diff mbox series

[2/6] mtd: spi-nor: add erase die (chip) capability

Message ID 20231101094325.95851-3-tudor.ambarus@linaro.org (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series mtd: spi-nor: introduce die erase | expand

Commit Message

Tudor Ambarus Nov. 1, 2023, 9:43 a.m. UTC
JESD216 defines a chip as a die, one and the other are the same thing.
JESD216 clarifies that the chip erase time defined in BFPT dword(11)
applies separately to each die for multi-die devices in which the dice
are individually accessed. Based on this, update the
spi_nor_erase_chip() method to support multi-die devices.

For now, benefit of the die erase when addr and len are aligned with die
size. This could be improved however for the uniform and non-uniform
erases cases to use the die erase when possible. For example if one
requests that an erase of a 2 die device starting from the last 64KB of
the first die to the end of the flash size, we could use just 2
commands, a 64KB erase and a die erase. This improvement is left as an
exercise for the reader, as I don't have multi die flashes at hand.

Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c    | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
 drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.h    |  6 ++++--
 drivers/mtd/spi-nor/debugfs.c |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Tudor Ambarus Nov. 1, 2023, 9:48 a.m. UTC | #1
On 01.11.2023 11:43, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> JESD216 defines a chip as a die, one and the other are the same thing.
> JESD216 clarifies that the chip erase time defined in BFPT dword(11)
> applies separately to each die for multi-die devices in which the dice
> are individually accessed. Based on this, update the
> spi_nor_erase_chip() method to support multi-die devices.
> 
> For now, benefit of the die erase when addr and len are aligned with die
> size. This could be improved however for the uniform and non-uniform
> erases cases to use the die erase when possible. For example if one
> requests that an erase of a 2 die device starting from the last 64KB of
> the first die to the end of the flash size, we could use just 2
> commands, a 64KB erase and a die erase. This improvement is left as an
> exercise for the reader, as I don't have multi die flashes at hand.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c    | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
>  drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.h    |  6 ++++--
>  drivers/mtd/spi-nor/debugfs.c |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> index 25a64c65717d..360fce7ffe82 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> @@ -1067,17 +1067,21 @@ static int spi_nor_read_sr2(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 *sr2)
>   */
>  static int spi_nor_erase_chip(struct spi_nor *nor)
>  {
> +	u8 opcode = nor->params->chip_erase_opcode;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	dev_dbg(nor->dev, " %lldKiB\n", (long long)(nor->mtd.size >> 10));
>  
>  	if (nor->spimem) {
> -		struct spi_mem_op op = SPI_NOR_CHIP_ERASE_OP;
> +		struct spi_mem_op op = SPI_NOR_CHIP_ERASE_OP(opcode);
>  
>  		spi_nor_spimem_setup_op(nor, &op, nor->reg_proto);
>  
>  		ret = spi_mem_exec_op(nor->spimem, &op);
>  	} else {
> +		if (opcode != SPINOR_OP_CHIP_ERASE)
> +			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
>  		ret = spi_nor_controller_ops_write_reg(nor,
>  						       SPINOR_OP_CHIP_ERASE,
>  						       NULL, 0);
> @@ -1799,7 +1803,10 @@ static int spi_nor_erase_multi_sectors(struct spi_nor *nor, u64 addr, u32 len)
>  static int spi_nor_erase(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct erase_info *instr)
>  {
>  	struct spi_nor *nor = mtd_to_spi_nor(mtd);
> +	u8 n_dice = nor->params->n_dice;
> +	bool die_erase = false;
>  	u32 addr, len, rem;
> +	size_t die_size;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	dev_dbg(nor->dev, "at 0x%llx, len %lld\n", (long long)instr->addr,
> @@ -1814,12 +1821,18 @@ static int spi_nor_erase(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct erase_info *instr)
>  	addr = instr->addr;
>  	len = instr->len;
>  
> +	if (n_dice) {
> +		die_size = div_u64(mtd->size, n_dice);
> +		if (len == die_size && (addr & (die_size - 1)))
> +			die_erase = true;
> +	}
> +
>  	ret = spi_nor_prep_and_lock_pe(nor, instr->addr, instr->len);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	/* whole-chip erase? */
> -	if (len == mtd->size && !(nor->flags & SNOR_F_NO_OP_CHIP_ERASE)) {
> +	/* chip (die) erase? */
> +	if ((len == mtd->size && !(nor->flags & SNOR_F_NO_OP_CHIP_ERASE)) || die_erase) {
>  		unsigned long timeout;
>  
>  		ret = spi_nor_lock_device(nor);
> @@ -2902,6 +2915,9 @@ static int spi_nor_late_init_params(struct spi_nor *nor)
>  			return ret;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (nor->params->chip_erase_opcode)

oops, here I wanted to check for null, when null, set the default.
Takahiro and Fabio, would you please update when/if testing?

	if (!nor->params->chip_erase_opcode)


Thanks!
Tudor Ambarus Nov. 1, 2023, 12:05 p.m. UTC | #2
On 11/1/23 09:43, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> JESD216 defines a chip as a die, one and the other are the same thing.
> JESD216 clarifies that the chip erase time defined in BFPT dword(11)
> applies separately to each die for multi-die devices in which the dice
> are individually accessed. Based on this, update the
> spi_nor_erase_chip() method to support multi-die devices.
> 
> For now, benefit of the die erase when addr and len are aligned with die
> size. This could be improved however for the uniform and non-uniform
> erases cases to use the die erase when possible. For example if one
> requests that an erase of a 2 die device starting from the last 64KB of
> the first die to the end of the flash size, we could use just 2
> commands, a 64KB erase and a die erase. This improvement is left as an
> exercise for the reader, as I don't have multi die flashes at hand.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c    | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
>  drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.h    |  6 ++++--
>  drivers/mtd/spi-nor/debugfs.c |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> index 25a64c65717d..360fce7ffe82 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> @@ -1067,17 +1067,21 @@ static int spi_nor_read_sr2(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 *sr2)
>   */
>  static int spi_nor_erase_chip(struct spi_nor *nor)
>  {
> +	u8 opcode = nor->params->chip_erase_opcode;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	dev_dbg(nor->dev, " %lldKiB\n", (long long)(nor->mtd.size >> 10));
>  
>  	if (nor->spimem) {
> -		struct spi_mem_op op = SPI_NOR_CHIP_ERASE_OP;
> +		struct spi_mem_op op = SPI_NOR_CHIP_ERASE_OP(opcode);
>  
>  		spi_nor_spimem_setup_op(nor, &op, nor->reg_proto);
>  
>  		ret = spi_mem_exec_op(nor->spimem, &op);
>  	} else {
> +		if (opcode != SPINOR_OP_CHIP_ERASE)
> +			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
>  		ret = spi_nor_controller_ops_write_reg(nor,
>  						       SPINOR_OP_CHIP_ERASE,
>  						       NULL, 0);
> @@ -1799,7 +1803,10 @@ static int spi_nor_erase_multi_sectors(struct spi_nor *nor, u64 addr, u32 len)
>  static int spi_nor_erase(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct erase_info *instr)
>  {
>  	struct spi_nor *nor = mtd_to_spi_nor(mtd);
> +	u8 n_dice = nor->params->n_dice;
> +	bool die_erase = false;
>  	u32 addr, len, rem;
> +	size_t die_size;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	dev_dbg(nor->dev, "at 0x%llx, len %lld\n", (long long)instr->addr,
> @@ -1814,12 +1821,18 @@ static int spi_nor_erase(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct erase_info *instr)
>  	addr = instr->addr;
>  	len = instr->len;
>  
> +	if (n_dice) {
> +		die_size = div_u64(mtd->size, n_dice);
> +		if (len == die_size && (addr & (die_size - 1)))
> +			die_erase = true;
> +	}
> +
>  	ret = spi_nor_prep_and_lock_pe(nor, instr->addr, instr->len);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	/* whole-chip erase? */
> -	if (len == mtd->size && !(nor->flags & SNOR_F_NO_OP_CHIP_ERASE)) {
> +	/* chip (die) erase? */
> +	if ((len == mtd->size && !(nor->flags & SNOR_F_NO_OP_CHIP_ERASE)) || die_erase) {

and here I should have iterated over all dices, whereas now I erase just
one die :).
Fabio Estevam Nov. 1, 2023, 12:14 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi Tudor,

Thanks for working on this series, appreciated it.

On 01/11/2023 09:05, Tudor Ambarus wrote:

> and here I should have iterated over all dices, whereas now I erase 
> just
> one die :).

Would you like to send a v2 or let me know the change I should make 
here?

I will be glad to test it.

Thanks
Fabio Estevam Nov. 1, 2023, 12:55 p.m. UTC | #4
Hi Tudor,

On 01/11/2023 06:48, Tudor Ambarus wrote:

> oops, here I wanted to check for null, when null, set the default.
> Takahiro and Fabio, would you please update when/if testing?
> 
> 	if (!nor->params->chip_erase_opcode)

I applied this change on top of your series.

flash_erase command completes very fast:

~# flash_erase /dev/mtd0 0 0
Erasing 131072 Kibyte @ 0 -- 100 % complete

After that, I run 'hexdump -C /dev/mtd0', but I see that the original 
content is still there.

Thanks
Tudor Ambarus Nov. 1, 2023, 2:09 p.m. UTC | #5
On 11/1/23 12:55, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Tudor,
> 
> On 01/11/2023 06:48, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> 
>> oops, here I wanted to check for null, when null, set the default.
>> Takahiro and Fabio, would you please update when/if testing?
>>
>>     if (!nor->params->chip_erase_opcode)
> 
> I applied this change on top of your series.
> 
> flash_erase command completes very fast:
> 
> ~# flash_erase /dev/mtd0 0 0
> Erasing 131072 Kibyte @ 0 -- 100 % complete
> 
> After that, I run 'hexdump -C /dev/mtd0', but I see that the original
> content is still there.

Yes, I had a wrong configuration for the die erase command. Will send a v2.

Thanks!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
index 25a64c65717d..360fce7ffe82 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
@@ -1067,17 +1067,21 @@  static int spi_nor_read_sr2(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 *sr2)
  */
 static int spi_nor_erase_chip(struct spi_nor *nor)
 {
+	u8 opcode = nor->params->chip_erase_opcode;
 	int ret;
 
 	dev_dbg(nor->dev, " %lldKiB\n", (long long)(nor->mtd.size >> 10));
 
 	if (nor->spimem) {
-		struct spi_mem_op op = SPI_NOR_CHIP_ERASE_OP;
+		struct spi_mem_op op = SPI_NOR_CHIP_ERASE_OP(opcode);
 
 		spi_nor_spimem_setup_op(nor, &op, nor->reg_proto);
 
 		ret = spi_mem_exec_op(nor->spimem, &op);
 	} else {
+		if (opcode != SPINOR_OP_CHIP_ERASE)
+			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
 		ret = spi_nor_controller_ops_write_reg(nor,
 						       SPINOR_OP_CHIP_ERASE,
 						       NULL, 0);
@@ -1799,7 +1803,10 @@  static int spi_nor_erase_multi_sectors(struct spi_nor *nor, u64 addr, u32 len)
 static int spi_nor_erase(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct erase_info *instr)
 {
 	struct spi_nor *nor = mtd_to_spi_nor(mtd);
+	u8 n_dice = nor->params->n_dice;
+	bool die_erase = false;
 	u32 addr, len, rem;
+	size_t die_size;
 	int ret;
 
 	dev_dbg(nor->dev, "at 0x%llx, len %lld\n", (long long)instr->addr,
@@ -1814,12 +1821,18 @@  static int spi_nor_erase(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct erase_info *instr)
 	addr = instr->addr;
 	len = instr->len;
 
+	if (n_dice) {
+		die_size = div_u64(mtd->size, n_dice);
+		if (len == die_size && (addr & (die_size - 1)))
+			die_erase = true;
+	}
+
 	ret = spi_nor_prep_and_lock_pe(nor, instr->addr, instr->len);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	/* whole-chip erase? */
-	if (len == mtd->size && !(nor->flags & SNOR_F_NO_OP_CHIP_ERASE)) {
+	/* chip (die) erase? */
+	if ((len == mtd->size && !(nor->flags & SNOR_F_NO_OP_CHIP_ERASE)) || die_erase) {
 		unsigned long timeout;
 
 		ret = spi_nor_lock_device(nor);
@@ -2902,6 +2915,9 @@  static int spi_nor_late_init_params(struct spi_nor *nor)
 			return ret;
 	}
 
+	if (nor->params->chip_erase_opcode)
+		nor->params->chip_erase_opcode = SPINOR_OP_CHIP_ERASE;
+
 	/* Default method kept for backward compatibility. */
 	if (!params->set_4byte_addr_mode)
 		params->set_4byte_addr_mode = spi_nor_set_4byte_addr_mode_brwr;
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.h b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.h
index a456042379ee..f681a139772f 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.h
+++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.h
@@ -85,8 +85,8 @@ 
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DUMMY,					\
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DATA)
 
-#define SPI_NOR_CHIP_ERASE_OP						\
-	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(SPINOR_OP_CHIP_ERASE, 0),		\
+#define SPI_NOR_CHIP_ERASE_OP(opcode)					\
+	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD((opcode), 0),				\
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_NO_ADDR,					\
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DUMMY,					\
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DATA)
@@ -362,6 +362,7 @@  struct spi_nor_otp {
  *			command in octal DTR mode.
  * @n_banks:		number of banks.
  * @n_dice:		number of dice in the flash memory.
+ * @chip_erase_opcode:	chip (die) erase opcode. Shouldn't be set for single die devices.
  * @vreg_offset:	volatile register offset for each die.
  * @hwcaps:		describes the read and page program hardware
  *			capabilities.
@@ -399,6 +400,7 @@  struct spi_nor_flash_parameter {
 	u8				rdsr_addr_nbytes;
 	u8				n_banks;
 	u8				n_dice;
+	u8				chip_erase_opcode;
 	u32				*vreg_offset;
 
 	struct spi_nor_hwcaps		hwcaps;
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/debugfs.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/debugfs.c
index 6e163cb5b478..f242a18e46fc 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/debugfs.c
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@  static int spi_nor_params_show(struct seq_file *s, void *data)
 
 	if (!(nor->flags & SNOR_F_NO_OP_CHIP_ERASE)) {
 		string_get_size(params->size, 1, STRING_UNITS_2, buf, sizeof(buf));
-		seq_printf(s, " %02x (%s)\n", SPINOR_OP_CHIP_ERASE, buf);
+		seq_printf(s, " %02x (%s)\n", nor->params->chip_erase_opcode, buf);
 	}
 
 	seq_puts(s, "\nsector map\n");