| Message ID | 20231130125606.64931-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v2] riscv: errata: andes: Probe for IOCP only once in boot stage | expand |
Hi Prabhakar, On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 1:56 PM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> > > We need to probe for IOCP only once during boot stage, as we were probing > for IOCP for all the stages this caused the below issue during module-init > stage, > > [9.019104] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffffffff8100d3a0 > [9.027153] Oops [#1] > [9.029421] Modules linked in: rcar_canfd renesas_usbhs i2c_riic can_dev spi_rspi i2c_core > [9.037686] CPU: 0 PID: 90 Comm: udevd Not tainted 6.7.0-rc1+ #57 > [9.043756] Hardware name: Renesas SMARC EVK based on r9a07g043f01 (DT) > [9.050339] epc : riscv_noncoherent_supported+0x10/0x3e > [9.055558] ra : andes_errata_patch_func+0x4a/0x52 > [9.060418] epc : ffffffff8000d8c2 ra : ffffffff8000d95c sp : ffffffc8003abb00 > [9.067607] gp : ffffffff814e25a0 tp : ffffffd80361e540 t0 : 0000000000000000 > [9.074795] t1 : 000000000900031e t2 : 0000000000000001 s0 : ffffffc8003abb20 > [9.081984] s1 : ffffffff015b57c7 a0 : 0000000000000000 a1 : 0000000000000001 > [9.089172] a2 : 0000000000000000 a3 : 0000000000000000 a4 : ffffffff8100d8be > [9.096360] a5 : 0000000000000001 a6 : 0000000000000001 a7 : 000000000900031e > [9.103548] s2 : ffffffff015b57d7 s3 : 0000000000000001 s4 : 000000000000031e > [9.110736] s5 : 8000000000008a45 s6 : 0000000000000500 s7 : 000000000000003f > [9.117924] s8 : ffffffc8003abd48 s9 : ffffffff015b1140 s10: ffffffff8151a1b0 > [9.125113] s11: ffffffff015b1000 t3 : 0000000000000001 t4 : fefefefefefefeff > [9.132301] t5 : ffffffff015b57c7 t6 : ffffffd8b63a6000 > [9.137587] status: 0000000200000120 badaddr: ffffffff8100d3a0 cause: 000000000000000f > [9.145468] [<ffffffff8000d8c2>] riscv_noncoherent_supported+0x10/0x3e > [9.151972] [<ffffffff800027e8>] _apply_alternatives+0x84/0x86 > [9.157784] [<ffffffff800029be>] apply_module_alternatives+0x10/0x1a > [9.164113] [<ffffffff80008fcc>] module_finalize+0x5e/0x7a > [9.169583] [<ffffffff80085cd6>] load_module+0xfd8/0x179c > [9.174965] [<ffffffff80086630>] init_module_from_file+0x76/0xaa > [9.180948] [<ffffffff800867f6>] __riscv_sys_finit_module+0x176/0x2a8 > [9.187365] [<ffffffff80889862>] do_trap_ecall_u+0xbe/0x130 > [9.192922] [<ffffffff808920bc>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0x64 > [9.198573] Code: 0009 b7e9 6797 014d a783 85a7 c799 4785 0717 0100 (0123) aef7 > [9.205994] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- > > This is because we called riscv_noncoherent_supported() for all the stages > during IOCP probe. riscv_noncoherent_supported() function sets > noncoherent_supported variable to true which has an annotation set to > "__ro_after_init" due to which we were seeing the above splat. Fix this by > probing for IOCP only once in boot stage by having a boolean variable > is_iocp_probe_done which will be set to true upon IOCP probe in > errata_probe_iocp() and we bail out early if is_iocp_probe_done is set. > > While at it make return type of errata_probe_iocp() to void as we were > not checking the return value in andes_errata_patch_func(). > > Fixes: e021ae7f5145 ("riscv: errata: Add Andes alternative ports") > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> > --- > v1->v2 > * As RISCV_ALTERNATIVES_BOOT stage can happen twice add a is_iocp_probe_done > variable to probe for IOCP only once. > * Updated commit message > * Make return value of errata_probe_iocp() to void Thanks for the update! > --- a/arch/riscv/errata/andes/errata.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/errata/andes/errata.c > @@ -38,29 +38,36 @@ static long ax45mp_iocp_sw_workaround(void) > return ret.error ? 0 : ret.value; > } > > -static bool errata_probe_iocp(unsigned int stage, unsigned long arch_id, unsigned long impid) > +static void errata_probe_iocp(unsigned int stage, unsigned long arch_id, unsigned long impid) > { > + static bool is_iocp_probe_done; done? > + > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ERRATA_ANDES_CMO)) > - return false; > + return; > + > + if (is_iocp_probe_done) > + return; > Why not keep it simple, and just do done = true; here? Can arch_id or impid suddenly change, so you have to recheck? If the SBI call in ax45mp_iocp_sw_workaround() fails, is there really a need to try it again later? > if (arch_id != ANDESTECH_AX45MP_MARCHID || impid != ANDESTECH_AX45MP_MIMPID) > - return false; > + return; > > - if (!ax45mp_iocp_sw_workaround()) > - return false; > + if (!ax45mp_iocp_sw_workaround()) { > + is_iocp_probe_done = true; > + return; > + } > > /* Set this just to make core cbo code happy */ > riscv_cbom_block_size = 1; > riscv_noncoherent_supported(); > - > - return true; > + is_iocp_probe_done = true; > } Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert
Hi Geert, Thank you for the review. On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 2:34 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > Hi Prabhakar, > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 1:56 PM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote: > > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> > > > > We need to probe for IOCP only once during boot stage, as we were probing > > for IOCP for all the stages this caused the below issue during module-init > > stage, > > > > [9.019104] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffffffff8100d3a0 > > [9.027153] Oops [#1] > > [9.029421] Modules linked in: rcar_canfd renesas_usbhs i2c_riic can_dev spi_rspi i2c_core > > [9.037686] CPU: 0 PID: 90 Comm: udevd Not tainted 6.7.0-rc1+ #57 > > [9.043756] Hardware name: Renesas SMARC EVK based on r9a07g043f01 (DT) > > [9.050339] epc : riscv_noncoherent_supported+0x10/0x3e > > [9.055558] ra : andes_errata_patch_func+0x4a/0x52 > > [9.060418] epc : ffffffff8000d8c2 ra : ffffffff8000d95c sp : ffffffc8003abb00 > > [9.067607] gp : ffffffff814e25a0 tp : ffffffd80361e540 t0 : 0000000000000000 > > [9.074795] t1 : 000000000900031e t2 : 0000000000000001 s0 : ffffffc8003abb20 > > [9.081984] s1 : ffffffff015b57c7 a0 : 0000000000000000 a1 : 0000000000000001 > > [9.089172] a2 : 0000000000000000 a3 : 0000000000000000 a4 : ffffffff8100d8be > > [9.096360] a5 : 0000000000000001 a6 : 0000000000000001 a7 : 000000000900031e > > [9.103548] s2 : ffffffff015b57d7 s3 : 0000000000000001 s4 : 000000000000031e > > [9.110736] s5 : 8000000000008a45 s6 : 0000000000000500 s7 : 000000000000003f > > [9.117924] s8 : ffffffc8003abd48 s9 : ffffffff015b1140 s10: ffffffff8151a1b0 > > [9.125113] s11: ffffffff015b1000 t3 : 0000000000000001 t4 : fefefefefefefeff > > [9.132301] t5 : ffffffff015b57c7 t6 : ffffffd8b63a6000 > > [9.137587] status: 0000000200000120 badaddr: ffffffff8100d3a0 cause: 000000000000000f > > [9.145468] [<ffffffff8000d8c2>] riscv_noncoherent_supported+0x10/0x3e > > [9.151972] [<ffffffff800027e8>] _apply_alternatives+0x84/0x86 > > [9.157784] [<ffffffff800029be>] apply_module_alternatives+0x10/0x1a > > [9.164113] [<ffffffff80008fcc>] module_finalize+0x5e/0x7a > > [9.169583] [<ffffffff80085cd6>] load_module+0xfd8/0x179c > > [9.174965] [<ffffffff80086630>] init_module_from_file+0x76/0xaa > > [9.180948] [<ffffffff800867f6>] __riscv_sys_finit_module+0x176/0x2a8 > > [9.187365] [<ffffffff80889862>] do_trap_ecall_u+0xbe/0x130 > > [9.192922] [<ffffffff808920bc>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0x64 > > [9.198573] Code: 0009 b7e9 6797 014d a783 85a7 c799 4785 0717 0100 (0123) aef7 > > [9.205994] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- > > > > This is because we called riscv_noncoherent_supported() for all the stages > > during IOCP probe. riscv_noncoherent_supported() function sets > > noncoherent_supported variable to true which has an annotation set to > > "__ro_after_init" due to which we were seeing the above splat. Fix this by > > probing for IOCP only once in boot stage by having a boolean variable > > is_iocp_probe_done which will be set to true upon IOCP probe in > > errata_probe_iocp() and we bail out early if is_iocp_probe_done is set. > > > > While at it make return type of errata_probe_iocp() to void as we were > > not checking the return value in andes_errata_patch_func(). > > > > Fixes: e021ae7f5145 ("riscv: errata: Add Andes alternative ports") > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> > > --- > > v1->v2 > > * As RISCV_ALTERNATIVES_BOOT stage can happen twice add a is_iocp_probe_done > > variable to probe for IOCP only once. > > * Updated commit message > > * Make return value of errata_probe_iocp() to void > > Thanks for the update! > > > --- a/arch/riscv/errata/andes/errata.c > > +++ b/arch/riscv/errata/andes/errata.c > > @@ -38,29 +38,36 @@ static long ax45mp_iocp_sw_workaround(void) > > return ret.error ? 0 : ret.value; > > } > > > > -static bool errata_probe_iocp(unsigned int stage, unsigned long arch_id, unsigned long impid) > > +static void errata_probe_iocp(unsigned int stage, unsigned long arch_id, unsigned long impid) > > { > > + static bool is_iocp_probe_done; > > done? > OK I'll rename it to "done". > > + > > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ERRATA_ANDES_CMO)) > > - return false; > > + return; > > + > > + if (is_iocp_probe_done) > > + return; > > > > Why not keep it simple, and just do > > done = true; > OK. > here? > Can arch_id or impid suddenly change, so you have to recheck? I only check arch_id and impid here. Are you suggesting I drop it? > If the SBI call in ax45mp_iocp_sw_workaround() fails, is there really > a need to try it again later? > No if it fails we just continue with a broken system. Cheers, Prabhakar > > if (arch_id != ANDESTECH_AX45MP_MARCHID || impid != ANDESTECH_AX45MP_MIMPID) > > - return false; > > + return; > > > > - if (!ax45mp_iocp_sw_workaround()) > > - return false; > > + if (!ax45mp_iocp_sw_workaround()) { > > + is_iocp_probe_done = true; > > + return; > > + } > > > > /* Set this just to make core cbo code happy */ > > riscv_cbom_block_size = 1; > > riscv_noncoherent_supported(); > > - > > - return true; > > + is_iocp_probe_done = true; > > } > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert > > -- > Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org > > In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But > when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. > -- Linus Torvalds
Hi Prabhakar, On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 5:23 PM Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 2:34 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 1:56 PM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote: > > > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> > > > > > > We need to probe for IOCP only once during boot stage, as we were probing > > > for IOCP for all the stages this caused the below issue during module-init > > > stage, > > > > > > [9.019104] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffffffff8100d3a0 > > > [9.027153] Oops [#1] > > > [9.029421] Modules linked in: rcar_canfd renesas_usbhs i2c_riic can_dev spi_rspi i2c_core > > > [9.037686] CPU: 0 PID: 90 Comm: udevd Not tainted 6.7.0-rc1+ #57 > > > [9.043756] Hardware name: Renesas SMARC EVK based on r9a07g043f01 (DT) > > > [9.050339] epc : riscv_noncoherent_supported+0x10/0x3e > > > [9.055558] ra : andes_errata_patch_func+0x4a/0x52 > > > [9.060418] epc : ffffffff8000d8c2 ra : ffffffff8000d95c sp : ffffffc8003abb00 > > > [9.067607] gp : ffffffff814e25a0 tp : ffffffd80361e540 t0 : 0000000000000000 > > > [9.074795] t1 : 000000000900031e t2 : 0000000000000001 s0 : ffffffc8003abb20 > > > [9.081984] s1 : ffffffff015b57c7 a0 : 0000000000000000 a1 : 0000000000000001 > > > [9.089172] a2 : 0000000000000000 a3 : 0000000000000000 a4 : ffffffff8100d8be > > > [9.096360] a5 : 0000000000000001 a6 : 0000000000000001 a7 : 000000000900031e > > > [9.103548] s2 : ffffffff015b57d7 s3 : 0000000000000001 s4 : 000000000000031e > > > [9.110736] s5 : 8000000000008a45 s6 : 0000000000000500 s7 : 000000000000003f > > > [9.117924] s8 : ffffffc8003abd48 s9 : ffffffff015b1140 s10: ffffffff8151a1b0 > > > [9.125113] s11: ffffffff015b1000 t3 : 0000000000000001 t4 : fefefefefefefeff > > > [9.132301] t5 : ffffffff015b57c7 t6 : ffffffd8b63a6000 > > > [9.137587] status: 0000000200000120 badaddr: ffffffff8100d3a0 cause: 000000000000000f > > > [9.145468] [<ffffffff8000d8c2>] riscv_noncoherent_supported+0x10/0x3e > > > [9.151972] [<ffffffff800027e8>] _apply_alternatives+0x84/0x86 > > > [9.157784] [<ffffffff800029be>] apply_module_alternatives+0x10/0x1a > > > [9.164113] [<ffffffff80008fcc>] module_finalize+0x5e/0x7a > > > [9.169583] [<ffffffff80085cd6>] load_module+0xfd8/0x179c > > > [9.174965] [<ffffffff80086630>] init_module_from_file+0x76/0xaa > > > [9.180948] [<ffffffff800867f6>] __riscv_sys_finit_module+0x176/0x2a8 > > > [9.187365] [<ffffffff80889862>] do_trap_ecall_u+0xbe/0x130 > > > [9.192922] [<ffffffff808920bc>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0x64 > > > [9.198573] Code: 0009 b7e9 6797 014d a783 85a7 c799 4785 0717 0100 (0123) aef7 > > > [9.205994] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- > > > > > > This is because we called riscv_noncoherent_supported() for all the stages > > > during IOCP probe. riscv_noncoherent_supported() function sets > > > noncoherent_supported variable to true which has an annotation set to > > > "__ro_after_init" due to which we were seeing the above splat. Fix this by > > > probing for IOCP only once in boot stage by having a boolean variable > > > is_iocp_probe_done which will be set to true upon IOCP probe in > > > errata_probe_iocp() and we bail out early if is_iocp_probe_done is set. > > > > > > While at it make return type of errata_probe_iocp() to void as we were > > > not checking the return value in andes_errata_patch_func(). > > > > > > Fixes: e021ae7f5145 ("riscv: errata: Add Andes alternative ports") > > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> > > > --- > > > v1->v2 > > > * As RISCV_ALTERNATIVES_BOOT stage can happen twice add a is_iocp_probe_done > > > variable to probe for IOCP only once. > > > * Updated commit message > > > * Make return value of errata_probe_iocp() to void > > > > Thanks for the update! > > > > > --- a/arch/riscv/errata/andes/errata.c > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/errata/andes/errata.c > > > @@ -38,29 +38,36 @@ static long ax45mp_iocp_sw_workaround(void) > > > return ret.error ? 0 : ret.value; > > > } > > > > > > -static bool errata_probe_iocp(unsigned int stage, unsigned long arch_id, unsigned long impid) > > > +static void errata_probe_iocp(unsigned int stage, unsigned long arch_id, unsigned long impid) > > > { > > > + static bool is_iocp_probe_done; > > > > done? > > > OK I'll rename it to "done". > > > > + > > > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ERRATA_ANDES_CMO)) > > > - return false; > > > + return; > > > + > > > + if (is_iocp_probe_done) > > > + return; > > > > > > > Why not keep it simple, and just do > > > > done = true; > > > OK. > > > here? > > Can arch_id or impid suddenly change, so you have to recheck? > I only check arch_id and impid here. Are you suggesting I drop it? No, I do not suggest to drop it. I suggested moving the "done = true" up, so the check is done only once. > > If the SBI call in ax45mp_iocp_sw_workaround() fails, is there really > > a need to try it again later? > > > No if it fails we just continue with a broken system. > > Cheers, > Prabhakar > > > if (arch_id != ANDESTECH_AX45MP_MARCHID || impid != ANDESTECH_AX45MP_MIMPID) > > > - return false; > > > + return; > > > > > > - if (!ax45mp_iocp_sw_workaround()) > > > - return false; > > > + if (!ax45mp_iocp_sw_workaround()) { > > > + is_iocp_probe_done = true; > > > + return; > > > + } > > > > > > /* Set this just to make core cbo code happy */ > > > riscv_cbom_block_size = 1; > > > riscv_noncoherent_supported(); > > > - > > > - return true; > > > + is_iocp_probe_done = true; > > > } Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert
Hi Geert, On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 4:26 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > Hi Prabhakar, > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 5:23 PM Lad, Prabhakar > <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 2:34 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 1:56 PM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> > > > > > > > > We need to probe for IOCP only once during boot stage, as we were probing > > > > for IOCP for all the stages this caused the below issue during module-init > > > > stage, > > > > > > > > [9.019104] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffffffff8100d3a0 > > > > [9.027153] Oops [#1] > > > > [9.029421] Modules linked in: rcar_canfd renesas_usbhs i2c_riic can_dev spi_rspi i2c_core > > > > [9.037686] CPU: 0 PID: 90 Comm: udevd Not tainted 6.7.0-rc1+ #57 > > > > [9.043756] Hardware name: Renesas SMARC EVK based on r9a07g043f01 (DT) > > > > [9.050339] epc : riscv_noncoherent_supported+0x10/0x3e > > > > [9.055558] ra : andes_errata_patch_func+0x4a/0x52 > > > > [9.060418] epc : ffffffff8000d8c2 ra : ffffffff8000d95c sp : ffffffc8003abb00 > > > > [9.067607] gp : ffffffff814e25a0 tp : ffffffd80361e540 t0 : 0000000000000000 > > > > [9.074795] t1 : 000000000900031e t2 : 0000000000000001 s0 : ffffffc8003abb20 > > > > [9.081984] s1 : ffffffff015b57c7 a0 : 0000000000000000 a1 : 0000000000000001 > > > > [9.089172] a2 : 0000000000000000 a3 : 0000000000000000 a4 : ffffffff8100d8be > > > > [9.096360] a5 : 0000000000000001 a6 : 0000000000000001 a7 : 000000000900031e > > > > [9.103548] s2 : ffffffff015b57d7 s3 : 0000000000000001 s4 : 000000000000031e > > > > [9.110736] s5 : 8000000000008a45 s6 : 0000000000000500 s7 : 000000000000003f > > > > [9.117924] s8 : ffffffc8003abd48 s9 : ffffffff015b1140 s10: ffffffff8151a1b0 > > > > [9.125113] s11: ffffffff015b1000 t3 : 0000000000000001 t4 : fefefefefefefeff > > > > [9.132301] t5 : ffffffff015b57c7 t6 : ffffffd8b63a6000 > > > > [9.137587] status: 0000000200000120 badaddr: ffffffff8100d3a0 cause: 000000000000000f > > > > [9.145468] [<ffffffff8000d8c2>] riscv_noncoherent_supported+0x10/0x3e > > > > [9.151972] [<ffffffff800027e8>] _apply_alternatives+0x84/0x86 > > > > [9.157784] [<ffffffff800029be>] apply_module_alternatives+0x10/0x1a > > > > [9.164113] [<ffffffff80008fcc>] module_finalize+0x5e/0x7a > > > > [9.169583] [<ffffffff80085cd6>] load_module+0xfd8/0x179c > > > > [9.174965] [<ffffffff80086630>] init_module_from_file+0x76/0xaa > > > > [9.180948] [<ffffffff800867f6>] __riscv_sys_finit_module+0x176/0x2a8 > > > > [9.187365] [<ffffffff80889862>] do_trap_ecall_u+0xbe/0x130 > > > > [9.192922] [<ffffffff808920bc>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0x64 > > > > [9.198573] Code: 0009 b7e9 6797 014d a783 85a7 c799 4785 0717 0100 (0123) aef7 > > > > [9.205994] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- > > > > > > > > This is because we called riscv_noncoherent_supported() for all the stages > > > > during IOCP probe. riscv_noncoherent_supported() function sets > > > > noncoherent_supported variable to true which has an annotation set to > > > > "__ro_after_init" due to which we were seeing the above splat. Fix this by > > > > probing for IOCP only once in boot stage by having a boolean variable > > > > is_iocp_probe_done which will be set to true upon IOCP probe in > > > > errata_probe_iocp() and we bail out early if is_iocp_probe_done is set. > > > > > > > > While at it make return type of errata_probe_iocp() to void as we were > > > > not checking the return value in andes_errata_patch_func(). > > > > > > > > Fixes: e021ae7f5145 ("riscv: errata: Add Andes alternative ports") > > > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> > > > > --- > > > > v1->v2 > > > > * As RISCV_ALTERNATIVES_BOOT stage can happen twice add a is_iocp_probe_done > > > > variable to probe for IOCP only once. > > > > * Updated commit message > > > > * Make return value of errata_probe_iocp() to void > > > > > > Thanks for the update! > > > > > > > --- a/arch/riscv/errata/andes/errata.c > > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/errata/andes/errata.c > > > > @@ -38,29 +38,36 @@ static long ax45mp_iocp_sw_workaround(void) > > > > return ret.error ? 0 : ret.value; > > > > } > > > > > > > > -static bool errata_probe_iocp(unsigned int stage, unsigned long arch_id, unsigned long impid) > > > > +static void errata_probe_iocp(unsigned int stage, unsigned long arch_id, unsigned long impid) > > > > { > > > > + static bool is_iocp_probe_done; > > > > > > done? > > > > > OK I'll rename it to "done". > > > > > > + > > > > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ERRATA_ANDES_CMO)) > > > > - return false; > > > > + return; > > > > + > > > > + if (is_iocp_probe_done) > > > > + return; > > > > > > > > > > Why not keep it simple, and just do > > > > > > done = true; > > > > > OK. > > > > > here? > > > Can arch_id or impid suddenly change, so you have to recheck? > > I only check arch_id and impid here. Are you suggesting I drop it? > > No, I do not suggest to drop it. > I suggested moving the "done = true" up, so the check is done only once. > OK, I'll have something like below: static void errata_probe_iocp(unsigned int stage, unsigned long arch_id, unsigned long impid) { static bool done; if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ERRATA_ANDES_CMO)) return; if (done) return; if (arch_id != ANDES_AX45MP_MARCHID || impid != ANDES_AX45MP_MIMPID) return; done = true; if (!ax45mp_iocp_sw_workaround()) return; /* Set this just to make core cbo code happy */ riscv_cbom_block_size = 1; riscv_noncoherent_supported(); } Cheers, Prabhakar
Hi Prabhakar, On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 5:50 PM Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 4:26 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 5:23 PM Lad, Prabhakar > > <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 2:34 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 1:56 PM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> > > > > > > > > > > We need to probe for IOCP only once during boot stage, as we were probing > > > > > for IOCP for all the stages this caused the below issue during module-init > > > > > stage, > > > > > > > > > > [9.019104] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffffffff8100d3a0 > > > > > [9.027153] Oops [#1] > > > > > [9.029421] Modules linked in: rcar_canfd renesas_usbhs i2c_riic can_dev spi_rspi i2c_core > > > > > [9.037686] CPU: 0 PID: 90 Comm: udevd Not tainted 6.7.0-rc1+ #57 > > > > > [9.043756] Hardware name: Renesas SMARC EVK based on r9a07g043f01 (DT) > > > > > [9.050339] epc : riscv_noncoherent_supported+0x10/0x3e > > > > > [9.055558] ra : andes_errata_patch_func+0x4a/0x52 > > > > > [9.060418] epc : ffffffff8000d8c2 ra : ffffffff8000d95c sp : ffffffc8003abb00 > > > > > [9.067607] gp : ffffffff814e25a0 tp : ffffffd80361e540 t0 : 0000000000000000 > > > > > [9.074795] t1 : 000000000900031e t2 : 0000000000000001 s0 : ffffffc8003abb20 > > > > > [9.081984] s1 : ffffffff015b57c7 a0 : 0000000000000000 a1 : 0000000000000001 > > > > > [9.089172] a2 : 0000000000000000 a3 : 0000000000000000 a4 : ffffffff8100d8be > > > > > [9.096360] a5 : 0000000000000001 a6 : 0000000000000001 a7 : 000000000900031e > > > > > [9.103548] s2 : ffffffff015b57d7 s3 : 0000000000000001 s4 : 000000000000031e > > > > > [9.110736] s5 : 8000000000008a45 s6 : 0000000000000500 s7 : 000000000000003f > > > > > [9.117924] s8 : ffffffc8003abd48 s9 : ffffffff015b1140 s10: ffffffff8151a1b0 > > > > > [9.125113] s11: ffffffff015b1000 t3 : 0000000000000001 t4 : fefefefefefefeff > > > > > [9.132301] t5 : ffffffff015b57c7 t6 : ffffffd8b63a6000 > > > > > [9.137587] status: 0000000200000120 badaddr: ffffffff8100d3a0 cause: 000000000000000f > > > > > [9.145468] [<ffffffff8000d8c2>] riscv_noncoherent_supported+0x10/0x3e > > > > > [9.151972] [<ffffffff800027e8>] _apply_alternatives+0x84/0x86 > > > > > [9.157784] [<ffffffff800029be>] apply_module_alternatives+0x10/0x1a > > > > > [9.164113] [<ffffffff80008fcc>] module_finalize+0x5e/0x7a > > > > > [9.169583] [<ffffffff80085cd6>] load_module+0xfd8/0x179c > > > > > [9.174965] [<ffffffff80086630>] init_module_from_file+0x76/0xaa > > > > > [9.180948] [<ffffffff800867f6>] __riscv_sys_finit_module+0x176/0x2a8 > > > > > [9.187365] [<ffffffff80889862>] do_trap_ecall_u+0xbe/0x130 > > > > > [9.192922] [<ffffffff808920bc>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0x64 > > > > > [9.198573] Code: 0009 b7e9 6797 014d a783 85a7 c799 4785 0717 0100 (0123) aef7 > > > > > [9.205994] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- > > > > > > > > > > This is because we called riscv_noncoherent_supported() for all the stages > > > > > during IOCP probe. riscv_noncoherent_supported() function sets > > > > > noncoherent_supported variable to true which has an annotation set to > > > > > "__ro_after_init" due to which we were seeing the above splat. Fix this by > > > > > probing for IOCP only once in boot stage by having a boolean variable > > > > > is_iocp_probe_done which will be set to true upon IOCP probe in > > > > > errata_probe_iocp() and we bail out early if is_iocp_probe_done is set. > > > > > > > > > > While at it make return type of errata_probe_iocp() to void as we were > > > > > not checking the return value in andes_errata_patch_func(). > > > > > > > > > > Fixes: e021ae7f5145 ("riscv: errata: Add Andes alternative ports") > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> > > > > > --- > > > > > v1->v2 > > > > > * As RISCV_ALTERNATIVES_BOOT stage can happen twice add a is_iocp_probe_done > > > > > variable to probe for IOCP only once. > > > > > * Updated commit message > > > > > * Make return value of errata_probe_iocp() to void > > > > > > > > Thanks for the update! > > > > > > > > > --- a/arch/riscv/errata/andes/errata.c > > > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/errata/andes/errata.c > > > > > @@ -38,29 +38,36 @@ static long ax45mp_iocp_sw_workaround(void) > > > > > return ret.error ? 0 : ret.value; > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > -static bool errata_probe_iocp(unsigned int stage, unsigned long arch_id, unsigned long impid) > > > > > +static void errata_probe_iocp(unsigned int stage, unsigned long arch_id, unsigned long impid) > > > > > { > > > > > + static bool is_iocp_probe_done; > > > > > > > > done? > > > > > > > OK I'll rename it to "done". > > > > > > > > + > > > > > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ERRATA_ANDES_CMO)) > > > > > - return false; > > > > > + return; > > > > > + > > > > > + if (is_iocp_probe_done) > > > > > + return; > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why not keep it simple, and just do > > > > > > > > done = true; > > > > > > > OK. > > > > > > > here? > > > > Can arch_id or impid suddenly change, so you have to recheck? > > > I only check arch_id and impid here. Are you suggesting I drop it? > > > > No, I do not suggest to drop it. > > I suggested moving the "done = true" up, so the check is done only once. > > > OK, I'll have something like below: > > static void errata_probe_iocp(unsigned int stage, unsigned long > arch_id, unsigned long impid) > { > static bool done; > > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ERRATA_ANDES_CMO)) > return; > > if (done) > return; > > if (arch_id != ANDES_AX45MP_MARCHID || impid != ANDES_AX45MP_MIMPID) > return; Please move this check below "done = true", as there is no need to execute this check multiple times. > done = true; > > if (!ax45mp_iocp_sw_workaround()) > return; > > /* Set this just to make core cbo code happy */ > riscv_cbom_block_size = 1; > riscv_noncoherent_supported(); > } Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert
Hi Geert, On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 4:54 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > Hi Prabhakar, > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 5:50 PM Lad, Prabhakar > <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 4:26 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 5:23 PM Lad, Prabhakar > > > <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 2:34 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 1:56 PM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > We need to probe for IOCP only once during boot stage, as we were probing > > > > > > for IOCP for all the stages this caused the below issue during module-init > > > > > > stage, > > > > > > > > > > > > [9.019104] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffffffff8100d3a0 > > > > > > [9.027153] Oops [#1] > > > > > > [9.029421] Modules linked in: rcar_canfd renesas_usbhs i2c_riic can_dev spi_rspi i2c_core > > > > > > [9.037686] CPU: 0 PID: 90 Comm: udevd Not tainted 6.7.0-rc1+ #57 > > > > > > [9.043756] Hardware name: Renesas SMARC EVK based on r9a07g043f01 (DT) > > > > > > [9.050339] epc : riscv_noncoherent_supported+0x10/0x3e > > > > > > [9.055558] ra : andes_errata_patch_func+0x4a/0x52 > > > > > > [9.060418] epc : ffffffff8000d8c2 ra : ffffffff8000d95c sp : ffffffc8003abb00 > > > > > > [9.067607] gp : ffffffff814e25a0 tp : ffffffd80361e540 t0 : 0000000000000000 > > > > > > [9.074795] t1 : 000000000900031e t2 : 0000000000000001 s0 : ffffffc8003abb20 > > > > > > [9.081984] s1 : ffffffff015b57c7 a0 : 0000000000000000 a1 : 0000000000000001 > > > > > > [9.089172] a2 : 0000000000000000 a3 : 0000000000000000 a4 : ffffffff8100d8be > > > > > > [9.096360] a5 : 0000000000000001 a6 : 0000000000000001 a7 : 000000000900031e > > > > > > [9.103548] s2 : ffffffff015b57d7 s3 : 0000000000000001 s4 : 000000000000031e > > > > > > [9.110736] s5 : 8000000000008a45 s6 : 0000000000000500 s7 : 000000000000003f > > > > > > [9.117924] s8 : ffffffc8003abd48 s9 : ffffffff015b1140 s10: ffffffff8151a1b0 > > > > > > [9.125113] s11: ffffffff015b1000 t3 : 0000000000000001 t4 : fefefefefefefeff > > > > > > [9.132301] t5 : ffffffff015b57c7 t6 : ffffffd8b63a6000 > > > > > > [9.137587] status: 0000000200000120 badaddr: ffffffff8100d3a0 cause: 000000000000000f > > > > > > [9.145468] [<ffffffff8000d8c2>] riscv_noncoherent_supported+0x10/0x3e > > > > > > [9.151972] [<ffffffff800027e8>] _apply_alternatives+0x84/0x86 > > > > > > [9.157784] [<ffffffff800029be>] apply_module_alternatives+0x10/0x1a > > > > > > [9.164113] [<ffffffff80008fcc>] module_finalize+0x5e/0x7a > > > > > > [9.169583] [<ffffffff80085cd6>] load_module+0xfd8/0x179c > > > > > > [9.174965] [<ffffffff80086630>] init_module_from_file+0x76/0xaa > > > > > > [9.180948] [<ffffffff800867f6>] __riscv_sys_finit_module+0x176/0x2a8 > > > > > > [9.187365] [<ffffffff80889862>] do_trap_ecall_u+0xbe/0x130 > > > > > > [9.192922] [<ffffffff808920bc>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0x64 > > > > > > [9.198573] Code: 0009 b7e9 6797 014d a783 85a7 c799 4785 0717 0100 (0123) aef7 > > > > > > [9.205994] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- > > > > > > > > > > > > This is because we called riscv_noncoherent_supported() for all the stages > > > > > > during IOCP probe. riscv_noncoherent_supported() function sets > > > > > > noncoherent_supported variable to true which has an annotation set to > > > > > > "__ro_after_init" due to which we were seeing the above splat. Fix this by > > > > > > probing for IOCP only once in boot stage by having a boolean variable > > > > > > is_iocp_probe_done which will be set to true upon IOCP probe in > > > > > > errata_probe_iocp() and we bail out early if is_iocp_probe_done is set. > > > > > > > > > > > > While at it make return type of errata_probe_iocp() to void as we were > > > > > > not checking the return value in andes_errata_patch_func(). > > > > > > > > > > > > Fixes: e021ae7f5145 ("riscv: errata: Add Andes alternative ports") > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> > > > > > > --- > > > > > > v1->v2 > > > > > > * As RISCV_ALTERNATIVES_BOOT stage can happen twice add a is_iocp_probe_done > > > > > > variable to probe for IOCP only once. > > > > > > * Updated commit message > > > > > > * Make return value of errata_probe_iocp() to void > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the update! > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/arch/riscv/errata/andes/errata.c > > > > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/errata/andes/errata.c > > > > > > @@ -38,29 +38,36 @@ static long ax45mp_iocp_sw_workaround(void) > > > > > > return ret.error ? 0 : ret.value; > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > -static bool errata_probe_iocp(unsigned int stage, unsigned long arch_id, unsigned long impid) > > > > > > +static void errata_probe_iocp(unsigned int stage, unsigned long arch_id, unsigned long impid) > > > > > > { > > > > > > + static bool is_iocp_probe_done; > > > > > > > > > > done? > > > > > > > > > OK I'll rename it to "done". > > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ERRATA_ANDES_CMO)) > > > > > > - return false; > > > > > > + return; > > > > > > + > > > > > > + if (is_iocp_probe_done) > > > > > > + return; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why not keep it simple, and just do > > > > > > > > > > done = true; > > > > > > > > > OK. > > > > > > > > > here? > > > > > Can arch_id or impid suddenly change, so you have to recheck? > > > > I only check arch_id and impid here. Are you suggesting I drop it? > > > > > > No, I do not suggest to drop it. > > > I suggested moving the "done = true" up, so the check is done only once. > > > > > OK, I'll have something like below: > > > > static void errata_probe_iocp(unsigned int stage, unsigned long > > arch_id, unsigned long impid) > > { > > static bool done; > > > > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ERRATA_ANDES_CMO)) > > return; > > > > if (done) > > return; > > > > if (arch_id != ANDES_AX45MP_MARCHID || impid != ANDES_AX45MP_MIMPID) > > return; > > Please move this check below "done = true", as there is no need to > execute this check multiple times. > OK, will do. Cheers, Prabhakar
diff --git a/arch/riscv/errata/andes/errata.c b/arch/riscv/errata/andes/errata.c index 197db68cc8da..b8eadb3b10d8 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/errata/andes/errata.c +++ b/arch/riscv/errata/andes/errata.c @@ -38,29 +38,36 @@ static long ax45mp_iocp_sw_workaround(void) return ret.error ? 0 : ret.value; } -static bool errata_probe_iocp(unsigned int stage, unsigned long arch_id, unsigned long impid) +static void errata_probe_iocp(unsigned int stage, unsigned long arch_id, unsigned long impid) { + static bool is_iocp_probe_done; + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ERRATA_ANDES_CMO)) - return false; + return; + + if (is_iocp_probe_done) + return; if (arch_id != ANDESTECH_AX45MP_MARCHID || impid != ANDESTECH_AX45MP_MIMPID) - return false; + return; - if (!ax45mp_iocp_sw_workaround()) - return false; + if (!ax45mp_iocp_sw_workaround()) { + is_iocp_probe_done = true; + return; + } /* Set this just to make core cbo code happy */ riscv_cbom_block_size = 1; riscv_noncoherent_supported(); - - return true; + is_iocp_probe_done = true; } void __init_or_module andes_errata_patch_func(struct alt_entry *begin, struct alt_entry *end, unsigned long archid, unsigned long impid, unsigned int stage) { - errata_probe_iocp(stage, archid, impid); + if (stage == RISCV_ALTERNATIVES_BOOT) + errata_probe_iocp(stage, archid, impid); /* we have nothing to patch here ATM so just return back */ }