..e164484be98 100644 --- a/contrib/buildsystems/CMakeLists.txt +++ b/contrib/buildsystems/CMakeLists.txt @@ -1057,7 +1057,8 @@ if(NOT PYTHON_TESTS) set(NO_PYTHON 1) endif() -file(WRITE ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/GIT-BUILD-OPTIONS "SHELL_PATH='${SHELL_PATH}'\n") +file(WRITE ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/GIT-BUILD-OPTIONS "CMAKE_C_COMPILER='${CMAKE_C_COMPILER}'\n") +file(APPEND ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/GIT-BUILD-OPTIONS "SHELL_PATH='${SHELL_PATH}'\n") file(APPEND ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/GIT-BUILD-OPTIONS "TEST_SHELL_PATH='${TEST_SHELL_PATH}'\n") file(APPEND ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/GIT-BUILD-OPTIONS "PERL_PATH='${PERL_PATH}'\n") file(APPEND ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/GIT-BUILD-OPTIONS "DIFF='${DIFF}'\n") diff --git a/t/test-lib-functions.sh b/t/test-lib-functions.sh index 2f8868caa17..ee19c748973 100644 --- a/t/test-lib-functions.sh +++ b/t/test-lib-functions.sh @@ -1112,6 +1112,9 @@ test_must_fail () { return 1 elif test $exit_code -eq 127 then + # Work-around for MSVC-compiled executables + case "$CMAKE_C_COMPILER" in *MSVC*) return 0;; esac + echo >&4 "test_must_fail: command not found: $*" return 1 elif test $exit_code -eq 126