Message ID | 20231212-ep93xx-v6-0-c307b8ac9aa8@maquefel.me (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | ep93xx device tree conversion | expand |
Hello, On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 11:20:17AM +0300, Nikita Shubin via B4 Relay wrote: > No major changes since last version all changes are cometic. > > Following patches require attention from Stephen Boyd, as they were converted to aux_dev as suggested: > > - ARM: ep93xx: add regmap aux_dev > - clk: ep93xx: add DT support for Cirrus EP93xx > > DMA related patches still require Acked or Reviewed tags. > > got approval LGTM from Miquel: > - mtd: rawnand: add support for ts72xx > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231004103911.2aa65354@xps-13/ > > new patches: > > ARM: ep93xx: Add terminator to gpiod_lookup_table > - fixed terminator in gpiod_lockup_table > > So mostly all patches got approval. > > Patches should be now formated with '--histogram' You didn't mention how this should be merged. IIRC for the earlier rounds the idea was to merge it all together via arm-soc when all necessary agreement is reached. I assume that's still the case here? Best regards Uwe
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 11:20:17AM +0300, Nikita Shubin wrote: > No major changes since last version all changes are cometic. > > Following patches require attention from Stephen Boyd, as they were converted to aux_dev as suggested: > > - ARM: ep93xx: add regmap aux_dev > - clk: ep93xx: add DT support for Cirrus EP93xx > > DMA related patches still require Acked or Reviewed tags. > > got approval LGTM from Miquel: > - mtd: rawnand: add support for ts72xx > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231004103911.2aa65354@xps-13/ > > new patches: > > ARM: ep93xx: Add terminator to gpiod_lookup_table > - fixed terminator in gpiod_lockup_table > > So mostly all patches got approval. > > Patches should be now formated with '--histogram' It _feels_ like some tags might be missing. In any case I suggest to use `b4` tool to retrieve tags when preparing the next version: git checkout -b vXX v6.7-rcX b4 am -slt $MSG_ID_OF_v(XX-1) git am ... git rebase --interactive ... # to address comments
Hello Andy! On Wed, 2023-12-13 at 19:59 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 11:20:17AM +0300, Nikita Shubin wrote: > > No major changes since last version all changes are cometic. > > > > Following patches require attention from Stephen Boyd, as they were > > converted to aux_dev as suggested: > > > > - ARM: ep93xx: add regmap aux_dev > > - clk: ep93xx: add DT support for Cirrus EP93xx > > > > DMA related patches still require Acked or Reviewed tags. > > > > got approval LGTM from Miquel: > > - mtd: rawnand: add support for ts72xx > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231004103911.2aa65354@xps-13/ > > > > new patches: > > > > ARM: ep93xx: Add terminator to gpiod_lookup_table > > - fixed terminator in gpiod_lockup_table > > > > So mostly all patches got approval. > > > > Patches should be now formated with '--histogram' > > It _feels_ like some tags might be missing. > In any case I suggest to use `b4` tool to retrieve tags when > preparing > the next version: > > git checkout -b vXX v6.7-rcX > b4 am -slt $MSG_ID_OF_v(XX-1) > git am ... > git rebase --interactive ... # to address comments > I moved to b4 a few iterations ago: ``` Calculating patch-ids from commits, this may take a moment... Checking change-id "20230605-ep93xx-01c76317e2d2" Grabbing search results from lore.kernel.org Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/all/20230424123522.18302-1- nikita.shubin%40maquefel.me/t.mbox.gz --- NOTE: some trailers ignored due to from/email mismatches: ! Trailer: Tested-by: Michael Peters <mpeters@embeddedTS.com> Msg From: Kris Bahnsen <kris@embeddedTS.com> NOTE: Rerun with -S to apply them anyway No trailer updates found. ``` I haven't found any missing tags, that b4 didn't apply, the ones above refer to a very old iteration and were given to cover letter and i don't feel like they need to be included.
On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 11:13 AM Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@maquefel.me> wrote: > On Wed, 2023-12-13 at 19:59 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: ... > I haven't found any missing tags, that b4 didn't apply, the ones above > refer to a very old iteration and were given to cover letter and i > don't feel like they need to be included. When somebody gives you a tag against a cover letter, it means the entire series (if not spelled differently). `b4` even has a parameter -t for that IIRC.