Message ID | 20240103185716.1790546-7-me@deliversmonkey.space (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Pointer Masking update for Zjpm v0.8 | expand |
On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 4:58 AM Alexey Baturo <baturo.alexey@gmail.com> wrote: > > From: Alexey Baturo <baturo.alexey@gmail.com> > > Signed-off-by: Alexey Baturo <baturo.alexey@gmail.com> > --- > target/riscv/cpu.c | 8 ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c > index 1e6571ce99..13389ddc55 100644 > --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c > @@ -153,6 +153,9 @@ const RISCVIsaExtData isa_edata_arr[] = { > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svinval, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svinval), > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svnapot, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svnapot), > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svpbmt, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svpbmt), > + ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(ssnpm, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_ssnpm), > + ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(smnpm, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_smnpm), > + ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(smmpm, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_smmpm), > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xtheadba, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0, ext_xtheadba), > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xtheadbb, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0, ext_xtheadbb), > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xtheadbs, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0, ext_xtheadbs), > @@ -1337,6 +1340,11 @@ const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_extensions[] = { > > MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zmmul", ext_zmmul, false), > > + /* Zjpm v0.8 extensions */ > + MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("ssnpm", ext_ssnpm, false), > + MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("smnpm", ext_smnpm, false), > + MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("smmpm", ext_smmpm, false), What happens to the existing J property? Alistair > + > MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zca", ext_zca, false), > MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zcb", ext_zcb, false), > MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zcd", ext_zcd, false), > -- > 2.34.1 > >
I might be wrong here, but right now J in MISA is unused. I think the J-letter extension is still a thing, but current extensions like Zjpm and Zjid follow the Z ext scheme. Do you think it should be removed? пт, 5 янв. 2024 г. в 08:28, Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com>: > On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 4:58 AM Alexey Baturo <baturo.alexey@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > From: Alexey Baturo <baturo.alexey@gmail.com> > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexey Baturo <baturo.alexey@gmail.com> > > --- > > target/riscv/cpu.c | 8 ++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c > > index 1e6571ce99..13389ddc55 100644 > > --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c > > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c > > @@ -153,6 +153,9 @@ const RISCVIsaExtData isa_edata_arr[] = { > > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svinval, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svinval), > > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svnapot, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svnapot), > > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svpbmt, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svpbmt), > > + ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(ssnpm, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_ssnpm), > > + ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(smnpm, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_smnpm), > > + ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(smmpm, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_smmpm), > > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xtheadba, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0, ext_xtheadba), > > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xtheadbb, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0, ext_xtheadbb), > > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xtheadbs, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0, ext_xtheadbs), > > @@ -1337,6 +1340,11 @@ const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig > riscv_cpu_extensions[] = { > > > > MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zmmul", ext_zmmul, false), > > > > + /* Zjpm v0.8 extensions */ > > + MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("ssnpm", ext_ssnpm, false), > > + MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("smnpm", ext_smnpm, false), > > + MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("smmpm", ext_smmpm, false), > > What happens to the existing J property? > > > Alistair > > > + > > MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zca", ext_zca, false), > > MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zcb", ext_zcb, false), > > MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zcd", ext_zcd, false), > > -- > > 2.34.1 > > > > >
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 5:23 PM Alexey Baturo <baturo.alexey@gmail.com> wrote: > > I might be wrong here, but right now J in MISA is unused. I suspect you are right, it would be worth confirming though. > I think the J-letter extension is still a thing, but current extensions like Zjpm and Zjid follow the Z ext scheme. > Do you think it should be removed? It sounds like it should be removed then Alistair > > > пт, 5 янв. 2024 г. в 08:28, Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com>: >> >> On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 4:58 AM Alexey Baturo <baturo.alexey@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > From: Alexey Baturo <baturo.alexey@gmail.com> >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Alexey Baturo <baturo.alexey@gmail.com> >> > --- >> > target/riscv/cpu.c | 8 ++++++++ >> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) >> > >> > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c >> > index 1e6571ce99..13389ddc55 100644 >> > --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c >> > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c >> > @@ -153,6 +153,9 @@ const RISCVIsaExtData isa_edata_arr[] = { >> > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svinval, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svinval), >> > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svnapot, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svnapot), >> > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svpbmt, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svpbmt), >> > + ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(ssnpm, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_ssnpm), >> > + ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(smnpm, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_smnpm), >> > + ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(smmpm, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_smmpm), >> > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xtheadba, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0, ext_xtheadba), >> > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xtheadbb, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0, ext_xtheadbb), >> > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xtheadbs, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0, ext_xtheadbs), >> > @@ -1337,6 +1340,11 @@ const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_extensions[] = { >> > >> > MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zmmul", ext_zmmul, false), >> > >> > + /* Zjpm v0.8 extensions */ >> > + MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("ssnpm", ext_ssnpm, false), >> > + MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("smnpm", ext_smnpm, false), >> > + MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("smmpm", ext_smmpm, false), >> >> What happens to the existing J property? >> >> >> Alistair >> >> > + >> > MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zca", ext_zca, false), >> > MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zcb", ext_zcb, false), >> > MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zcd", ext_zcd, false), >> > -- >> > 2.34.1 >> > >> >
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c index 1e6571ce99..13389ddc55 100644 --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c @@ -153,6 +153,9 @@ const RISCVIsaExtData isa_edata_arr[] = { ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svinval, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svinval), ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svnapot, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svnapot), ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svpbmt, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svpbmt), + ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(ssnpm, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_ssnpm), + ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(smnpm, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_smnpm), + ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(smmpm, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_smmpm), ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xtheadba, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0, ext_xtheadba), ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xtheadbb, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0, ext_xtheadbb), ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xtheadbs, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0, ext_xtheadbs), @@ -1337,6 +1340,11 @@ const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_extensions[] = { MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zmmul", ext_zmmul, false), + /* Zjpm v0.8 extensions */ + MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("ssnpm", ext_ssnpm, false), + MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("smnpm", ext_smnpm, false), + MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("smmpm", ext_smmpm, false), + MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zca", ext_zca, false), MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zcb", ext_zcb, false), MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zcd", ext_zcd, false),