| Message ID | 20231108104343.24192-11-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | dt-bindings: samsung: add specific compatibles for existing SoC | expand |
On Wed, 08 Nov 2023 11:43:36 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Samsung Exynos SoC reuses several devices from older designs, thus > historically we kept the old (block's) compatible only. This works fine > and there is no bug here, however guidelines expressed in > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst state that: > 1. Compatibles should be specific. > 2. We should add new compatibles in case of bugs or features. > > Add compatibles specific to each SoC in front of all old-SoC-like > compatibles. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > > --- > > I propose to take the patch through Samsung SoC (me). See cover letter > for explanation. > --- > .../bindings/iio/adc/samsung,exynos-adc.yaml | 29 +++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2023 4:14 PM > Samsung Exynos SoC reuses several devices from older designs, thus > historically we kept the old (block's) compatible only. This works fine and > there is no bug here, however guidelines expressed in > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst state that: > 1. Compatibles should be specific. > 2. We should add new compatibles in case of bugs or features. > > Add compatibles specific to each SoC in front of all old-SoC-like compatibles. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> > --- > > I propose to take the patch through Samsung SoC (me). See cover letter for > explanation. > --- > .../bindings/iio/adc/samsung,exynos-adc.yaml | 29 +++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > (...)
On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 11:43:36 +0100 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote: > Samsung Exynos SoC reuses several devices from older designs, thus > historically we kept the old (block's) compatible only. This works fine > and there is no bug here, however guidelines expressed in > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst state that: > 1. Compatibles should be specific. > 2. We should add new compatibles in case of bugs or features. > > Add compatibles specific to each SoC in front of all old-SoC-like > compatibles. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> > > --- > > I propose to take the patch through Samsung SoC (me). See cover letter > for explanation. > --- > .../bindings/iio/adc/samsung,exynos-adc.yaml | 29 +++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/samsung,exynos-adc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/samsung,exynos-adc.yaml > index 582d0a03b814..4e40f6bed5db 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/samsung,exynos-adc.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/samsung,exynos-adc.yaml > @@ -11,18 +11,23 @@ maintainers: > > properties: > compatible: > - enum: > - - samsung,exynos-adc-v1 # Exynos5250 > - - samsung,exynos-adc-v2 > - - samsung,exynos3250-adc > - - samsung,exynos4212-adc # Exynos4212 and Exynos4412 > - - samsung,exynos7-adc > - - samsung,s3c2410-adc > - - samsung,s3c2416-adc > - - samsung,s3c2440-adc > - - samsung,s3c2443-adc > - - samsung,s3c6410-adc > - - samsung,s5pv210-adc > + oneOf: > + - enum: > + - samsung,exynos-adc-v1 # Exynos5250 > + - samsung,exynos-adc-v2 > + - samsung,exynos3250-adc > + - samsung,exynos4212-adc # Exynos4212 and Exynos4412 > + - samsung,exynos7-adc > + - samsung,s3c2410-adc > + - samsung,s3c2416-adc > + - samsung,s3c2440-adc > + - samsung,s3c2443-adc > + - samsung,s3c6410-adc > + - samsung,s5pv210-adc > + - items: > + - enum: > + - samsung,exynos5433-adc > + - const: samsung,exynos7-adc > > reg: > maxItems: 1
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/samsung,exynos-adc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/samsung,exynos-adc.yaml index 582d0a03b814..4e40f6bed5db 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/samsung,exynos-adc.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/samsung,exynos-adc.yaml @@ -11,18 +11,23 @@ maintainers: properties: compatible: - enum: - - samsung,exynos-adc-v1 # Exynos5250 - - samsung,exynos-adc-v2 - - samsung,exynos3250-adc - - samsung,exynos4212-adc # Exynos4212 and Exynos4412 - - samsung,exynos7-adc - - samsung,s3c2410-adc - - samsung,s3c2416-adc - - samsung,s3c2440-adc - - samsung,s3c2443-adc - - samsung,s3c6410-adc - - samsung,s5pv210-adc + oneOf: + - enum: + - samsung,exynos-adc-v1 # Exynos5250 + - samsung,exynos-adc-v2 + - samsung,exynos3250-adc + - samsung,exynos4212-adc # Exynos4212 and Exynos4412 + - samsung,exynos7-adc + - samsung,s3c2410-adc + - samsung,s3c2416-adc + - samsung,s3c2440-adc + - samsung,s3c2443-adc + - samsung,s3c6410-adc + - samsung,s5pv210-adc + - items: + - enum: + - samsung,exynos5433-adc + - const: samsung,exynos7-adc reg: maxItems: 1
Samsung Exynos SoC reuses several devices from older designs, thus historically we kept the old (block's) compatible only. This works fine and there is no bug here, however guidelines expressed in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst state that: 1. Compatibles should be specific. 2. We should add new compatibles in case of bugs or features. Add compatibles specific to each SoC in front of all old-SoC-like compatibles. Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> --- I propose to take the patch through Samsung SoC (me). See cover letter for explanation. --- .../bindings/iio/adc/samsung,exynos-adc.yaml | 29 +++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)