diff mbox series

[13/16] KVM: x86/mmu: Handle no-slot faults at the beginning of kvm_faultin_pfn()

Message ID 20240228024147.41573-14-seanjc@google.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series KVM: x86/mmu: Page fault and MMIO cleanups | expand

Commit Message

Sean Christopherson Feb. 28, 2024, 2:41 a.m. UTC
Handle the "no memslot" case at the beginning of kvm_faultin_pfn(), just
after the private versus shared check, so that there's no need to
repeatedly query whether or not a slot exists.  This also makes it more
obvious that, except for private vs. shared attributes, the process of
faulting in a pfn simply doesn't apply to gfns without a slot.

Opportunistically stuff @fault's metadata in kvm_handle_noslot_fault() so
that it doesn't need to be duplicated in all paths that invoke
kvm_handle_noslot_fault(), and to minimize the probability of not stuffing
the right fields.

Leave the existing handle behind, but convert it to a WARN, to guard
against __kvm_faultin_pfn() unexpectedly nullifying fault->slot.

Cc: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c          | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Comments

Huang, Kai March 7, 2024, 12:48 a.m. UTC | #1
On 28/02/2024 3:41 pm, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Handle the "no memslot" case at the beginning of kvm_faultin_pfn(), just
> after the private versus shared check, so that there's no need to
> repeatedly query whether or not a slot exists.  This also makes it more
> obvious that, except for private vs. shared attributes, the process of
> faulting in a pfn simply doesn't apply to gfns without a slot.
> 
> Opportunistically stuff @fault's metadata in kvm_handle_noslot_fault() so
> that it doesn't need to be duplicated in all paths that invoke
> kvm_handle_noslot_fault(), and to minimize the probability of not stuffing
> the right fields.
> 
> Leave the existing handle behind, but convert it to a WARN, to guard
> against __kvm_faultin_pfn() unexpectedly nullifying fault->slot.
> 
> Cc: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>

Reviewed-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>

One nit ...


> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
> @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ struct kvm_page_fault {
>   	/* The memslot containing gfn. May be NULL. */
>   	struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
>   
> -	/* Outputs of kvm_faultin_pfn.  */
> +	/* Outputs of kvm_faultin_pfn. */
>   	unsigned long mmu_seq;
>   	kvm_pfn_t pfn;
>   	hva_t hva;

... how about get rid of this non-related fix?

Yeah it's annoying but do in a separate patch?
Sean Christopherson March 7, 2024, 12:53 a.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024, Kai Huang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 28/02/2024 3:41 pm, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
> > @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ struct kvm_page_fault {
> >   	/* The memslot containing gfn. May be NULL. */
> >   	struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
> > -	/* Outputs of kvm_faultin_pfn.  */
> > +	/* Outputs of kvm_faultin_pfn. */
> >   	unsigned long mmu_seq;
> >   	kvm_pfn_t pfn;
> >   	hva_t hva;
> 
> ... how about get rid of this non-related fix?

Eww, yeah, I'll drop it.  I originally had code that made the outputs valid if
and only if @slot was non-null, and had updated the comment accordingly, but
ended up going a different route and cleaned up the comment a little too well :-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 8aa957f0a717..4dee0999a66e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -3322,6 +3322,10 @@  static int kvm_handle_noslot_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	vcpu_cache_mmio_info(vcpu, gva, fault->gfn,
 			     access & shadow_mmio_access_mask);
 
+	fault->slot = NULL;
+	fault->pfn = KVM_PFN_NOSLOT;
+	fault->map_writable = false;
+
 	/*
 	 * If MMIO caching is disabled, emulate immediately without
 	 * touching the shadow page tables as attempting to install an
@@ -4393,15 +4397,18 @@  static int kvm_faultin_pfn(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault,
 		return -EFAULT;
 	}
 
+	if (unlikely(!slot))
+		return kvm_handle_noslot_fault(vcpu, fault, access);
+
 	/*
 	 * Retry the page fault if the gfn hit a memslot that is being deleted
 	 * or moved.  This ensures any existing SPTEs for the old memslot will
 	 * be zapped before KVM inserts a new MMIO SPTE for the gfn.
 	 */
-	if (slot && (slot->flags & KVM_MEMSLOT_INVALID))
+	if (slot->flags & KVM_MEMSLOT_INVALID)
 		return RET_PF_RETRY;
 
-	if (slot && slot->id == APIC_ACCESS_PAGE_PRIVATE_MEMSLOT) {
+	if (slot->id == APIC_ACCESS_PAGE_PRIVATE_MEMSLOT) {
 		/*
 		 * Don't map L1's APIC access page into L2, KVM doesn't support
 		 * using APICv/AVIC to accelerate L2 accesses to L1's APIC,
@@ -4413,12 +4420,9 @@  static int kvm_faultin_pfn(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault,
 		 * uses different roots for L1 vs. L2, i.e. there is no danger
 		 * of breaking APICv/AVIC for L1.
 		 */
-		if (is_guest_mode(vcpu)) {
-			fault->slot = NULL;
-			fault->pfn = KVM_PFN_NOSLOT;
-			fault->map_writable = false;
-			goto faultin_done;
-		}
+		if (is_guest_mode(vcpu))
+			return kvm_handle_noslot_fault(vcpu, fault, access);
+
 		/*
 		 * If the APIC access page exists but is disabled, go directly
 		 * to emulation without caching the MMIO access or creating a
@@ -4429,6 +4433,9 @@  static int kvm_faultin_pfn(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault,
 			return RET_PF_EMULATE;
 	}
 
+	fault->mmu_seq = vcpu->kvm->mmu_invalidate_seq;
+	smp_rmb();
+
 	/*
 	 * Check for a relevant mmu_notifier invalidation event before getting
 	 * the pfn from the primary MMU, and before acquiring mmu_lock.
@@ -4450,19 +4457,17 @@  static int kvm_faultin_pfn(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault,
 	 * *guaranteed* to need to retry, i.e. waiting until mmu_lock is held
 	 * to detect retry guarantees the worst case latency for the vCPU.
 	 */
-	if (fault->slot &&
-	    mmu_invalidate_retry_gfn_unsafe(vcpu->kvm, fault->mmu_seq, fault->gfn))
+	if (mmu_invalidate_retry_gfn_unsafe(vcpu->kvm, fault->mmu_seq, fault->gfn))
 		return RET_PF_RETRY;
 
 	ret = __kvm_faultin_pfn(vcpu, fault);
 	if (ret != RET_PF_CONTINUE)
 		return ret;
 
-faultin_done:
 	if (unlikely(is_error_pfn(fault->pfn)))
 		return kvm_handle_error_pfn(vcpu, fault);
 
-	if (unlikely(!fault->slot))
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!fault->slot))
 		return kvm_handle_noslot_fault(vcpu, fault, access);
 
 	/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
index d7c10d338f14..74736d517e74 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@  struct kvm_page_fault {
 	/* The memslot containing gfn. May be NULL. */
 	struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
 
-	/* Outputs of kvm_faultin_pfn.  */
+	/* Outputs of kvm_faultin_pfn. */
 	unsigned long mmu_seq;
 	kvm_pfn_t pfn;
 	hva_t hva;