Message ID | pull.1663.v3.git.git.1708841439516.gitgitgadget@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | [v3] build: support z/OS (OS/390). | expand |
"Haritha via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes: > From: Haritha D <harithamma.d@ibm.com> > > Since the z/OS linker does not support searching dynamic libraries, > and the current setting of CC_LD_DYNPATH results in a directory > to be supplied to the link step with no option as the suffix, > it causes a linker error because the z/OS LD linker > does not accept directories as input. > Therefore, -L option is added. Shouldn't all of the above removed by now, with 07bbe4ca (Merge branch 'jc/make-libpath-template', 2024-02-06) that merged the support for platforms whose linker does not have a way to specify the path used at runtime to locate dynamic libraries and is already in the Git 2.44 release? The autoconf-generated config.mak.autogen would leave CC_LD_DYNPATH to empty on such a platform, which then adds only one "-L $where" (instead of the usual "-L $where -R $where") on the linker command line, making your earlier workaround to use "-L $where -L $where" unnecessary? > Also introduced z/OS (OS/390) as a platform in config.mak.uname "Introduce z/OS ..." (cf. Documentation/SubmittingPatches) Or perhaps Add platform specific settings in config.mak.uname for zOS (OS/390). > diff --git a/config.mak.uname b/config.mak.uname > index dacc95172dc..03ee2b74525 100644 > --- a/config.mak.uname > +++ b/config.mak.uname > @@ -638,6 +638,18 @@ ifeq ($(uname_S),NONSTOP_KERNEL) > SANE_TOOL_PATH = /usr/coreutils/bin:/usr/local/bin > SHELL_PATH = /usr/coreutils/bin/bash > endif > +ifeq ($(uname_S),OS/390) > + NO_SYS_POLL_H = YesPlease > + NO_STRCASESTR = YesPlease > + NO_REGEX = YesPlease > + NO_MMAP = YesPlease > + NO_NSEC = YesPlease > + NO_STRLCPY = YesPlease > + NO_MEMMEM = YesPlease > + NO_GECOS_IN_PWENT = YesPlease > + HAVE_STRINGS_H = YesPlease > + NEEDS_MODE_TRANSLATION = YesPlease All of the above should be indented with TAB to imitate the support for other platforms, I think. Thanks. > +endif > ifeq ($(uname_S),MINGW) > ifeq ($(shell expr "$(uname_R)" : '1\.'),2) > $(error "Building with MSys is no longer supported") > > base-commit: f41f85c9ec8d4d46de0fd5fded88db94d3ec8c11
Hi Team, The win test(7) test case failed stating the reason as "The Operation cancelled". I saw that it failed after 5 hours 59 minutes of running the test cases(build). How do I handle this? Please suggest. Best regards Haritha On 26/02/24, 11:15 PM, "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com <mailto:gitster@pobox.com>> wrote: "Haritha via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com <mailto:gitgitgadget@gmail.com>> writes: > From: Haritha D <harithamma.d@ibm.com <mailto:harithamma.d@ibm.com>> > > Since the z/OS linker does not support searching dynamic libraries, > and the current setting of CC_LD_DYNPATH results in a directory > to be supplied to the link step with no option as the suffix, > it causes a linker error because the z/OS LD linker > does not accept directories as input. > Therefore, -L option is added. Shouldn't all of the above removed by now, with 07bbe4ca (Merge branch 'jc/make-libpath-template', 2024-02-06) that merged the support for platforms whose linker does not have a way to specify the path used at runtime to locate dynamic libraries and is already in the Git 2.44 release? The autoconf-generated config.mak.autogen would leave CC_LD_DYNPATH to empty on such a platform, which then adds only one "-L $where" (instead of the usual "-L $where -R $where") on the linker command line, making your earlier workaround to use "-L $where -L $where" unnecessary? > Also introduced z/OS (OS/390) as a platform in config.mak.uname "Introduce z/OS ..." (cf. Documentation/SubmittingPatches) Or perhaps Add platform specific settings in config.mak.uname for zOS (OS/390). > diff --git a/config.mak.uname b/config.mak.uname > index dacc95172dc..03ee2b74525 100644 > --- a/config.mak.uname > +++ b/config.mak.uname > @@ -638,6 +638,18 @@ ifeq ($(uname_S),NONSTOP_KERNEL) > SANE_TOOL_PATH = /usr/coreutils/bin:/usr/local/bin > SHELL_PATH = /usr/coreutils/bin/bash > endif > +ifeq ($(uname_S),OS/390) > + NO_SYS_POLL_H = YesPlease > + NO_STRCASESTR = YesPlease > + NO_REGEX = YesPlease > + NO_MMAP = YesPlease > + NO_NSEC = YesPlease > + NO_STRLCPY = YesPlease > + NO_MEMMEM = YesPlease > + NO_GECOS_IN_PWENT = YesPlease > + HAVE_STRINGS_H = YesPlease > + NEEDS_MODE_TRANSLATION = YesPlease All of the above should be indented with TAB to imitate the support for other platforms, I think. Thanks. > +endif > ifeq ($(uname_S),MINGW) > ifeq ($(shell expr "$(uname_R)" : '1\.'),2) > $(error "Building with MSys is no longer supported") > > base-commit: f41f85c9ec8d4d46de0fd5fded88db94d3ec8c11
On Fri Mar 1, 2024 at 2:39 PM IST, Haritha D wrote: > Hi Team, > > The win test(7) test case failed stating the reason as "The Operation cancelled". I saw that it failed after 5 hours 59 minutes of running the test cases(build). How do I handle this? > > Please suggest. Hey, This seems to be a recurring issue, as this happens to me majority of the time. Seems as though the vm just sits idle after finishing tests as 360 minutes is the timeout for github acitons. Usually, rerunning the failed tests from the actions tab works for me. Thanks.
Haritha D <Harithamma.D@ibm.com> writes: > The win test(7) test case failed stating the reason as "The > Operation cancelled". I saw that it failed after 5 hours 59 > minutes of running the test cases(build). How do I handle this? Those "win test (n)", at least some of them, seem to have been somewhat flaky [*1*]. If you are certain you did not break them with your change, you do not have to fix them yourself. I am a wrong person to ask how the test failure that may [*2*] block GGG submission can be circumvented, as I am not involved in that machinery at all. Thanks. [Footnotes] *1* Also I've seen osx-clang job time-out from time to time, without failing any specific test. Re-running failed jobs from the menu often make them pass, which is why I said "somewhat flaky". *2* I do not even know if GGG refuses to submit a series with a test failure, let alone if it allows to override such a safety if exists.
On Friday, March 1, 2024 1:15 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >Haritha D <Harithamma.D@ibm.com> writes: > >> The win test(7) test case failed stating the reason as "The Operation >> cancelled". I saw that it failed after 5 hours 59 minutes of running >> the test cases(build). How do I handle this? > >Those "win test (n)", at least some of them, seem to have been somewhat flaky [*1*]. If you are certain you did not break them with >your change, you do not have to fix them yourself. > >I am a wrong person to ask how the test failure that may [*2*] block GGG submission can be circumvented, as I am not involved in that >machinery at all. > >Thanks. > > >[Footnotes] > >*1* Also I've seen osx-clang job time-out from time to time, without > failing any specific test. Re-running failed jobs from the menu > often make them pass, which is why I said "somewhat flaky". > >*2* I do not even know if GGG refuses to submit a series with a test > failure, let alone if it allows to override such a safety if > exists. Which tests have been hanging on S390? We have occasional hangs on NonStop that end up being attributed to our CI build system not supplying pipes properly to git. It would be interesting if the same tests are having issues on different platforms. --Randall
Looks like , I do not have sufficient permissions to rerun the tests. How do I proceed? Please suggest. Thank you Haritha On 01/03/24, 11:55 PM, "rsbecker@nexbridge.com <mailto:rsbecker@nexbridge.com>" <rsbecker@nexbridge.com <mailto:rsbecker@nexbridge.com>> wrote: On Friday, March 1, 2024 1:15 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >Haritha D <Harithamma.D@ibm.com <mailto:Harithamma.D@ibm.com>> writes: > >> The win test(7) test case failed stating the reason as "The Operation >> cancelled". I saw that it failed after 5 hours 59 minutes of running >> the test cases(build). How do I handle this? > >Those "win test (n)", at least some of them, seem to have been somewhat flaky [*1*]. If you are certain you did not break them with >your change, you do not have to fix them yourself. > >I am a wrong person to ask how the test failure that may [*2*] block GGG submission can be circumvented, as I am not involved in that >machinery at all. > >Thanks. > > >[Footnotes] > >*1* Also I've seen osx-clang job time-out from time to time, without > failing any specific test. Re-running failed jobs from the menu > often make them pass, which is why I said "somewhat flaky". > >*2* I do not even know if GGG refuses to submit a series with a test > failure, let alone if it allows to override such a safety if > exists. Which tests have been hanging on S390? We have occasional hangs on NonStop that end up being attributed to our CI build system not supplying pipes properly to git. It would be interesting if the same tests are having issues on different platforms. --Randall
diff --git a/config.mak.uname b/config.mak.uname index dacc95172dc..03ee2b74525 100644 --- a/config.mak.uname +++ b/config.mak.uname @@ -638,6 +638,18 @@ ifeq ($(uname_S),NONSTOP_KERNEL) SANE_TOOL_PATH = /usr/coreutils/bin:/usr/local/bin SHELL_PATH = /usr/coreutils/bin/bash endif +ifeq ($(uname_S),OS/390) + NO_SYS_POLL_H = YesPlease + NO_STRCASESTR = YesPlease + NO_REGEX = YesPlease + NO_MMAP = YesPlease + NO_NSEC = YesPlease + NO_STRLCPY = YesPlease + NO_MEMMEM = YesPlease + NO_GECOS_IN_PWENT = YesPlease + HAVE_STRINGS_H = YesPlease + NEEDS_MODE_TRANSLATION = YesPlease +endif ifeq ($(uname_S),MINGW) ifeq ($(shell expr "$(uname_R)" : '1\.'),2) $(error "Building with MSys is no longer supported")