Message ID | 20240201122216.2634007-1-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | ice: add PFCP filter support | expand |
From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 13:21:55 +0100 > Add support for creating PFCP filters in switchdev mode. Add pfcp module > that allows to create a PFCP-type netdev. The netdev then can be passed to > tc when creating a filter to indicate that PFCP filter should be created. I believe folks agreed that bitmap_{read,write}() should stay inline, ping then? [...] Thanks, Olek
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 13:46:44 +0100 Alexander Lobakin wrote: > > Add support for creating PFCP filters in switchdev mode. Add pfcp module > > that allows to create a PFCP-type netdev. The netdev then can be passed to > > tc when creating a filter to indicate that PFCP filter should be created. > > I believe folks agreed that bitmap_{read,write}() should stay inline, > ping then? It's probably fine, IMHO. I mean, I think we agree that the rarely used inlines should not sit in a header included by half of the kernel (not an exaggeration). But IMHO a better fix would be to move out whatever cpumask.h xarray.h and other common headers depend on to a cut-down version rather than making your helpers not inline. So I think all we need for now is for people to ack the respective patches? Looks like cio and ntfs and missing acks, so are some of the bitops core patches.
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 13:46:44 +0100 Alexander Lobakin wrote: > > Add support for creating PFCP filters in switchdev mode. Add pfcp module > > that allows to create a PFCP-type netdev. The netdev then can be passed to > > tc when creating a filter to indicate that PFCP filter should be created. > > I believe folks agreed that bitmap_{read,write}() should stay inline, > ping then? Well, Dave dropped this from PW, again. Can you ping people to give you the acks and repost? What's your plan?
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 07:05:35 -0800 > On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 13:46:44 +0100 Alexander Lobakin wrote: >>> Add support for creating PFCP filters in switchdev mode. Add pfcp module >>> that allows to create a PFCP-type netdev. The netdev then can be passed to >>> tc when creating a filter to indicate that PFCP filter should be created. >> >> I believe folks agreed that bitmap_{read,write}() should stay inline, >> ping then? > > Well, Dave dropped this from PW, again. Can you ping people to give you Why was it dropped? :D > the acks and repost? What's your plan? Ufff, I thought people read their emails... Yury, Konstantin, s390 folks? Could you please give some missing acks? I don't want to ping everyone privately :z Thanks, Olek
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 12:35:38PM +0100, Alexander Lobakin wrote: > From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> > Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 07:05:35 -0800 > > > On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 13:46:44 +0100 Alexander Lobakin wrote: > >>> Add support for creating PFCP filters in switchdev mode. Add pfcp module > >>> that allows to create a PFCP-type netdev. The netdev then can be passed to > >>> tc when creating a filter to indicate that PFCP filter should be created. > >> > >> I believe folks agreed that bitmap_{read,write}() should stay inline, > >> ping then? > > > > Well, Dave dropped this from PW, again. Can you ping people to give you > > Why was it dropped? :D > > > the acks and repost? What's your plan? > > Ufff, I thought people read their emails... > > Yury, Konstantin, s390 folks? Could you please give some missing acks? I > don't want to ping everyone privately :z Hi Alexander, Jakub, I reviewed the series again and added my SOBs for bitmap-related patches, and Acks or RBs for the rest, where appropriate. Regarding the patch #17, I don't think that network-related tests should be hosted in lib/test-bitmap. This is not a critical issue, but Alexander, can you find a better place for the code? The rest of the series is OK for me. I think Jakub wants to pull this as a whole in his -net branch? If so please go ahead, if not - I can pull bitmap-related part in bitmap-for-next. Thanks, Yury
On Mon, 2024-02-12 at 12:35 +0100, Alexander Lobakin wrote: > From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> > Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 07:05:35 -0800 > > > On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 13:46:44 +0100 Alexander Lobakin wrote: > > > > Add support for creating PFCP filters in switchdev mode. Add pfcp module > > > > that allows to create a PFCP-type netdev. The netdev then can be passed to > > > > tc when creating a filter to indicate that PFCP filter should be created. > > > > > > I believe folks agreed that bitmap_{read,write}() should stay inline, > > > ping then? > > > > Well, Dave dropped this from PW, again. Can you ping people to give you > > Why was it dropped? :D > > > the acks and repost? What's your plan? > > Ufff, I thought people read their emails... > > Yury, Konstantin, s390 folks? Could you please give some missing acks? I > don't want to ping everyone privately :z > > Thanks, > Olek > I do see an Acked-by from Peter Oberparleiter for the s390/cio bit, so as far as I can tell the s390 part has all Acks necessary, no? Thanks, Niklas
From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 12:59:19 +0200 > On Mon, 2024-02-12 at 12:35 +0100, Alexander Lobakin wrote: >> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> >> Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 07:05:35 -0800 >> >>> On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 13:46:44 +0100 Alexander Lobakin wrote: >>>>> Add support for creating PFCP filters in switchdev mode. Add pfcp module >>>>> that allows to create a PFCP-type netdev. The netdev then can be passed to >>>>> tc when creating a filter to indicate that PFCP filter should be created. >>>> >>>> I believe folks agreed that bitmap_{read,write}() should stay inline, >>>> ping then? >>> >>> Well, Dave dropped this from PW, again. Can you ping people to give you >> >> Why was it dropped? :D >> >>> the acks and repost? What's your plan? >> >> Ufff, I thought people read their emails... >> >> Yury, Konstantin, s390 folks? Could you please give some missing acks? I >> don't want to ping everyone privately :z >> >> Thanks, >> Olek >> > > I do see an Acked-by from Peter Oberparleiter for the s390/cio bit, so > as far as I can tell the s390 part has all Acks necessary, no? The series was already taken to net-next :D > > Thanks, > Niklas Thanks, Olek