diff mbox series

[bpf-next] bpftool: fix prog object type in manpage

Message ID 20231103081126.170034-1-asavkov@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit b94df28c9baedf267d432e14f85eeb9c32c6fa66
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [bpf-next] bpftool: fix prog object type in manpage | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 9 maintainers not CCed: quentin@isovalent.com jolsa@kernel.org sdf@google.com john.fastabend@gmail.com kpsingh@kernel.org song@kernel.org yonghong.song@linux.dev haoluo@google.com martin.lau@linux.dev
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 8 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on s390x with gcc

Commit Message

Artem Savkov Nov. 3, 2023, 8:11 a.m. UTC 
bpftool's man page lists "program" as one of possible values for OBJECT,
while in fact bpftool accepts "prog" instead.

Reported-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
---
 tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Yonghong Song Nov. 3, 2023, 3:34 p.m. UTC | #1 
On 11/3/23 1:11 AM, Artem Savkov wrote:
> bpftool's man page lists "program" as one of possible values for OBJECT,
> while in fact bpftool accepts "prog" instead.
>
> Reported-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>


Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Quentin Monnet Nov. 3, 2023, 4:17 p.m. UTC | #2 
On 3 November 2023 15:34:05 GMT, Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> wrote:
>
>On 11/3/23 1:11 AM, Artem Savkov wrote:
>> bpftool's man page lists "program" as one of possible values for OBJECT,
>> while in fact bpftool accepts "prog" instead.
>> 
>> Reported-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
>
>
>Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
>

Acked-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>

Thanks!
patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Nov. 3, 2023, 7 p.m. UTC | #3 
Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>:

On Fri,  3 Nov 2023 09:11:26 +0100 you wrote:
> bpftool's man page lists "program" as one of possible values for OBJECT,
> while in fact bpftool accepts "prog" instead.
> 
> Reported-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
> ---
>  tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next] bpftool: fix prog object type in manpage
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/b94df28c9bae

You are awesome, thank you!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool.rst b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool.rst
index 6965c94dfdafe..09e4f2ff5658b 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool.rst
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool.rst
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@  SYNOPSIS
 
 	**bpftool** **version**
 
-	*OBJECT* := { **map** | **program** | **link** | **cgroup** | **perf** | **net** | **feature** |
+	*OBJECT* := { **map** | **prog** | **link** | **cgroup** | **perf** | **net** | **feature** |
 	**btf** | **gen** | **struct_ops** | **iter** }
 
 	*OPTIONS* := { { **-V** | **--version** } | |COMMON_OPTIONS| }