[RFC,0/3] LSM syscall tweaks

Message ID	20231024213525.361332-4-paul@paul-moore.com (mailing list archive)
Headers	show Return-Path: <selinux-owner@vger.kernel.org> From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org, Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>, John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>, =?utf-8?q?Micka=C3=ABl_Sala?= =?utf-8?q?=C3=BCn?= <mic@digikod.net> Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/3] LSM syscall tweaks Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 17:35:26 -0400 Message-ID: <20231024213525.361332-4-paul@paul-moore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk
Series	LSM syscall tweaks \| expand [RFC,0/3] LSM syscall tweaks [RFC,1/3] lsm: cleanup the size counters in security_getselfattr() [RFC,2/3] lsm: correct error codes in security_getselfattr() [RFC,3/3] lsm: consolidate buffer size handling into lsm_fill_user_ctx()

Message ID

20231024213525.361332-4-paul@paul-moore.com (mailing list archive)

Headers

From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org, Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
 John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>, =?utf-8?q?Micka=C3=ABl_Sala?=
	=?utf-8?q?=C3=BCn?= <mic@digikod.net>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/3] LSM syscall tweaks
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 17:35:26 -0400
Message-ID: <20231024213525.361332-4-paul@paul-moore.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Series

LSM syscall tweaks | expand

Message

Paul Moore Oct. 24, 2023, 9:35 p.m. UTC

Three rather small LSM patches to address some minor issues found during
the review of the latest LSM syscall patchset that now lives in the
lsm/next-queue tree.

I'm marking these as RFC patches as they have yet to be properly tested,
but I'm building a kernel now to do that and I'll report back when testing
has completed.  In the meantime, reviews and ACKs are appreciated.

Comments

Paul Moore Nov. 1, 2023, 9:24 p.m. UTC | #1

On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 5:39 PM Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> wrote:
>
> Three rather small LSM patches to address some minor issues found during
> the review of the latest LSM syscall patchset that now lives in the
> lsm/next-queue tree.
>
> I'm marking these as RFC patches as they have yet to be properly tested,
> but I'm building a kernel now to do that and I'll report back when testing
> has completed.  In the meantime, reviews and ACKs are appreciated.

I went ahead and merged these into lsm/dev-staging and rebased the
branch on Linus' latest to incorporate the syscall additions in his
tree.  As the merge window is open, I did not do the corresponding
update to the lsm/next branch, that will be updated when the merge
window is closed and -rc1 is released.

Casey Schaufler Nov. 1, 2023, 10:26 p.m. UTC | #2

On 11/1/2023 2:24 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 5:39 PM Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> wrote:
>> Three rather small LSM patches to address some minor issues found during
>> the review of the latest LSM syscall patchset that now lives in the
>> lsm/next-queue tree.
>>
>> I'm marking these as RFC patches as they have yet to be properly tested,
>> but I'm building a kernel now to do that and I'll report back when testing
>> has completed.  In the meantime, reviews and ACKs are appreciated.
> I went ahead and merged these into lsm/dev-staging and rebased the
> branch on Linus' latest to incorporate the syscall additions in his
> tree.  As the merge window is open, I did not do the corresponding
> update to the lsm/next branch, that will be updated when the merge
> window is closed and -rc1 is released.

Excellent. Thank you.

Paul Moore Nov. 13, 2023, 4:07 a.m. UTC | #3

On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 5:39 PM Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> wrote:
>
> Three rather small LSM patches to address some minor issues found during
> the review of the latest LSM syscall patchset that now lives in the
> lsm/next-queue tree.
>
> I'm marking these as RFC patches as they have yet to be properly tested,
> but I'm building a kernel now to do that and I'll report back when testing
> has completed.  In the meantime, reviews and ACKs are appreciated.

These have been merged into lsm/dev.