Message ID | 20231130214959.27377-1-donald.hunter@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | tools/net/ynl: Add 'sub-message' support to ynl | expand |
Hello: This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main) by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>: On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 21:49:52 +0000 you wrote: > This patchset adds a 'sub-message' attribute type to the netlink-raw > schema and implements it in ynl. This provides support for kind-specific > options attributes as used in rt_link and tc raw netlink families. > > A description of the new 'sub-message' attribute type and the > corresponding sub-message definitions is provided in patch 2. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [net-next,v1,1/6] doc/netlink: Add bitfield32, s8, s16 to the netlink-raw schema https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/527d2cd8b852 - [net-next,v1,2/6] doc/netlink: Add sub-message support to netlink-raw (no matching commit) - [net-next,v1,3/6] tools/net/ynl: Add 'sub-message' attribute decoding to ynl (no matching commit) - [net-next,v1,4/6] tools/net/ynl: Add binary and pad support to structs for tc (no matching commit) - [net-next,v1,5/6] doc/netlink/specs: add sub-message type to rt_link family (no matching commit) - [net-next,v1,6/6] doc/netlink/specs: Add a spec for tc (no matching commit) You are awesome, thank you!
On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 21:49:52 +0000 Donald Hunter wrote: > Documentation/netlink/specs/rt_link.yaml | 273 ++- > Documentation/netlink/specs/tc.yaml | 2008 ++++++++++++++++++++++ Should we add sub-messages to tools/net/ynl/ynl-gen-rst.py ? Does the output look sane with the new attributes?
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> writes: > On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 21:49:52 +0000 Donald Hunter wrote: >> Documentation/netlink/specs/rt_link.yaml | 273 ++- >> Documentation/netlink/specs/tc.yaml | 2008 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Should we add sub-messages to tools/net/ynl/ynl-gen-rst.py ? > Does the output look sane with the new attributes? Ah, yes we should. Okay if I look at this as a followup patch?
On Mon, 04 Dec 2023 15:54:13 +0000 Donald Hunter wrote: > > Should we add sub-messages to tools/net/ynl/ynl-gen-rst.py ? > > Does the output look sane with the new attributes? > > Ah, yes we should. Okay if I look at this as a followup patch? Improving looks is 100% fine as a follow up. But do check we don't break rendering completely for stuff we should already support when sub-messages appear.