Message ID | cover.1709913674.git.jani.nikula@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | drm: fix .get_modes() return values | expand |
Hi Am 08.03.24 um 17:03 schrieb Jani Nikula: > The drm_connector_helper_funcs .get_modes() hooks are not supposed to > return negative error codes. Some do, but they're not checked, and could > lead to mysterious errors. Fix this all over the place. Acked-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> for the series. Do you plan to make the return type an unsigned int eventually? Best regards Thomas > > BR, > Jani. > > Jani Nikula (8): > drm/probe-helper: warn about negative .get_modes() > drm/panel: do not return negative error codes from > drm_panel_get_modes() > drm/exynos: do not return negative values from .get_modes() > drm/bridge: lt8912b: do not return negative values from .get_modes() > drm/imx/ipuv3: do not return negative values from .get_modes() > drm/vc4: hdmi: do not return negative values from .get_modes() > drm/bridge: lt9611uxc: use int for holding number of modes > drm/exynos: simplify the return value handling in > exynos_dp_get_modes() > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt8912b.c | 16 +++++++--------- > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611uxc.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c | 17 +++++++++++------ > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_probe_helper.c | 7 +++++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp.c | 7 +++---- > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_vidi.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_hdmi.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/gpu/drm/imx/ipuv3/parallel-display.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c | 2 +- > include/drm/drm_modeset_helper_vtables.h | 3 ++- > 10 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) >
On Fri, 08 Mar 2024, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> wrote: > Acked-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> > > for the series. Thanks, pushed the lot to drm-misc-next-fixes. > Do you plan to make the return type an unsigned int eventually? Not really. The hooks could still return -ENOMEM or something, with no compiler warnings, and you'd be screwed because you wouldn't even have a way of checking. You'd just get 4294967284 modes. BR, Jani.