| Message ID | 20231208-unripe-maximum-fc77f4967561@spud (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable |
| Headers | show |
| Series | MPFS clock fixes required for correct CAN clock modeling | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| netdev/tree_selection | success | Not a local patch |
Conor Dooley wrote: > From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > > There are 3 undocumented outputs of the MSSPLL that are used for the CAN > bus, "user crypto" module and eMMC. Add their clock IDs so that they can > be hooked up in DT. > > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > --- > include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h > index 79775a5134ca..b52f19a2b480 100644 > --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h > @@ -44,6 +44,11 @@ > > #define CLK_RTCREF 33 > #define CLK_MSSPLL 34 > +#define CLK_MSSPLL0 34 You add this new CLK_MSSPLL0 macro with the same value as CLK_MSSPLL, but never seem to use it in this series. Did you mean to rename the CLK_MSSPLL instances CLK_MSSPLL0? > +#define CLK_MSSPLL1 35 > +#define CLK_MSSPLL2 36 > +#define CLK_MSSPLL3 37 > +/* 38 is reserved for MSS PLL internals */ > > /* Clock Conditioning Circuitry Clock IDs */ > > -- > 2.39.2 > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-riscv mailing list > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 09:40:00AM -0800, Emil Renner Berthing wrote: > Conor Dooley wrote: > > From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > > > > There are 3 undocumented outputs of the MSSPLL that are used for the CAN > > bus, "user crypto" module and eMMC. Add their clock IDs so that they can > > be hooked up in DT. > > > > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > > --- > > include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h | 5 +++++ > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h > > index 79775a5134ca..b52f19a2b480 100644 > > --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h > > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h > > @@ -44,6 +44,11 @@ > > > > #define CLK_RTCREF 33 > > #define CLK_MSSPLL 34 > > +#define CLK_MSSPLL0 34 > > You add this new CLK_MSSPLL0 macro with the same value as CLK_MSSPLL, but > never seem to use it in this series. Did you mean to rename the CLK_MSSPLL > instances CLK_MSSPLL0? Yes, that was my intention.
On 08/12/2023 18:12, Conor Dooley wrote: > From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > > There are 3 undocumented outputs of the MSSPLL that are used for the CAN > bus, "user crypto" module and eMMC. Add their clock IDs so that they can > be hooked up in DT. > > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > --- Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Best regards, Krzysztof
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h index 79775a5134ca..b52f19a2b480 100644 --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h @@ -44,6 +44,11 @@ #define CLK_RTCREF 33 #define CLK_MSSPLL 34 +#define CLK_MSSPLL0 34 +#define CLK_MSSPLL1 35 +#define CLK_MSSPLL2 36 +#define CLK_MSSPLL3 37 +/* 38 is reserved for MSS PLL internals */ /* Clock Conditioning Circuitry Clock IDs */