| Message ID | 562a6f99-3f8e-9a77-e519-b668e24dced2@web.de (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | ARM: Adjustments for init_atags_procfs() | expand |
> Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 19:06:32 +0200 > > A few update suggestions were taken into account > from static source code analysis. > > Markus Elfring (2): > Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation > Return directly after a failed kmalloc() > > arch/arm/kernel/atags_proc.c | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) Is this patch series still in review queues? See also: https://lore.kernel.org/cocci/2258ce64-2a14-6778-8319-b342b06a1f33@web.de/ https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/cocci/2023-04/msg00034.html Regards, Markus
> Is this patch series still in review queues?
See also:
https://lore.kernel.org/cocci/562a6f99-3f8e-9a77-e519-b668e24dced2@web.de/
https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/cocci/2023-03/msg00098.html
Regards,
Markus
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 12:52:10PM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote: > > Is this patch series still in review queues? > > See also: > https://lore.kernel.org/cocci/562a6f99-3f8e-9a77-e519-b668e24dced2@web.de/ > https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/cocci/2023-03/msg00098.html I suspect no one looked at it, sorry. I don't catch everything that is on the mailing list. Looks fine to me but it needs to end up in the patch system to be applied. See signature below.
>>> Is this patch series still in review queues? >> >> See also: >> https://lore.kernel.org/cocci/562a6f99-3f8e-9a77-e519-b668e24dced2@web.de/ >> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/cocci/2023-03/msg00098.html > > I suspect no one looked at it, sorry. Special mailing list settings probably influenced this situation. > I don't catch everything that is > on the mailing list. Looks fine to me but it needs to end up in the > patch system to be applied. Can you collaborate also with mentioned mailing list archive interfaces? Regards, Markus
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 01:44:01PM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote: > >>> Is this patch series still in review queues? > >> > >> See also: > >> https://lore.kernel.org/cocci/562a6f99-3f8e-9a77-e519-b668e24dced2@web.de/ > >> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/cocci/2023-03/msg00098.html > > > > I suspect no one looked at it, sorry. > > Special mailing list settings probably influenced this situation. > > > I don't catch everything that is > > on the mailing list. Looks fine to me but it needs to end up in the > > patch system to be applied. > > Can you collaborate also with mentioned mailing list archive interfaces? Err what? Sorry, I don't understand your comment.
>>>>> Is this patch series still in review queues? >>>> >>>> See also: >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/cocci/562a6f99-3f8e-9a77-e519-b668e24dced2@web.de/ >>>> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/cocci/2023-03/msg00098.html >>> >>> I suspect no one looked at it, sorry. >> >> Special mailing list settings probably influenced this situation. Did any communication filters hinder the clarification of further development ideas? >>> I don't catch everything that is >>> on the mailing list. Looks fine to me but it needs to end up in the >>> patch system to be applied. >> >> Can you collaborate also with mentioned mailing list archive interfaces? > > Err what? Sorry, I don't understand your comment. Are you going to pick any patches up from linked information sources? Regards, Markus
On 24/01/10 12:47PM, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 01:44:01PM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote: > > >>> Is this patch series still in review queues? > > >> > > >> See also: > > >> https://lore.kernel.org/cocci/562a6f99-3f8e-9a77-e519-b668e24dced2@web.de/ > > >> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/cocci/2023-03/msg00098.html > > > > > > I suspect no one looked at it, sorry. > > > > Special mailing list settings probably influenced this situation. > > > > > I don't catch everything that is > > > on the mailing list. Looks fine to me but it needs to end up in the > > > patch system to be applied. > > > > Can you collaborate also with mentioned mailing list archive interfaces? > > Err what? Sorry, I don't understand your comment. I am just generally following along here, but to give some context it seems like Markus is banned from posting to various kernel mailing lists[0][1][2]. Cheers, Chris [0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2023/6/19/38 [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHC9VhREfdgiCji=uEeCrc4w1kPGfnWGKnJuUYKXwTApdneSjQ@mail.gmail.com/T/#m1a55ecc3205045fe63ab0f12451705df911d31a0 [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20200629081039.GA1221843@kroah.com/
> I am just generally following along here, but to give some context it > seems like Markus is banned from posting to various kernel mailing > lists[0][1][2]. This was the case for a while. Were such communication filters reconsidered anyhow recently? Regards, Markus
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 01:52:34PM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote: > >>>>> Is this patch series still in review queues? > >>>> > >>>> See also: > >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/cocci/562a6f99-3f8e-9a77-e519-b668e24dced2@web.de/ > >>>> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/cocci/2023-03/msg00098.html > >>> > >>> I suspect no one looked at it, sorry. > >> > >> Special mailing list settings probably influenced this situation. > > Did any communication filters hinder the clarification of further development ideas? How about doing the research yourself? Using lore, it's possible to work it out. Find the message id. Then visit https://lore.kernel.org/r/<message-id> and study the result. It will give you the answer you want. > >>> I don't catch everything that is > >>> on the mailing list. Looks fine to me but it needs to end up in the > >>> patch system to be applied. > >> > >> Can you collaborate also with mentioned mailing list archive interfaces? > > > > Err what? Sorry, I don't understand your comment. > > Are you going to pick any patches up from linked information sources? No. Did you read my first reply which told you how patches get applied to arch/arm? If you didn't, your patch won't get applied.
>> Are you going to pick any patches up from linked information sources? > > No. Did you read my first reply which told you how patches get applied > to arch/arm? If you didn't, your patch won't get applied. Do you request a resend of affected patches here? Regards, Markus
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 03:00:11PM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote: > >> Are you going to pick any patches up from linked information sources? > > > > No. Did you read my first reply which told you how patches get applied > > to arch/arm? If you didn't, your patch won't get applied. > > Do you request a resend of affected patches here? Welcome to my /dev/null mailbox. It has plenty of space. Feel free to continue sending your claptrap there. Rest assured I won't read it anymore.