| Message ID | 20231127-master-v1-1-5786ec1c6d38@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | autoconf: don't build nfsdcltrack by default | expand |
Hey Jeff! On 11/27/23 10:18 AM, Jeff Layton wrote: > Now that we've started the process to remove legacy v4 client tracking > methods, let's stop building nfsdcltrack by default. > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> > --- > configure.ac | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac > index 93a1202807ea..62c833cc2409 100644 > --- a/configure.ac > +++ b/configure.ac > @@ -248,9 +248,9 @@ AC_ARG_ENABLE(nfsrahead, > fi > > AC_ARG_ENABLE(nfsdcltrack, > - [AS_HELP_STRING([--disable-nfsdcltrack],[disable NFSv4 clientid tracking programs @<:@default=no@:>@])], > + [AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-nfsdcltrack],[enable NFSv4 clientid tracking programs @<:@default=no@:>@])], > enable_nfsdcltrack=$enableval, > - enable_nfsdcltrack="yes") > + enable_nfsdcltrack="no") > > AC_ARG_ENABLE(nfsv4server, > [AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-nfsv4server],[enable support for NFSv4 only server @<:@default=no@:>@])], > > --- > base-commit: cc5cccbb9f24a2324f50a5cb4c29d83fdf6b1f90 > change-id: 20231127-master-5ef1c15da9c4 > > Best regards, Quick Question... Should we remove the code or just turn off the building as this patch does? stesved.
On Thu, 2023-12-07 at 14:42 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: > Hey Jeff! > > On 11/27/23 10:18 AM, Jeff Layton wrote: > > Now that we've started the process to remove legacy v4 client tracking > > methods, let's stop building nfsdcltrack by default. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> > > --- > > configure.ac | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac > > index 93a1202807ea..62c833cc2409 100644 > > --- a/configure.ac > > +++ b/configure.ac > > @@ -248,9 +248,9 @@ AC_ARG_ENABLE(nfsrahead, > > fi > > > > AC_ARG_ENABLE(nfsdcltrack, > > - [AS_HELP_STRING([--disable-nfsdcltrack],[disable NFSv4 clientid tracking programs @<:@default=no@:>@])], > > + [AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-nfsdcltrack],[enable NFSv4 clientid tracking programs @<:@default=no@:>@])], > > enable_nfsdcltrack=$enableval, > > - enable_nfsdcltrack="yes") > > + enable_nfsdcltrack="no") > > > > AC_ARG_ENABLE(nfsv4server, > > [AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-nfsv4server],[enable support for NFSv4 only server @<:@default=no@:>@])], > > > > --- > > base-commit: cc5cccbb9f24a2324f50a5cb4c29d83fdf6b1f90 > > change-id: 20231127-master-5ef1c15da9c4 > > > > Best regards, > Quick Question... Should we remove the code or just > turn off the building as this patch does? > > stesved. > Eventually, I think we'll want to remove nfsdcltrack entirely, but I think we shouldn't do that right away, without announcing it first and giving distros some warning. Since we're on the subject, how long should we wait before fully deprecating it? A year? 2 or 3 releases? What makes sense? Maybe we should have configure spew a warning about its impending removal when someone enables it too?
Hey On 12/7/23 3:14 PM, Jeff Layton wrote: > On Thu, 2023-12-07 at 14:42 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: >> Hey Jeff! >> >> On 11/27/23 10:18 AM, Jeff Layton wrote: >>> Now that we've started the process to remove legacy v4 client tracking >>> methods, let's stop building nfsdcltrack by default. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> >>> --- >>> configure.ac | 4 ++-- >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac >>> index 93a1202807ea..62c833cc2409 100644 >>> --- a/configure.ac >>> +++ b/configure.ac >>> @@ -248,9 +248,9 @@ AC_ARG_ENABLE(nfsrahead, >>> fi >>> >>> AC_ARG_ENABLE(nfsdcltrack, >>> - [AS_HELP_STRING([--disable-nfsdcltrack],[disable NFSv4 clientid tracking programs @<:@default=no@:>@])], >>> + [AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-nfsdcltrack],[enable NFSv4 clientid tracking programs @<:@default=no@:>@])], >>> enable_nfsdcltrack=$enableval, >>> - enable_nfsdcltrack="yes") >>> + enable_nfsdcltrack="no") >>> >>> AC_ARG_ENABLE(nfsv4server, >>> [AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-nfsv4server],[enable support for NFSv4 only server @<:@default=no@:>@])], >>> >>> --- >>> base-commit: cc5cccbb9f24a2324f50a5cb4c29d83fdf6b1f90 >>> change-id: 20231127-master-5ef1c15da9c4 >>> >>> Best regards, >> Quick Question... Should we remove the code or just >> turn off the building as this patch does? >> >> steved. >> > > Eventually, I think we'll want to remove nfsdcltrack entirely, but I > think we shouldn't do that right away, without announcing it first and > giving distros some warning. > > Since we're on the subject, how long should we wait before fully > deprecating it? A year? 2 or 3 releases? What makes sense? Well, I was planning on make a new release (nfs-utils-2-7-1) when I took the patch... So I guess turning the build off for now makes sense... just to see what happens. > > Maybe we should have configure spew a warning about its impending > removal when someone enables it too? Hmm... If it is not needed... why go through the effort? I've always been a fan of... a clean cut! :-) steved.
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 93a1202807ea..62c833cc2409 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -248,9 +248,9 @@ AC_ARG_ENABLE(nfsrahead, fi AC_ARG_ENABLE(nfsdcltrack, - [AS_HELP_STRING([--disable-nfsdcltrack],[disable NFSv4 clientid tracking programs @<:@default=no@:>@])], + [AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-nfsdcltrack],[enable NFSv4 clientid tracking programs @<:@default=no@:>@])], enable_nfsdcltrack=$enableval, - enable_nfsdcltrack="yes") + enable_nfsdcltrack="no") AC_ARG_ENABLE(nfsv4server, [AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-nfsv4server],[enable support for NFSv4 only server @<:@default=no@:>@])],
Now that we've started the process to remove legacy v4 client tracking methods, let's stop building nfsdcltrack by default. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> --- configure.ac | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- base-commit: cc5cccbb9f24a2324f50a5cb4c29d83fdf6b1f90 change-id: 20231127-master-5ef1c15da9c4 Best regards,