Message ID | 20240229141554.836867-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Add support for QMC HDLC | expand |
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 03:15:48PM +0100, Herve Codina wrote: > Hi, > > This series introduces the QMC HDLC support. > > Patches were previously sent as part of a full feature series and were > previously reviewed in that context: > "Add support for QMC HDLC, framer infrastructure and PEF2256 framer" [1] > > In order to ease the merge, the full feature series has been split and > needed parts were merged in v6.8-rc1: > - "Prepare the PowerQUICC QMC and TSA for the HDLC QMC driver" [2] > - "Add support for framer infrastructure and PEF2256 framer" [3] > > This series contains patches related to the QMC HDLC part (QMC HDLC > driver): > - Introduce the QMC HDLC driver (patches 1 and 2) > - Add timeslots change support in QMC HDLC (patch 3) > - Add framer support as a framer consumer in QMC HDLC (patch 4) > > Compare to the original full feature series, a modification was done on > patch 3 in order to use a coherent prefix in the commit title. > > I kept the patches unsquashed as they were previously sent and reviewed. > Of course, I can squash them if needed. I think it's a good series and next version will be final. The only question is possible use of the returned values from bitmap_scatter()/bitmap_gather(), the rest are minors. Feel free to add Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> to patches 4 and 5.
Hi Andy, On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 17:23:32 +0200 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: ... > > I think it's a good series and next version will be final. The only question is > possible use of the returned values from bitmap_scatter()/bitmap_gather(), the > rest are minors. I replied about the reason why I didn't return any values from bitmap_{scatter,gather}() in that patch 4 discussion. Are you ok to keep them returning void in this series ? Best regards, Hervé
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 12:02:26PM +0100, Herve Codina wrote: > On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 17:23:32 +0200 > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: ... > > I think it's a good series and next version will be final. The only question is > > possible use of the returned values from bitmap_scatter()/bitmap_gather(), the > > rest are minors. > > I replied about the reason why I didn't return any values from > bitmap_{scatter,gather}() in that patch 4 discussion. > > Are you ok to keep them returning void in this series ? Sure. We can amend that later if needed.