mbox series

[v2,0/3] supplement of slab allocator removal

Message ID 20231203001501.126339-1-sxwjean@me.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series supplement of slab allocator removal | expand

Message

Xiongwei Song Dec. 3, 2023, 12:14 a.m. UTC
From: Xiongwei Song <xiongwei.song@windriver.com>

Hi,

Patch 1 is to remove an unused parameter. This patch actually is v3, but
it is not reasonable to add v3 tag in the cover letter, so I put the
change history inside the patch.

---
Patch 2 is to replace slub_$params with slab_$params.
Vlastimil Babka pointed out we should use "slab_$param" as the primary
prefix for long-term plan. Please see [1] for more information.

This patch is to do that. However, the patch is big, I'm not sure if
everything is proper in it, so I added "RFC" in the patch title. For more
information please see the commit message of patch.

I did the basic tests with qemu, which passed values by sl[au]b_max_order,
sl[au]b_min_order, sl[au]b_min_objects and sl[au]b_debug in command line.
The values looks correct by printing them out before calculating orders.

One thing I'm not sure about the forth parameter of __setup_param(),
Is it correct to set the parameter to 0 directly?

---
Patch 3 is not related to slab allocator removal. It's to correct the
description of default value of slub_min_objects in
Documentation/mm/slub.rst. 

---
CHANGES
v2:
- patch 1: Collect Reviewed-by tag.
- patch 3: Correct spelling mistakes in commit message.

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20231201031505.286117-1-sxwjean@me.com/

---
Regards,
Xiongwei

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/7512b350-4317-21a0-fab3-4101bc4d8f7a@suse.cz/

Xiongwei Song (3):
  Documentation: kernel-parameters: remove noaliencache
  mm/slub: unify all sl[au]b parameters with "slab_$param"
  mm/slub: correct the default value of slub_min_objects in doc

 .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         |  48 +++---
 Documentation/mm/slub.rst                     |   2 +-
 drivers/misc/lkdtm/heap.c                     |   2 +-
 mm/Kconfig.debug                              |   6 +-
 mm/slab.h                                     |  16 +-
 mm/slab_common.c                              |   8 +-
 mm/slub.c                                     | 142 +++++++++---------
 7 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 114 deletions(-)

Comments

Vlastimil Babka Dec. 6, 2023, 4:13 p.m. UTC | #1
On 12/3/23 01:14, sxwjean@me.com wrote:
> From: Xiongwei Song <xiongwei.song@windriver.com>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Patch 1 is to remove an unused parameter. This patch actually is v3, but
> it is not reasonable to add v3 tag in the cover letter, so I put the
> change history inside the patch.
> 
> ---
> Patch 2 is to replace slub_$params with slab_$params.
> Vlastimil Babka pointed out we should use "slab_$param" as the primary
> prefix for long-term plan. Please see [1] for more information.
> 
> This patch is to do that. However, the patch is big, I'm not sure if
> everything is proper in it, so I added "RFC" in the patch title. For more
> information please see the commit message of patch.
> 
> I did the basic tests with qemu, which passed values by sl[au]b_max_order,
> sl[au]b_min_order, sl[au]b_min_objects and sl[au]b_debug in command line.
> The values looks correct by printing them out before calculating orders.
> 
> One thing I'm not sure about the forth parameter of __setup_param(),
> Is it correct to set the parameter to 0 directly?

Yep it's fine.
Song, Xiongwei Dec. 8, 2023, 2:03 a.m. UTC | #2
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2023 12:13 AM
> To: sxwjean@me.com; 42.hyeyoo@gmail.com; cl@linux.com; linux-
> mm@kvack.org
> Cc: penberg@kernel.org; rientjes@google.com; iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com;
> roman.gushchin@linux.dev; corbet@lwn.net; keescook@chromium.org;
> arnd@arndb.de; akpm@linux-foundation.org; gregkh@linuxfoundation.org;
> linux-doc@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Song, Xiongwei
> <Xiongwei.Song@windriver.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] supplement of slab allocator removal
> 
> On 12/3/23 01:14, sxwjean@me.com wrote:
> > From: Xiongwei Song <xiongwei.song@windriver.com>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Patch 1 is to remove an unused parameter. This patch actually is v3, but
> > it is not reasonable to add v3 tag in the cover letter, so I put the
> > change history inside the patch.
> >
> > ---
> > Patch 2 is to replace slub_$params with slab_$params.
> > Vlastimil Babka pointed out we should use "slab_$param" as the primary
> > prefix for long-term plan. Please see [1] for more information.
> >
> > This patch is to do that. However, the patch is big, I'm not sure if
> > everything is proper in it, so I added "RFC" in the patch title. For more
> > information please see the commit message of patch.
> >
> > I did the basic tests with qemu, which passed values by sl[au]b_max_order,
> > sl[au]b_min_order, sl[au]b_min_objects and sl[au]b_debug in command
> line.
> > The values looks correct by printing them out before calculating orders.
> >
> > One thing I'm not sure about the forth parameter of __setup_param(),
> > Is it correct to set the parameter to 0 directly?
> 
> Yep it's fine.

Thanks for the confirmation.