| Message ID | 20231216024834.3510073-3-kent.overstreet@linux.dev (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | big header dependency cleanup targeting sched.h | expand |
For the x86 patches [2-5/50], should the patch subject be a bit more generic rather than having the full file name listed. For example, this patch could be "x86/fpu: Fix missing include". On 12/16/2023 8:17 AM, Kent Overstreet wrote: > Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev> > --- > arch/x86/kernel/fpu/bugs.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 04:38:33PM +0530, Sohil Mehta wrote: > For the x86 patches [2-5/50], should the patch subject be a bit more > generic rather than having the full file name listed. > > For example, this patch could be "x86/fpu: Fix missing include". In the latest version of the patchset I've just rolled all of the arch/x86 missing includes into one patch.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/bugs.c index 794e70151203..a06b876bbf2d 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/bugs.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/bugs.c @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ /* * x86 FPU bug checks: */ +#include <asm/cpufeature.h> #include <asm/fpu/api.h> /*
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev> --- arch/x86/kernel/fpu/bugs.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)