Message ID | ZcF1El7fn5xkeoB1@slm.duckdns.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Awaiting Upstream |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | ieee802154: ca8210: Drop spurious WQ_UNBOUND from alloc_ordered_workqueue() call | expand |
Hi Tejun, tj@kernel.org wrote on Mon, 5 Feb 2024 13:53:54 -1000: > Workqueue is in the process of cleaning up the distinction between unbound > workqueues w/ @nr_active==1 and ordered workqueues. Explicit WQ_UNBOUND > isn't needed for alloc_ordered_workqueue() and will trigger a warning in the > future. Let's remove it. This doesn't cause any functional changes. > Looks okay to me. Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Thanks, Miquèl
Hello, On 06.02.24 00:53, Tejun Heo wrote: > Workqueue is in the process of cleaning up the distinction between unbound > workqueues w/ @nr_active==1 and ordered workqueues. Explicit WQ_UNBOUND > isn't needed for alloc_ordered_workqueue() and will trigger a warning in the > future. Let's remove it. This doesn't cause any functional changes. > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> > --- > drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c | 10 ++-------- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > --- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c > @@ -2857,19 +2857,13 @@ static int ca8210_interrupt_init(struct > */ > static int ca8210_dev_com_init(struct ca8210_priv *priv) > { > - priv->mlme_workqueue = alloc_ordered_workqueue( > - "MLME work queue", > - WQ_UNBOUND > - ); > + priv->mlme_workqueue = alloc_ordered_workqueue("MLME work queue", 0); > if (!priv->mlme_workqueue) { > dev_crit(&priv->spi->dev, "alloc of mlme_workqueue failed!\n"); > return -ENOMEM; > } > > - priv->irq_workqueue = alloc_ordered_workqueue( > - "ca8210 irq worker", > - WQ_UNBOUND > - ); > + priv->irq_workqueue = alloc_ordered_workqueue("ca8210 irq worker", 0); > if (!priv->irq_workqueue) { > dev_crit(&priv->spi->dev, "alloc of irq_workqueue failed!\n"); > destroy_workqueue(priv->mlme_workqueue); This patch has been applied to the wpan-next tree and will be part of the next pull request to net-next. Thanks! regards Stefan Schmidt
--- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c +++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c @@ -2857,19 +2857,13 @@ static int ca8210_interrupt_init(struct */ static int ca8210_dev_com_init(struct ca8210_priv *priv) { - priv->mlme_workqueue = alloc_ordered_workqueue( - "MLME work queue", - WQ_UNBOUND - ); + priv->mlme_workqueue = alloc_ordered_workqueue("MLME work queue", 0); if (!priv->mlme_workqueue) { dev_crit(&priv->spi->dev, "alloc of mlme_workqueue failed!\n"); return -ENOMEM; } - priv->irq_workqueue = alloc_ordered_workqueue( - "ca8210 irq worker", - WQ_UNBOUND - ); + priv->irq_workqueue = alloc_ordered_workqueue("ca8210 irq worker", 0); if (!priv->irq_workqueue) { dev_crit(&priv->spi->dev, "alloc of irq_workqueue failed!\n"); destroy_workqueue(priv->mlme_workqueue);
Workqueue is in the process of cleaning up the distinction between unbound workqueues w/ @nr_active==1 and ordered workqueues. Explicit WQ_UNBOUND isn't needed for alloc_ordered_workqueue() and will trigger a warning in the future. Let's remove it. This doesn't cause any functional changes. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> --- drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c | 10 ++-------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)