| Message ID | 20240131102150.728960-1-leitao@debian.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | net: dqs: NIC stall detector | expand |
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 02:21:48 -0800 Breno Leitao wrote: > Breno Leitao (1): > net: sysfs: Fix /sys/class/net/<iface> path Let me take this on in, but the other one is not a fix, so it has to go to net-next.
Hello: This series was applied to netdev/net.git (main) by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>: On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 02:21:48 -0800 you wrote: > This is a patch that was sent by Jakub Kicinski six month ago, and I > am reviving it. > > This is still mostly Jakub's code, with some small improvements, > described in the changelog. > > Changelog: > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [net,v2,1/2] net: sysfs: Fix /sys/class/net/<iface> path https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/ae3f4b44641d - [net,v2,2/2] net: dqs: add NIC stall detector based on BQL (no matching commit) You are awesome, thank you!
On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 08:14:32AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 02:21:48 -0800 Breno Leitao wrote: > > Breno Leitao (1): > > net: sysfs: Fix /sys/class/net/<iface> path > > Let me take this on in, but the other one is not a fix, > so it has to go to net-next. Sure. I didn't know how to split the dependencies. Maybe I should have sent both of them to net-next, and you would cherry-pick the fix to net? Is this a better approach for next time?
On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 10:47:40 -0800 Breno Leitao wrote: > > Let me take this on in, but the other one is not a fix, > > so it has to go to net-next. > > Sure. I didn't know how to split the dependencies. Maybe I should have > sent both of them to net-next, and you would cherry-pick the fix to net? > Is this a better approach for next time? You gotta send the net part and then wait until Thu afternoon Pacific time when Linus pulls from us. We then pull net (and Linus's tree into net-next).
On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 11:43:18AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 10:47:40 -0800 Breno Leitao wrote: > > > Let me take this on in, but the other one is not a fix, > > > so it has to go to net-next. > > > > Sure. I didn't know how to split the dependencies. Maybe I should have > > sent both of them to net-next, and you would cherry-pick the fix to net? > > Is this a better approach for next time? > > You gotta send the net part and then wait until Thu afternoon Pacific > time when Linus pulls from us. We then pull net (and Linus's tree into > net-next). Thanks for the clarification. I will wait for that before sending the second patch against net-next.
This is a patch that was sent by Jakub Kicinski six month ago, and I am reviving it. This is still mostly Jakub's code, with some small improvements, described in the changelog. Changelog: ---------- v1: * https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/202306172057.jx7YhLiu-lkp@intel.com/T/ v2: * Fix the documentation file in patch 0001, since patch 0002 will touch it later. * Fix the kernel test robot issues, marking functions as statics. * Use #include <linux/bitops.h> instead of <asm/bitops.h>. * Added some new comments around, mainly around barriers. * Format struct `netdev_queue_attribute` assignments to make checkpatch happy. * Updated and fixed the path in sysfs-class-net-queues documentation. Breno Leitao (1): net: sysfs: Fix /sys/class/net/<iface> path Jakub Kicinski (1): net: dqs: add NIC stall detector based on BQL .../ABI/testing/sysfs-class-net-queues | 45 ++++++++++---- include/linux/dynamic_queue_limits.h | 35 +++++++++++ include/trace/events/napi.h | 33 ++++++++++ lib/dynamic_queue_limits.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++ net/core/net-sysfs.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 222 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)