Message ID | 20231204104534.1335903-1-mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | xhci features for usb-next | expand |
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 12:45:16PM +0200, Mathias Nyman wrote: > Hi Greg > > V2 of xhci features and cleanups for usb-next, including xhci dbc > cleanups, MSI rework, and fixing how we reconfigure max packet size > for xhc. > > One patch fixes a null pointer deref issue, but this hasn't been seen > in real life. It's a theoretical case triggered by adding a 3 second > delay in the driver. > So I don't think it should go to stable. > > v2 drops one small cleanup patch as it turned out to not really clarify or > simplify things. This was [PATCH 08/19] "xhci: dbc: Use sizeof_field() > where it makes sense" in previous series. > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20231201150647.1307406-9-mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com Ick, I just applied all of the v1 series, we crossed emails, sorry, my fault. But, to be fair, I think your patch is correct, so let me leave it in, if it's not buggy. thanks, greg k-h
On 4.12.2023 15.20, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 12:45:16PM +0200, Mathias Nyman wrote: >> Hi Greg >> >> V2 of xhci features and cleanups for usb-next, including xhci dbc >> cleanups, MSI rework, and fixing how we reconfigure max packet size >> for xhc. >> >> One patch fixes a null pointer deref issue, but this hasn't been seen >> in real life. It's a theoretical case triggered by adding a 3 second >> delay in the driver. >> So I don't think it should go to stable. >> >> v2 drops one small cleanup patch as it turned out to not really clarify or >> simplify things. This was [PATCH 08/19] "xhci: dbc: Use sizeof_field() >> where it makes sense" in previous series. >> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20231201150647.1307406-9-mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com > > Ick, I just applied all of the v1 series, we crossed emails, sorry, my > fault. > > But, to be fair, I think your patch is correct, so let me leave it in, > if it's not buggy. > Yes, it should work just fine. It can be optimized later if someone is still interested. Thanks Mathias