| Message ID | 20231109164427.460493-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | s390/vfio-ap: a couple of corrections to the IRQ enablement function | expand |
On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 11:44:19AM -0500, Tony Krowiak wrote: > This series corrects two issues related to enablement of interrupts in > response to interception of the PQAP(AQIC) command: ... Hi Tony! Via which tree this series is to be pulled? Thanks!
Am 15.11.23 um 15:29 schrieb Alexander Gordeev: > On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 11:44:19AM -0500, Tony Krowiak wrote: >> This series corrects two issues related to enablement of interrupts in >> response to interception of the PQAP(AQIC) command: > ... > > Hi Tony! > > Via which tree this series is to be pulled? > > Thanks! I wanted to create a topic repository/branch for s390-specfic vfio code when we expect conflicts or touch kvm or vfio base code. I started that but I have not finished my preparations. Given the diffstat: drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 12 ++++++++---- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) This looks pretty much isolated to s390, so unless Paolo or Alex complain, we should simply carry that via the s390 tree. Alexander, can you take those patches? Tony, I assume none if the patches is urgent and can wait for the next merge window, correct? Christian
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 04:31:49PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > Alexander, can you take those patches? Applied, thanks! > Christian
On 11/17/23 10:31, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > Am 15.11.23 um 15:29 schrieb Alexander Gordeev: >> On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 11:44:19AM -0500, Tony Krowiak wrote: >>> This series corrects two issues related to enablement of interrupts in >>> response to interception of the PQAP(AQIC) command: >> ... >> >> Hi Tony! >> >> Via which tree this series is to be pulled? >> >> Thanks! > > I wanted to create a topic repository/branch for s390-specfic vfio code > when we expect conflicts or touch kvm or vfio base code. > I started that but I have not finished my preparations. > > Given the diffstat: > drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 12 ++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > This looks pretty much isolated to s390, so unless Paolo or Alex complain, > we should simply carry that via the s390 tree. > Alexander, can you take those patches? > Tony, I assume none if the patches is urgent and can wait for the next > merge window, correct? It is not urgent. > > Christian
This series corrects two issues related to enablement of interrupts in response to interception of the PQAP(AQIC) command: 1. Returning a status response code 06 (Invalid address of AP-queue notification byte) when the call to register a guest ISC fails makes no sense. 2. The pages containing the interrupt notification-indicator byte are not freed after a failure to register the guest ISC fails. Anthony Krowiak (2): s390/vfio-ap: unpin pages on gisc registration failure s390/vfio-ap: set status response code to 06 on gisc registration failure Tony Krowiak (1): s390/vfio-ap: improve reaction to response code 07 from PQAP(AQIC) command drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 12 ++++++++---- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)