Message ID | 20231205001620.4566-1-spasswolf@web.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | fs: read_write: make default in vfs_copy_file_range() reachable | expand |
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 2:16 AM Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@web.de> wrote: > > If vfs_copy_file_range() is called with (flags & COPY_FILE_SPLICE == 0) > and both file_out->f_op->copy_file_range and file_in->f_op->remap_file_range > are NULL, too, the default call to do_splice_direct() cannot be reached. > This patch adds an else clause to make the default reachable in all > cases. > > Signed-off-by: Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@web.de> Hi Bert, Thank you for testing and reporting this so early!! I would edit the commit message differently, but anyway, I think that the fix should be folded into commit 05ee2d85cd4a ("fs: use do_splice_direct() for nfsd/ksmbd server-side-copy"). Since I end up making a mistake every time I touch this code, I also added a small edit to your patch below, that should make the logic more clear to readers. Hopefully, that will help me avoid making a mistake the next time I touch this code... Would you mind testing my revised fix, so we can add: Tested-by: Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@web.de> when folding it into the original patch? Thanks, Amir. > --- > fs/read_write.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c > index e0c2c1b5962b..3599c54bd26d 100644 > --- a/fs/read_write.c > +++ b/fs/read_write.c > @@ -1554,6 +1554,8 @@ ssize_t vfs_copy_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in, > /* fallback to splice */ > if (ret <= 0) > splice = true; > + } else { This is logically correct because of the earlier "same sb" check in generic_copy_file_checks(), but we better spell out the logic here as well: + } else if (file_inode(file_in)->i_sb == file_inode(file_out)->i_sb) { + /* Fallback to splice for same sb copy for backward compat */ > + splice = true; > } > > file_end_write(file_out); > -- > 2.39.2 > > Since linux-next-20231204 I noticed that it was impossible to start the > game Path of Exile (using the steam client). I bisected the error to > commit 05ee2d85cd4ace5cd37dc24132e3fd7f5142ebef. Reverting this commit > in linux-next-20231204 made the game start again and after inserting > printks into vfs_copy_file_range() I found that steam (via python3) > calls this function with (flags & COPY_FILE_SPLICE == 0), > file_out->f_op->copy_file_range == NULL and > file_in->f_op->remap_file_range == NULL so the default is never reached. > This patch adds a catch all else clause so the default is reached in > all cases. This patch fixes the describe issue with steam and Path of > Exile. > > Bert Karwatzki
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 5:45 AM Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 2:16 AM Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@web.de> wrote: > > > > If vfs_copy_file_range() is called with (flags & COPY_FILE_SPLICE == 0) > > and both file_out->f_op->copy_file_range and file_in->f_op->remap_file_range > > are NULL, too, the default call to do_splice_direct() cannot be reached. > > This patch adds an else clause to make the default reachable in all > > cases. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@web.de> > > Hi Bert, > > Thank you for testing and reporting this so early!! > > I would edit the commit message differently, but anyway, I think that > the fix should be folded into commit 05ee2d85cd4a ("fs: use > do_splice_direct() for nfsd/ksmbd server-side-copy"). > > Since I end up making a mistake every time I touch this code, > I also added a small edit to your patch below, that should make the logic > more clear to readers. Hopefully, that will help me avoid making a mistake > the next time I touch this code... > > Would you mind testing my revised fix, so we can add: > Tested-by: Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@web.de> > when folding it into the original patch? > Attached an even cleaner version of the fix patch for you to test. I tested fstests check -g copy_range on ext4. My fault was that I had tested earlier only on xfs and overlayfs (the two other cases in the if/else if statement). Thanks, Amir. > > --- > > fs/read_write.c | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c > > index e0c2c1b5962b..3599c54bd26d 100644 > > --- a/fs/read_write.c > > +++ b/fs/read_write.c > > @@ -1554,6 +1554,8 @@ ssize_t vfs_copy_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in, > > /* fallback to splice */ > > if (ret <= 0) > > splice = true; > > + } else { > > This is logically correct because of the earlier "same sb" check in > generic_copy_file_checks(), but we better spell out the logic here as well: > > + } else if (file_inode(file_in)->i_sb == > file_inode(file_out)->i_sb) { > + /* Fallback to splice for same sb copy for > backward compat */ > > > + splice = true; > > } > > > > file_end_write(file_out); > > -- > > 2.39.2 > > > > Since linux-next-20231204 I noticed that it was impossible to start the > > game Path of Exile (using the steam client). I bisected the error to > > commit 05ee2d85cd4ace5cd37dc24132e3fd7f5142ebef. Reverting this commit > > in linux-next-20231204 made the game start again and after inserting > > printks into vfs_copy_file_range() I found that steam (via python3) > > calls this function with (flags & COPY_FILE_SPLICE == 0), > > file_out->f_op->copy_file_range == NULL and > > file_in->f_op->remap_file_range == NULL so the default is never reached. > > This patch adds a catch all else clause so the default is reached in > > all cases. This patch fixes the describe issue with steam and Path of > > Exile. > > > > Bert Karwatzki
Am Dienstag, dem 05.12.2023 um 07:01 +0200 schrieb Amir Goldstein: > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 5:45 AM Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 2:16 AM Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@web.de> wrote: > > > > > > If vfs_copy_file_range() is called with (flags & COPY_FILE_SPLICE == 0) > > > and both file_out->f_op->copy_file_range and file_in->f_op- > > > >remap_file_range > > > are NULL, too, the default call to do_splice_direct() cannot be reached. > > > This patch adds an else clause to make the default reachable in all > > > cases. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@web.de> > > > > Hi Bert, > > > > Thank you for testing and reporting this so early!! > > > > I would edit the commit message differently, but anyway, I think that > > the fix should be folded into commit 05ee2d85cd4a ("fs: use > > do_splice_direct() for nfsd/ksmbd server-side-copy"). > > > > Since I end up making a mistake every time I touch this code, > > I also added a small edit to your patch below, that should make the logic > > more clear to readers. Hopefully, that will help me avoid making a mistake > > the next time I touch this code... > > > > Would you mind testing my revised fix, so we can add: > > Tested-by: Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@web.de> > > when folding it into the original patch? > > > > Attached an even cleaner version of the fix patch for you to test. > I tested fstests check -g copy_range on ext4. > My fault was that I had tested earlier only on xfs and overlayfs > (the two other cases in the if/else if statement). > > Thanks, > Amir. > > > > --- > > > fs/read_write.c | 2 ++ > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c > > > index e0c2c1b5962b..3599c54bd26d 100644 > > > --- a/fs/read_write.c > > > +++ b/fs/read_write.c > > > @@ -1554,6 +1554,8 @@ ssize_t vfs_copy_file_range(struct file *file_in, > > > loff_t pos_in, > > > /* fallback to splice */ > > > if (ret <= 0) > > > splice = true; > > > + } else { > > > > This is logically correct because of the earlier "same sb" check in > > generic_copy_file_checks(), but we better spell out the logic here as well: > > > > + } else if (file_inode(file_in)->i_sb == > > file_inode(file_out)->i_sb) { > > + /* Fallback to splice for same sb copy for > > backward compat */ > > > > > + splice = true; > > > } > > > > > > file_end_write(file_out); > > > -- > > > 2.39.2 > > > > > > Since linux-next-20231204 I noticed that it was impossible to start the > > > game Path of Exile (using the steam client). I bisected the error to > > > commit 05ee2d85cd4ace5cd37dc24132e3fd7f5142ebef. Reverting this commit > > > in linux-next-20231204 made the game start again and after inserting > > > printks into vfs_copy_file_range() I found that steam (via python3) > > > calls this function with (flags & COPY_FILE_SPLICE == 0), > > > file_out->f_op->copy_file_range == NULL and > > > file_in->f_op->remap_file_range == NULL so the default is never reached. > > > This patch adds a catch all else clause so the default is reached in > > > all cases. This patch fixes the describe issue with steam and Path of > > > Exile. > > > > > > Bert Karwatzki Your new patch works fine (I applied it to linux-next-20231204), again tested by starting Path of Exile via steam from an ext4 filesystem. Bert Karwatzki
diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c index e0c2c1b5962b..3599c54bd26d 100644 --- a/fs/read_write.c +++ b/fs/read_write.c @@ -1554,6 +1554,8 @@ ssize_t vfs_copy_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in, /* fallback to splice */ if (ret <= 0) splice = true; + } else { + splice = true; } file_end_write(file_out);
If vfs_copy_file_range() is called with (flags & COPY_FILE_SPLICE == 0) and both file_out->f_op->copy_file_range and file_in->f_op->remap_file_range are NULL, too, the default call to do_splice_direct() cannot be reached. This patch adds an else clause to make the default reachable in all cases. Signed-off-by: Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@web.de> --- fs/read_write.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) -- 2.39.2 Since linux-next-20231204 I noticed that it was impossible to start the game Path of Exile (using the steam client). I bisected the error to commit 05ee2d85cd4ace5cd37dc24132e3fd7f5142ebef. Reverting this commit in linux-next-20231204 made the game start again and after inserting printks into vfs_copy_file_range() I found that steam (via python3) calls this function with (flags & COPY_FILE_SPLICE == 0), file_out->f_op->copy_file_range == NULL and file_in->f_op->remap_file_range == NULL so the default is never reached. This patch adds a catch all else clause so the default is reached in all cases. This patch fixes the describe issue with steam and Path of Exile. Bert Karwatzki