| Message ID | 20231221090046.1486195-2-tudor.ambarus@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [1/2] dt-bindings: clock: gs101: rename cmu_misc clock-names | expand |
Hi Tudor, > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/google/gs101.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/google/gs101.dtsi > index 9747cb3fa03a..d838e3a7af6e 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/google/gs101.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/google/gs101.dtsi > @@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ cmu_misc: clock-controller@10010000 { > #clock-cells = <1>; > clocks = <&cmu_top CLK_DOUT_CMU_MISC_BUS>, > <&cmu_top CLK_DOUT_CMU_MISC_SSS>; > - clock-names = "dout_cmu_misc_bus", "dout_cmu_misc_sss"; > + clock-names = "bus", "sss"; > }; > With this change, parent clock enablement fails, and we get: exynos_arm64_register_cmu: could not enable bus clock dout_cmu_misc_bus; err = -2 during boot. Cheers, Andre'
On 12/21/23 09:00, Tudor Ambarus wrote: > The cmu_misc clock-names were renamed to just "bus" and "sss" because > naming is local to the module, so cmu_misc is implied. As the bindings > and the device tree have not made a release yet, comply with the > renamed clocks. > > Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org> > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/google/gs101.dtsi | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/google/gs101.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/google/gs101.dtsi > index 9747cb3fa03a..d838e3a7af6e 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/google/gs101.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/google/gs101.dtsi > @@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ cmu_misc: clock-controller@10010000 { > #clock-cells = <1>; > clocks = <&cmu_top CLK_DOUT_CMU_MISC_BUS>, > <&cmu_top CLK_DOUT_CMU_MISC_SSS>; > - clock-names = "dout_cmu_misc_bus", "dout_cmu_misc_sss"; > + clock-names = "bus", "sss"; > }; > > watchdog_cl0: watchdog@10060000 { argh, please ignore the patch set. It seems that the clock driver has to be updated as well: [ 0.050947] exynos_arm64_register_cmu: could not enable bus clock dout_cmu_misc_bus; err = -2 [ 0.052385] exynos_arm64_register_cmu: could not enable bus clock dout_cmu_peric0_bus; err = -2
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/google/gs101.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/google/gs101.dtsi index 9747cb3fa03a..d838e3a7af6e 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/google/gs101.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/google/gs101.dtsi @@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ cmu_misc: clock-controller@10010000 { #clock-cells = <1>; clocks = <&cmu_top CLK_DOUT_CMU_MISC_BUS>, <&cmu_top CLK_DOUT_CMU_MISC_SSS>; - clock-names = "dout_cmu_misc_bus", "dout_cmu_misc_sss"; + clock-names = "bus", "sss"; }; watchdog_cl0: watchdog@10060000 {
The cmu_misc clock-names were renamed to just "bus" and "sss" because naming is local to the module, so cmu_misc is implied. As the bindings and the device tree have not made a release yet, comply with the renamed clocks. Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org> --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/google/gs101.dtsi | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)