Message ID | 20240109181104.1670304-1-andri@yngvason.is (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | New DRM properties for output color format | expand |
mið., 10. jan. 2024 kl. 11:10 skrifaði Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>: > > On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 06:11:00PM +0000, Andri Yngvason wrote: > > + /* Extract information from crtc to communicate it to userspace as connector properties */ > > + for_each_new_connector_in_state(state, connector, new_con_state, i) { > > + struct drm_crtc *crtc = new_con_state->crtc; > > + struct dc_stream_state *stream; > > + > > + if (crtc) { > > + new_crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc); > > + dm_new_crtc_state = to_dm_crtc_state(new_crtc_state); > > + stream = dm_new_crtc_state->stream; > > + > > + if (stream) { > > + drm_connector_set_active_color_format_property(connector, > > + convert_dc_pixel_encoding_into_drm_color_format( > > + dm_new_crtc_state->stream->timing.pixel_encoding)); > > + } > > + } else { > > + drm_connector_set_active_color_format_property(connector, 0); > > Just realized an even bigger reason why your current design doesn't work: > You don't have locking here. > > And you cannot grab the required lock, which is > drm_dev->mode_config.mutex, because that would result in deadlocks. So > this really needs to use the atomic state based design I've described. > Maybe we should just drop "actual color format" and instead fail the modeset if the "preferred color format" property cannot be satisfied? It seems like the simplest thing to do here, though it is perhaps less convenient for userspace. In that case, the "preferred color format" property should just be called "color format". Thanks, Andri
Hi Werner, mið., 10. jan. 2024 kl. 13:14 skrifaði Werner Sembach <wse@tuxedocomputers.com>: > > Hi, > > Am 10.01.24 um 14:09 schrieb Daniel Vetter: > > On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 at 13:53, Andri Yngvason <andri@yngvason.is> wrote: > >> mið., 10. jan. 2024 kl. 11:10 skrifaði Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>: > >>> On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 06:11:00PM +0000, Andri Yngvason wrote: > >>>> + /* Extract information from crtc to communicate it to userspace as connector properties */ > >>>> + for_each_new_connector_in_state(state, connector, new_con_state, i) { > >>>> + struct drm_crtc *crtc = new_con_state->crtc; > >>>> + struct dc_stream_state *stream; > >>>> + > >>>> + if (crtc) { > >>>> + new_crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc); > >>>> + dm_new_crtc_state = to_dm_crtc_state(new_crtc_state); > >>>> + stream = dm_new_crtc_state->stream; > >>>> + > >>>> + if (stream) { > >>>> + drm_connector_set_active_color_format_property(connector, > >>>> + convert_dc_pixel_encoding_into_drm_color_format( > >>>> + dm_new_crtc_state->stream->timing.pixel_encoding)); > >>>> + } > >>>> + } else { > >>>> + drm_connector_set_active_color_format_property(connector, 0); > >>> Just realized an even bigger reason why your current design doesn't work: > >>> You don't have locking here. > >>> > >>> And you cannot grab the required lock, which is > >>> drm_dev->mode_config.mutex, because that would result in deadlocks. So > >>> this really needs to use the atomic state based design I've described. > >>> > >> Maybe we should just drop "actual color format" and instead fail the > >> modeset if the "preferred color format" property cannot be satisfied? > >> It seems like the simplest thing to do here, though it is perhaps less > >> convenient for userspace. In that case, the "preferred color format" > >> property should just be called "color format". > > Yeah that's more in line with how other atomic properties work. This > > way userspace can figure out what works with a TEST_ONLY commit too. > > And for this to work you probably want to have an "automatic" setting > > too. > > -Sima > > The problem with TEST_ONLY probing is that color format settings are > interdependent: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/476#note_966634 > > So changing any other setting may require every color format to be TEST_ONLY > probed again. > If we put a bit map containing the possible color formats into drm_mode_mode_info (I'm thinking that it could go into flags), we'd be able to eliminate a bunch of combinations early on. Do you think that would make things more bearable? I'm thinking, something like this: diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/drm_mode.h b/include/uapi/drm/drm_mode.h index 128d09138ceb3..59980803cb89e 100644 --- a/include/uapi/drm/drm_mode.h +++ b/include/uapi/drm/drm_mode.h @@ -124,6 +124,13 @@ extern "C" { #define DRM_MODE_FLAG_PIC_AR_256_135 \ (DRM_MODE_PICTURE_ASPECT_256_135<<19) +/* Possible color formats (4 bits) */ +#define DRM_MODE_FLAG_COLOR_FORMAT_MASK (0x0f << 22) +#define DRM_MODE_FLAG_COLOR_FORMAT_RGB (1 << 22) +#define DRM_MODE_FLAG_COLOR_FORMAT_YCBCR444 (1 << 23) +#define DRM_MODE_FLAG_COLOR_FORMAT_YCBCR422 (1 << 24) +#define DRM_MODE_FLAG_COLOR_FORMAT_YCBCR420 (1 << 25) + #define DRM_MODE_FLAG_ALL (DRM_MODE_FLAG_PHSYNC | \ DRM_MODE_FLAG_NHSYNC | \ DRM_MODE_FLAG_PVSYNC | \ @@ -136,7 +143,8 @@ extern "C" { DRM_MODE_FLAG_HSKEW | \ DRM_MODE_FLAG_DBLCLK | \ DRM_MODE_FLAG_CLKDIV2 | \ - DRM_MODE_FLAG_3D_MASK) + DRM_MODE_FLAG_3D_MASK | \ + DRM_MODE_FLAG_COLOR_FORMAT_MASK) /* DPMS flags */ /* bit compatible with the xorg definitions. */