Message ID | 20240126171546.1233172-13-tudor.ambarus@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | spi: s3c64xx: straightforward cleanup | expand |
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 11:16 AM Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org> wrote: > > ETIMEDOUT is more specific than EIO, use it for > wait_for_completion_timeout(). > > Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org> > --- Looks like you missed my R-b tag I added to this patch in your previous submission. > drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c > index 76fa378ab5ab..2f2c4ad35df4 100644 > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c > @@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ static int s3c64xx_wait_for_dma(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd, > > /* > * If the previous xfer was completed within timeout, then > - * proceed further else return -EIO. > + * proceed further else return -ETIMEDOUT. > * DmaTx returns after simply writing data in the FIFO, > * w/o waiting for real transmission on the bus to finish. > * DmaRx returns only after Dma read data from FIFO which > @@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ static int s3c64xx_wait_for_dma(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd, > > /* If timed out while checking rx/tx status return error */ > if (!val) > - return -EIO; > + return -ETIMEDOUT; > > return 0; > } > @@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ static int s3c64xx_wait_for_pio(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd, > if (use_irq) { > val = msecs_to_jiffies(ms); > if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&sdd->xfer_completion, val)) > - return -EIO; > + return -ETIMEDOUT; > } > > val = msecs_to_loops(ms); > -- > 2.43.0.429.g432eaa2c6b-goog >
On 1/26/24 20:13, Sam Protsenko wrote: >> ETIMEDOUT is more specific than EIO, use it for >> wait_for_completion_timeout(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org> >> --- > Looks like you missed my R-b tag I added to this patch in your > previous submission. My apologies. Adding it here should do the trick, here it is: Reviewed-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c index 76fa378ab5ab..2f2c4ad35df4 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c @@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ static int s3c64xx_wait_for_dma(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd, /* * If the previous xfer was completed within timeout, then - * proceed further else return -EIO. + * proceed further else return -ETIMEDOUT. * DmaTx returns after simply writing data in the FIFO, * w/o waiting for real transmission on the bus to finish. * DmaRx returns only after Dma read data from FIFO which @@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ static int s3c64xx_wait_for_dma(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd, /* If timed out while checking rx/tx status return error */ if (!val) - return -EIO; + return -ETIMEDOUT; return 0; } @@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ static int s3c64xx_wait_for_pio(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd, if (use_irq) { val = msecs_to_jiffies(ms); if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&sdd->xfer_completion, val)) - return -EIO; + return -ETIMEDOUT; } val = msecs_to_loops(ms);
ETIMEDOUT is more specific than EIO, use it for wait_for_completion_timeout(). Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org> --- drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)