| Message ID | 20240221092728.1281499-6-davidgow@google.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable |
| Headers | show |
| Series | kunit: Fix printf format specifier issues in KUnit assertions | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| netdev/tree_selection | success | Guessing tree name failed - patch did not apply |
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 05:27:18PM +0800, David Gow wrote: > 'days' is a s64 (from div_s64), and so should use a %lld specifier. > > This was found by extending KUnit's assertion macros to use gcc's > __printf attribute. > > Fixes: 1d1bb12a8b18 ("rtc: Improve performance of rtc_time64_to_tm(). Add tests.") > Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> > --- > drivers/rtc/lib_test.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c b/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c > index d5caf36c56cd..225c859d6da5 100644 > --- a/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c > +++ b/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c > @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static void rtc_time64_to_tm_test_date_range(struct kunit *test) > > days = div_s64(secs, 86400); > > - #define FAIL_MSG "%d/%02d/%02d (%2d) : %ld", \ > + #define FAIL_MSG "%d/%02d/%02d (%2d) : %lld", \ > year, month, mday, yday, days > > KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, year - 1900, result.tm_year, FAIL_MSG); > -- > 2.44.0.rc0.258.g7320e95886-goog >
Hi, On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 05:27:18PM +0800, David Gow wrote: > 'days' is a s64 (from div_s64), and so should use a %lld specifier. > > This was found by extending KUnit's assertion macros to use gcc's > __printf attribute. > > Fixes: 1d1bb12a8b18 ("rtc: Improve performance of rtc_time64_to_tm(). Add tests.") > Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> > --- > drivers/rtc/lib_test.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c b/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c > index d5caf36c56cd..225c859d6da5 100644 > --- a/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c > +++ b/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c > @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static void rtc_time64_to_tm_test_date_range(struct kunit *test) > > days = div_s64(secs, 86400); > > - #define FAIL_MSG "%d/%02d/%02d (%2d) : %ld", \ > + #define FAIL_MSG "%d/%02d/%02d (%2d) : %lld", \ > year, month, mday, yday, days > > KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, year - 1900, result.tm_year, FAIL_MSG); > -- > 2.44.0.rc0.258.g7320e95886-goog > Thanks Justin
Hello, On 21/02/2024 17:27:18+0800, David Gow wrote: > 'days' is a s64 (from div_s64), and so should use a %lld specifier. > > This was found by extending KUnit's assertion macros to use gcc's > __printf attribute. > > Fixes: 1d1bb12a8b18 ("rtc: Improve performance of rtc_time64_to_tm(). Add tests.") > Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Who do you expect to take this patch? > --- > drivers/rtc/lib_test.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c b/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c > index d5caf36c56cd..225c859d6da5 100644 > --- a/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c > +++ b/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c > @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static void rtc_time64_to_tm_test_date_range(struct kunit *test) > > days = div_s64(secs, 86400); > > - #define FAIL_MSG "%d/%02d/%02d (%2d) : %ld", \ > + #define FAIL_MSG "%d/%02d/%02d (%2d) : %lld", \ > year, month, mday, yday, days > > KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, year - 1900, result.tm_year, FAIL_MSG); > -- > 2.44.0.rc0.258.g7320e95886-goog > >
On 2/27/24 13:32, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > Hello, > > On 21/02/2024 17:27:18+0800, David Gow wrote: >> 'days' is a s64 (from div_s64), and so should use a %lld specifier. >> >> This was found by extending KUnit's assertion macros to use gcc's >> __printf attribute. >> >> Fixes: 1d1bb12a8b18 ("rtc: Improve performance of rtc_time64_to_tm(). Add tests.") >> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> > > Who do you expect to take this patch? > I am going to be applying this series to linux-kselftest kunit next in just a bit. Would you like to ack the pacth? thanks, -- Shuah
On 27/02/2024 14:23:29-0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 2/27/24 13:32, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On 21/02/2024 17:27:18+0800, David Gow wrote: > > > 'days' is a s64 (from div_s64), and so should use a %lld specifier. > > > > > > This was found by extending KUnit's assertion macros to use gcc's > > > __printf attribute. > > > > > > Fixes: 1d1bb12a8b18 ("rtc: Improve performance of rtc_time64_to_tm(). Add tests.") > > > Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> > > > > Who do you expect to take this patch? > > > > I am going to be applying this series to linux-kselftest kunit next > in just a bit. Would you like to ack the pacth? Sure, Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> > > thanks, > -- Shuah > >
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c b/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c index d5caf36c56cd..225c859d6da5 100644 --- a/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c +++ b/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static void rtc_time64_to_tm_test_date_range(struct kunit *test) days = div_s64(secs, 86400); - #define FAIL_MSG "%d/%02d/%02d (%2d) : %ld", \ + #define FAIL_MSG "%d/%02d/%02d (%2d) : %lld", \ year, month, mday, yday, days KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, year - 1900, result.tm_year, FAIL_MSG);
'days' is a s64 (from div_s64), and so should use a %lld specifier. This was found by extending KUnit's assertion macros to use gcc's __printf attribute. Fixes: 1d1bb12a8b18 ("rtc: Improve performance of rtc_time64_to_tm(). Add tests.") Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> --- drivers/rtc/lib_test.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)