Context |
Check |
Description |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR |
success
|
PR summary
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 |
success
|
Logs for Lint
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 |
success
|
Logs for ShellCheck
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 |
success
|
Logs for Validate matrix.py
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 |
success
|
Logs for set-matrix
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-16
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
|
netdev/series_format |
success
|
Posting correctly formatted
|
netdev/tree_selection |
success
|
Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
|
netdev/ynl |
success
|
SINGLE THREAD;
Generated files up to date;
no warnings/errors;
no diff in generated;
|
netdev/fixes_present |
success
|
Fixes tag not required for -next series
|
netdev/header_inline |
success
|
No static functions without inline keyword in header files
|
netdev/build_32bit |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 2659 this patch: 2659
|
netdev/cc_maintainers |
warning
|
14 maintainers not CCed: haoluo@google.com jolsa@kernel.org kpsingh@kernel.org linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org martin.lau@linux.dev mykolal@fb.com john.fastabend@gmail.com song@kernel.org void@manifault.com eddyz87@gmail.com shuah@kernel.org sdf@google.com yonghong.song@linux.dev joannelkoong@gmail.com
|
netdev/build_clang |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 1276 this patch: 1276
|
netdev/verify_signedoff |
success
|
Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
|
netdev/deprecated_api |
success
|
None detected
|
netdev/check_selftest |
success
|
No net selftest shell script
|
netdev/verify_fixes |
success
|
No Fixes tag
|
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 2736 this patch: 2736
|
netdev/checkpatch |
warning
|
WARNING: line length of 84 exceeds 80 columns
WARNING: line length of 91 exceeds 80 columns
|
netdev/build_clang_rust |
success
|
No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
|
netdev/kdoc |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
|
netdev/source_inline |
success
|
Was 0 now: 0
|
@@ -2427,8 +2427,6 @@ int btf_distill_func_proto(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
struct btf_func_model *m);
struct bpf_reg_state;
-int btf_check_subprog_arg_match(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int subprog,
- struct bpf_reg_state *regs);
int btf_check_subprog_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int subprog,
struct bpf_reg_state *regs);
int btf_prepare_func_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int subprog);
@@ -6768,8 +6768,7 @@ int btf_check_type_match(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, const struct bpf_prog *pr
static int btf_check_func_arg_match(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
const struct btf *btf, u32 func_id,
struct bpf_reg_state *regs,
- bool ptr_to_mem_ok,
- bool processing_call)
+ bool ptr_to_mem_ok)
{
enum bpf_prog_type prog_type = resolve_prog_type(env->prog);
struct bpf_verifier_log *log = &env->log;
@@ -6842,7 +6841,7 @@ static int btf_check_func_arg_match(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
i, btf_type_str(t));
return -EINVAL;
}
- } else if (ptr_to_mem_ok && processing_call) {
+ } else if (ptr_to_mem_ok) {
const struct btf_type *resolve_ret;
u32 type_size;
@@ -6867,55 +6866,12 @@ static int btf_check_func_arg_match(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
return 0;
}
-/* Compare BTF of a function declaration with given bpf_reg_state.
- * Returns:
- * EFAULT - there is a verifier bug. Abort verification.
- * EINVAL - there is a type mismatch or BTF is not available.
- * 0 - BTF matches with what bpf_reg_state expects.
- * Only PTR_TO_CTX and SCALAR_VALUE states are recognized.
- */
-int btf_check_subprog_arg_match(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int subprog,
- struct bpf_reg_state *regs)
-{
- struct bpf_prog *prog = env->prog;
- struct btf *btf = prog->aux->btf;
- bool is_global;
- u32 btf_id;
- int err;
-
- if (!prog->aux->func_info)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- btf_id = prog->aux->func_info[subprog].type_id;
- if (!btf_id)
- return -EFAULT;
-
- if (prog->aux->func_info_aux[subprog].unreliable)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- is_global = prog->aux->func_info_aux[subprog].linkage == BTF_FUNC_GLOBAL;
- err = btf_check_func_arg_match(env, btf, btf_id, regs, is_global, false);
-
- /* Compiler optimizations can remove arguments from static functions
- * or mismatched type can be passed into a global function.
- * In such cases mark the function as unreliable from BTF point of view.
- */
- if (err)
- prog->aux->func_info_aux[subprog].unreliable = true;
- return err;
-}
-
/* Compare BTF of a function call with given bpf_reg_state.
* Returns:
* EFAULT - there is a verifier bug. Abort verification.
* EINVAL - there is a type mismatch or BTF is not available.
* 0 - BTF matches with what bpf_reg_state expects.
* Only PTR_TO_CTX and SCALAR_VALUE states are recognized.
- *
- * NOTE: the code is duplicated from btf_check_subprog_arg_match()
- * because btf_check_func_arg_match() is still doing both. Once that
- * function is split in 2, we can call from here btf_check_subprog_arg_match()
- * first, and then treat the calling part in a new code path.
*/
int btf_check_subprog_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int subprog,
struct bpf_reg_state *regs)
@@ -6937,7 +6893,7 @@ int btf_check_subprog_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int subprog,
return -EINVAL;
is_global = prog->aux->func_info_aux[subprog].linkage == BTF_FUNC_GLOBAL;
- err = btf_check_func_arg_match(env, btf, btf_id, regs, is_global, true);
+ err = btf_check_func_arg_match(env, btf, btf_id, regs, is_global);
/* Compiler optimizations can remove arguments from static functions
* or mismatched type can be passed into a global function.
@@ -19899,18 +19899,6 @@ static int do_check_common(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int subprog)
/* 1st arg to a function */
regs[BPF_REG_1].type = PTR_TO_CTX;
mark_reg_known_zero(env, regs, BPF_REG_1);
- ret = btf_check_subprog_arg_match(env, subprog, regs);
- if (ret == -EFAULT)
- /* unlikely verifier bug. abort.
- * ret == 0 and ret < 0 are sadly acceptable for
- * main() function due to backward compatibility.
- * Like socket filter program may be written as:
- * int bpf_prog(struct pt_regs *ctx)
- * and never dereference that ctx in the program.
- * 'struct pt_regs' is a type mismatch for socket
- * filter that should be using 'struct __sk_buff'.
- */
- goto out;
}
ret = do_check(env);
@@ -169,9 +169,9 @@ void test_log_fixup(void)
if (test__start_subtest("bad_core_relo_trunc_none"))
bad_core_relo(0, TRUNC_NONE /* full buf */);
if (test__start_subtest("bad_core_relo_trunc_partial"))
- bad_core_relo(300, TRUNC_PARTIAL /* truncate original log a bit */);
+ bad_core_relo(250, TRUNC_PARTIAL /* truncate original log a bit */);
if (test__start_subtest("bad_core_relo_trunc_full"))
- bad_core_relo(210, TRUNC_FULL /* truncate also libbpf's message patch */);
+ bad_core_relo(170, TRUNC_FULL /* truncate also libbpf's message patch */);
if (test__start_subtest("bad_core_relo_subprog"))
bad_core_relo_subprog();
if (test__start_subtest("missing_map"))
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(cgrp_kfunc_acquire_fp, struct cgroup *cgrp, const char *path)
}
SEC("kretprobe/cgroup_destroy_locked")
-__failure __msg("reg type unsupported for arg#0 function")
+__failure __msg("calling kernel function bpf_cgroup_acquire is not allowed")
int BPF_PROG(cgrp_kfunc_acquire_unsafe_kretprobe, struct cgroup *cgrp)
{
struct cgroup *acquired;
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_from_pid_no_null_check, struct task_struct *task, u64 cl
}
SEC("lsm/task_free")
-__failure __msg("reg type unsupported for arg#0 function")
+__failure __msg("R1 must be a rcu pointer")
int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_from_lsm_task_free, struct task_struct *task)
{
struct task_struct *acquired;
We ignore results of BTF check anyway, often times producing confusing and ominously-sounding "reg type unsupported for arg#0 function" message, which has no apparent effect on program correctness and verification process. All the -EFAULT returning sanity checks are already performed in check_btf_info_early(), so there is zero reason to have this duplication of logic between btf_check_subprog_call() and btf_check_subprog_arg_match(). Dropping btf_check_subprog_arg_match() simplifies btf_check_func_arg_match() further removing `bool processing_call` flag. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> --- include/linux/bpf.h | 2 - kernel/bpf/btf.c | 50 ++----------------- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 12 ----- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/log_fixup.c | 4 +- .../selftests/bpf/progs/cgrp_kfunc_failure.c | 2 +- .../selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c | 2 +- 6 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)