| Message ID | 20240320180429.678181-11-hannes@cmpxchg.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | mm: page_alloc: freelist migratetype hygiene | expand |
On 3/20/24 7:02 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote: > Free page accounting currently happens a bit too high up the call > stack, where it has to deal with guard pages, compaction capturing, > block stealing and even page isolation. This is subtle and fragile, > and makes it difficult to hack on the code. > > Now that type violations on the freelists have been fixed, push the > accounting down to where pages enter and leave the freelist. Awesome! > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Just some nits: > @@ -1314,10 +1349,10 @@ static inline void expand(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, > * Corresponding page table entries will not be touched, > * pages will stay not present in virtual address space > */ > - if (set_page_guard(zone, &page[size], high, migratetype)) > + if (set_page_guard(zone, &page[size], high)) > continue; > > - add_to_free_list(&page[size], zone, high, migratetype); > + add_to_free_list(&page[size], zone, high, migratetype, false); This is account_freepages() in the hot loop, what if we instead used __add_to_free_list(), sum up nr_pages and called account_freepages() once outside of the loop? > set_buddy_order(&page[size], high); > } > } <snip> > diff --git a/mm/page_isolation.c b/mm/page_isolation.c > index 042937d5abe4..914a71c580d8 100644 > --- a/mm/page_isolation.c > +++ b/mm/page_isolation.c > @@ -252,7 +252,8 @@ static void unset_migratetype_isolate(struct page *page, int migratetype) > * Isolating this block already succeeded, so this > * should not fail on zone boundaries. > */ > - WARN_ON_ONCE(!move_freepages_block_isolate(zone, page, migratetype)); > + WARN_ON_ONCE(!move_freepages_block_isolate(zone, page, > + migratetype)); > } else { > set_pageblock_migratetype(page, migratetype); > __putback_isolated_page(page, order, migratetype); Looks like a drive-by edit of an extra file just to adjust identation.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 09:54:01AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 3/20/24 7:02 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote: > > Free page accounting currently happens a bit too high up the call > > stack, where it has to deal with guard pages, compaction capturing, > > block stealing and even page isolation. This is subtle and fragile, > > and makes it difficult to hack on the code. > > > > Now that type violations on the freelists have been fixed, push the > > accounting down to where pages enter and leave the freelist. > > Awesome! > > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> > > Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> > > Just some nits: > > > @@ -1314,10 +1349,10 @@ static inline void expand(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, > > * Corresponding page table entries will not be touched, > > * pages will stay not present in virtual address space > > */ > > - if (set_page_guard(zone, &page[size], high, migratetype)) > > + if (set_page_guard(zone, &page[size], high)) > > continue; > > > > - add_to_free_list(&page[size], zone, high, migratetype); > > + add_to_free_list(&page[size], zone, high, migratetype, false); > > This is account_freepages() in the hot loop, what if we instead used > __add_to_free_list(), sum up nr_pages and called account_freepages() once > outside of the loop? Good idea. I'll send a fixlet for that. > > set_buddy_order(&page[size], high); > > } > > } > > <snip> > > > diff --git a/mm/page_isolation.c b/mm/page_isolation.c > > index 042937d5abe4..914a71c580d8 100644 > > --- a/mm/page_isolation.c > > +++ b/mm/page_isolation.c > > @@ -252,7 +252,8 @@ static void unset_migratetype_isolate(struct page *page, int migratetype) > > * Isolating this block already succeeded, so this > > * should not fail on zone boundaries. > > */ > > - WARN_ON_ONCE(!move_freepages_block_isolate(zone, page, migratetype)); > > + WARN_ON_ONCE(!move_freepages_block_isolate(zone, page, > > + migratetype)); > > } else { > > set_pageblock_migratetype(page, migratetype); > > __putback_isolated_page(page, order, migratetype); > > Looks like a drive-by edit of an extra file just to adjust identation. Argh, yeah, I think an earlier version mucked with the signature and I didn't undo that cleanly. I'll send a fixlet for that too. Thanks for the review!
On 2024/3/21 02:02, Johannes Weiner wrote: > Free page accounting currently happens a bit too high up the call > stack, where it has to deal with guard pages, compaction capturing, > block stealing and even page isolation. This is subtle and fragile, > and makes it difficult to hack on the code. > > Now that type violations on the freelists have been fixed, push the > accounting down to where pages enter and leave the freelist. > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> > --- > include/linux/mm.h | 18 ++-- > include/linux/vmstat.h | 8 -- > mm/debug_page_alloc.c | 12 +-- > mm/internal.h | 5 -- > mm/page_alloc.c | 194 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ > mm/page_isolation.c | 3 +- > 6 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 120 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h > index 8147b1302413..bd2e94391c7e 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mm.h > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h > @@ -3781,24 +3781,22 @@ static inline bool page_is_guard(struct page *page) > return PageGuard(page); > } > > -bool __set_page_guard(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, unsigned int order, > - int migratetype); > +bool __set_page_guard(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, unsigned int order); > static inline bool set_page_guard(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, > - unsigned int order, int migratetype) > + unsigned int order) > { > if (!debug_guardpage_enabled()) > return false; > - return __set_page_guard(zone, page, order, migratetype); > + return __set_page_guard(zone, page, order); > } > > -void __clear_page_guard(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, unsigned int order, > - int migratetype); > +void __clear_page_guard(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, unsigned int order); > static inline void clear_page_guard(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, > - unsigned int order, int migratetype) > + unsigned int order) > { > if (!debug_guardpage_enabled()) > return; > - __clear_page_guard(zone, page, order, migratetype); > + __clear_page_guard(zone, page, order); > } > > #else /* CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC */ > @@ -3808,9 +3806,9 @@ static inline unsigned int debug_guardpage_minorder(void) { return 0; } > static inline bool debug_guardpage_enabled(void) { return false; } > static inline bool page_is_guard(struct page *page) { return false; } > static inline bool set_page_guard(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, > - unsigned int order, int migratetype) { return false; } > + unsigned int order) { return false; } > static inline void clear_page_guard(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, > - unsigned int order, int migratetype) {} > + unsigned int order) {} > #endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC */ > > #ifdef __HAVE_ARCH_GATE_AREA > diff --git a/include/linux/vmstat.h b/include/linux/vmstat.h > index 343906a98d6e..735eae6e272c 100644 > --- a/include/linux/vmstat.h > +++ b/include/linux/vmstat.h > @@ -487,14 +487,6 @@ static inline void node_stat_sub_folio(struct folio *folio, > mod_node_page_state(folio_pgdat(folio), item, -folio_nr_pages(folio)); > } > > -static inline void __mod_zone_freepage_state(struct zone *zone, int nr_pages, > - int migratetype) > -{ > - __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES, nr_pages); > - if (is_migrate_cma(migratetype)) > - __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES, nr_pages); > -} > - > extern const char * const vmstat_text[]; > > static inline const char *zone_stat_name(enum zone_stat_item item) > diff --git a/mm/debug_page_alloc.c b/mm/debug_page_alloc.c > index 6755f0c9d4a3..d46acf989dde 100644 > --- a/mm/debug_page_alloc.c > +++ b/mm/debug_page_alloc.c > @@ -32,8 +32,7 @@ static int __init debug_guardpage_minorder_setup(char *buf) > } > early_param("debug_guardpage_minorder", debug_guardpage_minorder_setup); > > -bool __set_page_guard(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, unsigned int order, > - int migratetype) > +bool __set_page_guard(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, unsigned int order) > { > if (order >= debug_guardpage_minorder()) > return false; > @@ -41,19 +40,12 @@ bool __set_page_guard(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, unsigned int order, > __SetPageGuard(page); > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&page->buddy_list); > set_page_private(page, order); > - /* Guard pages are not available for any usage */ > - if (!is_migrate_isolate(migratetype)) > - __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, -(1 << order), migratetype); > > return true; > } > > -void __clear_page_guard(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, unsigned int order, > - int migratetype) > +void __clear_page_guard(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, unsigned int order) > { > __ClearPageGuard(page); > - > set_page_private(page, 0); > - if (!is_migrate_isolate(migratetype)) > - __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, (1 << order), migratetype); > } > diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h > index d6e6c7d9f04e..0a4007b03d0d 100644 > --- a/mm/internal.h > +++ b/mm/internal.h > @@ -1036,11 +1036,6 @@ static inline bool is_migrate_highatomic(enum migratetype migratetype) > return migratetype == MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC; > } > > -static inline bool is_migrate_highatomic_page(struct page *page) > -{ > - return get_pageblock_migratetype(page) == MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC; > -} > - > void setup_zone_pageset(struct zone *zone); > > struct migration_target_control { > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > index efb2581ac142..c46491f83ac2 100644 > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > @@ -642,42 +642,72 @@ compaction_capture(struct capture_control *capc, struct page *page, > } > #endif /* CONFIG_COMPACTION */ > > -/* Used for pages not on another list */ > -static inline void add_to_free_list(struct page *page, struct zone *zone, > - unsigned int order, int migratetype) > +static inline void account_freepages(struct page *page, struct zone *zone, > + int nr_pages, int migratetype) > { > - struct free_area *area = &zone->free_area[order]; > + if (is_migrate_isolate(migratetype)) > + return; > > - list_add(&page->buddy_list, &area->free_list[migratetype]); > - area->nr_free++; > + __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES, nr_pages); > + > + if (is_migrate_cma(migratetype)) > + __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES, nr_pages); > } > > /* Used for pages not on another list */ > -static inline void add_to_free_list_tail(struct page *page, struct zone *zone, > - unsigned int order, int migratetype) > +static inline void __add_to_free_list(struct page *page, struct zone *zone, > + unsigned int order, int migratetype, > + bool tail) > { > struct free_area *area = &zone->free_area[order]; > > - list_add_tail(&page->buddy_list, &area->free_list[migratetype]); > + VM_WARN_ONCE(get_pageblock_migratetype(page) != migratetype, > + "page type is %lu, passed migratetype is %d (nr=%d)\n", > + get_pageblock_migratetype(page), migratetype, 1 << order); > + > + if (tail) > + list_add_tail(&page->buddy_list, &area->free_list[migratetype]); > + else > + list_add(&page->buddy_list, &area->free_list[migratetype]); > area->nr_free++; > } > > +static inline void add_to_free_list(struct page *page, struct zone *zone, > + unsigned int order, int migratetype, > + bool tail) > +{ > + __add_to_free_list(page, zone, order, migratetype, tail); > + account_freepages(page, zone, 1 << order, migratetype); > +} > + > /* > * Used for pages which are on another list. Move the pages to the tail > * of the list - so the moved pages won't immediately be considered for > * allocation again (e.g., optimization for memory onlining). > */ > static inline void move_to_free_list(struct page *page, struct zone *zone, > - unsigned int order, int migratetype) > + unsigned int order, int old_mt, int new_mt) > { > struct free_area *area = &zone->free_area[order]; > > - list_move_tail(&page->buddy_list, &area->free_list[migratetype]); > + /* Free page moving can fail, so it happens before the type update */ > + VM_WARN_ONCE(get_pageblock_migratetype(page) != old_mt, > + "page type is %lu, passed migratetype is %d (nr=%d)\n", > + get_pageblock_migratetype(page), old_mt, 1 << order); > + > + list_move_tail(&page->buddy_list, &area->free_list[new_mt]); > + > + account_freepages(page, zone, -(1 << order), old_mt); > + account_freepages(page, zone, 1 << order, new_mt); > } > > -static inline void del_page_from_free_list(struct page *page, struct zone *zone, > - unsigned int order) > +static inline void __del_page_from_free_list(struct page *page, struct zone *zone, > + unsigned int order, int migratetype) > { > + VM_WARN_ONCE(get_pageblock_migratetype(page) != migratetype, > + "page type is %lu, passed migratetype is %d (nr=%d)\n", > + get_pageblock_migratetype(page), migratetype, 1 << order); > + > /* clear reported state and update reported page count */ > if (page_reported(page)) > __ClearPageReported(page); > @@ -688,6 +718,13 @@ static inline void del_page_from_free_list(struct page *page, struct zone *zone, > zone->free_area[order].nr_free--; > } > > +static inline void del_page_from_free_list(struct page *page, struct zone *zone, > + unsigned int order, int migratetype) > +{ > + __del_page_from_free_list(page, zone, order, migratetype); > + account_freepages(page, zone, -(1 << order), migratetype); > +} > + > static inline struct page *get_page_from_free_area(struct free_area *area, > int migratetype) > { > @@ -759,18 +796,16 @@ static inline void __free_one_page(struct page *page, > VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page->flags & PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP, page); > > VM_BUG_ON(migratetype == -1); > - if (likely(!is_migrate_isolate(migratetype))) > - __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, 1 << order, migratetype); > - > VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(pfn & ((1 << order) - 1), page); > VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(bad_range(zone, page), page); > > + account_freepages(page, zone, 1 << order, migratetype); > + > while (order < MAX_PAGE_ORDER) { > - if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) { > - __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, -(1 << order), > - migratetype); > + int buddy_mt = migratetype; > + > + if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) > return; > - } IIUC, if the released page is captured by compaction, then the statistics for free pages should be correspondingly decreased, otherwise, there will be a slight regression for my thpcompact benchmark. thpcompact Percentage Faults Huge k6.9-rc2-base base + patch10 + 2 fixes Percentage huge-1 78.18 ( 0.00%) 71.92 ( -8.01%) Percentage huge-3 86.70 ( 0.00%) 86.07 ( -0.73%) Percentage huge-5 90.26 ( 0.00%) 78.02 ( -13.57%) Percentage huge-7 92.34 ( 0.00%) 78.67 ( -14.81%) Percentage huge-12 91.18 ( 0.00%) 81.04 ( -11.12%) Percentage huge-18 89.00 ( 0.00%) 79.57 ( -10.60%) Percentage huge-24 90.52 ( 0.00%) 80.07 ( -11.54%) Percentage huge-30 94.44 ( 0.00%) 96.28 ( 1.95%) Percentage huge-32 93.09 ( 0.00%) 99.39 ( 6.77%) I add below fix based on your fix 2, then the thpcompact Percentage looks good. How do you think for the fix? diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index 8330c5c2de6b..2facf844ef84 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -805,8 +805,10 @@ static inline void __free_one_page(struct page *page, while (order < MAX_PAGE_ORDER) { int buddy_mt = migratetype; - if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) + if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) { + account_freepages(zone, -(1 << order), migratetype); return; + } buddy = find_buddy_page_pfn(page, pfn, order, &buddy_pfn); if (!buddy) With my fix, the THP percentage looks better: k6.9-rc2-base base + patch10 + 2 fixes + my fix Percentage huge-1 78.18 ( 0.00%) 82.83 ( 5.94%) Percentage huge-3 86.70 ( 0.00%) 93.47 ( 7.81%) Percentage huge-5 90.26 ( 0.00%) 94.73 ( 4.95%) Percentage huge-7 92.34 ( 0.00%) 95.22 ( 3.12%) Percentage huge-12 91.18 ( 0.00%) 92.40 ( 1.34%) Percentage huge-18 89.00 ( 0.00%) 85.39 ( -4.06%) Percentage huge-24 90.52 ( 0.00%) 94.70 ( 4.61%) Percentage huge-30 94.44 ( 0.00%) 97.00 ( 2.71%) Percentage huge-32 93.09 ( 0.00%) 92.87 ( -0.24%)
On 4/7/24 12:19 PM, Baolin Wang wrote: > On 2024/3/21 02:02, Johannes Weiner wrote: >> >> + account_freepages(page, zone, 1 << order, migratetype); >> + >> while (order < MAX_PAGE_ORDER) { >> - if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) { >> - __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, -(1 << order), >> - migratetype); >> + int buddy_mt = migratetype; >> + >> + if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) >> return; >> - } > > IIUC, if the released page is captured by compaction, then the > statistics for free pages should be correspondingly decreased, > otherwise, there will be a slight regression for my thpcompact benchmark. > > thpcompact Percentage Faults Huge > k6.9-rc2-base base + patch10 + 2 fixes > Percentage huge-1 78.18 ( 0.00%) 71.92 ( -8.01%) > Percentage huge-3 86.70 ( 0.00%) 86.07 ( -0.73%) > Percentage huge-5 90.26 ( 0.00%) 78.02 ( -13.57%) > Percentage huge-7 92.34 ( 0.00%) 78.67 ( -14.81%) > Percentage huge-12 91.18 ( 0.00%) 81.04 ( -11.12%) > Percentage huge-18 89.00 ( 0.00%) 79.57 ( -10.60%) > Percentage huge-24 90.52 ( 0.00%) 80.07 ( -11.54%) > Percentage huge-30 94.44 ( 0.00%) 96.28 ( 1.95%) > Percentage huge-32 93.09 ( 0.00%) 99.39 ( 6.77%) > > I add below fix based on your fix 2, then the thpcompact Percentage > looks good. How do you think for the fix? Yeah another well spotted, thanks. "slight regression" is an understatement, this affects not just a "statistics" but very important counter NR_FREE_PAGES which IIUC would eventually become larger than reality, make the watermark checks false positive and result in depleted reserves etc etc. Actually wondering why we're not seeing -next failures already (or maybe I just haven't noticed). > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > index 8330c5c2de6b..2facf844ef84 100644 > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > @@ -805,8 +805,10 @@ static inline void __free_one_page(struct page *page, > while (order < MAX_PAGE_ORDER) { > int buddy_mt = migratetype; > > - if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) > + if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) { > + account_freepages(zone, -(1 << order), migratetype); > return; > + } > > buddy = find_buddy_page_pfn(page, pfn, order, &buddy_pfn); > if (!buddy) > > With my fix, the THP percentage looks better: > k6.9-rc2-base base + patch10 + 2 fixes + > my fix > Percentage huge-1 78.18 ( 0.00%) 82.83 ( 5.94%) > Percentage huge-3 86.70 ( 0.00%) 93.47 ( 7.81%) > Percentage huge-5 90.26 ( 0.00%) 94.73 ( 4.95%) > Percentage huge-7 92.34 ( 0.00%) 95.22 ( 3.12%) > Percentage huge-12 91.18 ( 0.00%) 92.40 ( 1.34%) > Percentage huge-18 89.00 ( 0.00%) 85.39 ( -4.06%) > Percentage huge-24 90.52 ( 0.00%) 94.70 ( 4.61%) > Percentage huge-30 94.44 ( 0.00%) 97.00 ( 2.71%) > Percentage huge-32 93.09 ( 0.00%) 92.87 ( -0.24%)
On 2024/4/8 15:38, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 4/7/24 12:19 PM, Baolin Wang wrote: >> On 2024/3/21 02:02, Johannes Weiner wrote: >>> >>> + account_freepages(page, zone, 1 << order, migratetype); >>> + >>> while (order < MAX_PAGE_ORDER) { >>> - if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) { >>> - __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, -(1 << order), >>> - migratetype); >>> + int buddy_mt = migratetype; >>> + >>> + if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) >>> return; >>> - } >> >> IIUC, if the released page is captured by compaction, then the >> statistics for free pages should be correspondingly decreased, >> otherwise, there will be a slight regression for my thpcompact benchmark. >> >> thpcompact Percentage Faults Huge >> k6.9-rc2-base base + patch10 + 2 fixes >> Percentage huge-1 78.18 ( 0.00%) 71.92 ( -8.01%) >> Percentage huge-3 86.70 ( 0.00%) 86.07 ( -0.73%) >> Percentage huge-5 90.26 ( 0.00%) 78.02 ( -13.57%) >> Percentage huge-7 92.34 ( 0.00%) 78.67 ( -14.81%) >> Percentage huge-12 91.18 ( 0.00%) 81.04 ( -11.12%) >> Percentage huge-18 89.00 ( 0.00%) 79.57 ( -10.60%) >> Percentage huge-24 90.52 ( 0.00%) 80.07 ( -11.54%) >> Percentage huge-30 94.44 ( 0.00%) 96.28 ( 1.95%) >> Percentage huge-32 93.09 ( 0.00%) 99.39 ( 6.77%) >> >> I add below fix based on your fix 2, then the thpcompact Percentage >> looks good. How do you think for the fix? > > Yeah another well spotted, thanks. "slight regression" is an understatement, Thanks for helping to confirm. > this affects not just a "statistics" but very important counter > NR_FREE_PAGES which IIUC would eventually become larger than reality, make > the watermark checks false positive and result in depleted reserves etc etc. Right, agree. > Actually wondering why we're not seeing -next failures already (or maybe I > just haven't noticed). > >> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c >> index 8330c5c2de6b..2facf844ef84 100644 >> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c >> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c >> @@ -805,8 +805,10 @@ static inline void __free_one_page(struct page *page, >> while (order < MAX_PAGE_ORDER) { >> int buddy_mt = migratetype; >> >> - if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) >> + if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) { >> + account_freepages(zone, -(1 << order), migratetype); >> return; >> + } >> >> buddy = find_buddy_page_pfn(page, pfn, order, &buddy_pfn); >> if (!buddy) >> >> With my fix, the THP percentage looks better: >> k6.9-rc2-base base + patch10 + 2 fixes + >> my fix >> Percentage huge-1 78.18 ( 0.00%) 82.83 ( 5.94%) >> Percentage huge-3 86.70 ( 0.00%) 93.47 ( 7.81%) >> Percentage huge-5 90.26 ( 0.00%) 94.73 ( 4.95%) >> Percentage huge-7 92.34 ( 0.00%) 95.22 ( 3.12%) >> Percentage huge-12 91.18 ( 0.00%) 92.40 ( 1.34%) >> Percentage huge-18 89.00 ( 0.00%) 85.39 ( -4.06%) >> Percentage huge-24 90.52 ( 0.00%) 94.70 ( 4.61%) >> Percentage huge-30 94.44 ( 0.00%) 97.00 ( 2.71%) >> Percentage huge-32 93.09 ( 0.00%) 92.87 ( -0.24%)
On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 09:38:20AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 4/7/24 12:19 PM, Baolin Wang wrote: > > On 2024/3/21 02:02, Johannes Weiner wrote: > >> > >> + account_freepages(page, zone, 1 << order, migratetype); > >> + > >> while (order < MAX_PAGE_ORDER) { > >> - if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) { > >> - __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, -(1 << order), > >> - migratetype); > >> + int buddy_mt = migratetype; > >> + > >> + if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) > >> return; > >> - } > > > > IIUC, if the released page is captured by compaction, then the > > statistics for free pages should be correspondingly decreased, > > otherwise, there will be a slight regression for my thpcompact benchmark. > > > > thpcompact Percentage Faults Huge > > k6.9-rc2-base base + patch10 + 2 fixes > > Percentage huge-1 78.18 ( 0.00%) 71.92 ( -8.01%) > > Percentage huge-3 86.70 ( 0.00%) 86.07 ( -0.73%) > > Percentage huge-5 90.26 ( 0.00%) 78.02 ( -13.57%) > > Percentage huge-7 92.34 ( 0.00%) 78.67 ( -14.81%) > > Percentage huge-12 91.18 ( 0.00%) 81.04 ( -11.12%) > > Percentage huge-18 89.00 ( 0.00%) 79.57 ( -10.60%) > > Percentage huge-24 90.52 ( 0.00%) 80.07 ( -11.54%) > > Percentage huge-30 94.44 ( 0.00%) 96.28 ( 1.95%) > > Percentage huge-32 93.09 ( 0.00%) 99.39 ( 6.77%) > > > > I add below fix based on your fix 2, then the thpcompact Percentage > > looks good. How do you think for the fix? > > Yeah another well spotted, thanks. "slight regression" is an understatement, > this affects not just a "statistics" but very important counter > NR_FREE_PAGES which IIUC would eventually become larger than reality, make > the watermark checks false positive and result in depleted reserves etc etc. > Actually wondering why we're not seeing -next failures already (or maybe I > just haven't noticed). Good catch indeed. Trying to understand why I didn't notice this during testing, and I think it's because I had order-10 pageblocks in my config. There is this in compaction_capture(): if (order < pageblock_order && migratetype == MIGRATE_MOVABLE) return false; Most compaction is for order-9 THPs on movable blocks, so I didn't get much capturing in practice in order for that leak to be noticable. In earlier versions of the patches I had more aggressive capturing, but also did the accounting in add_page_to/del_page_from_freelist(), so capturing only steals what's already accounted to be off list. With the __add/__del and the consolidated account_freepages() optimization, compaction_capture() needs explicit accounting again. > > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > > index 8330c5c2de6b..2facf844ef84 100644 > > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > > @@ -805,8 +805,10 @@ static inline void __free_one_page(struct page *page, > > while (order < MAX_PAGE_ORDER) { > > int buddy_mt = migratetype; > > > > - if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) > > + if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) { > > + account_freepages(zone, -(1 << order), migratetype); > > return; > > + } > > > > buddy = find_buddy_page_pfn(page, pfn, order, &buddy_pfn); > > if (!buddy) > > > > With my fix, the THP percentage looks better: > > k6.9-rc2-base base + patch10 + 2 fixes + > > my fix > > Percentage huge-1 78.18 ( 0.00%) 82.83 ( 5.94%) > > Percentage huge-3 86.70 ( 0.00%) 93.47 ( 7.81%) > > Percentage huge-5 90.26 ( 0.00%) 94.73 ( 4.95%) > > Percentage huge-7 92.34 ( 0.00%) 95.22 ( 3.12%) > > Percentage huge-12 91.18 ( 0.00%) 92.40 ( 1.34%) > > Percentage huge-18 89.00 ( 0.00%) 85.39 ( -4.06%) > > Percentage huge-24 90.52 ( 0.00%) 94.70 ( 4.61%) > > Percentage huge-30 94.44 ( 0.00%) 97.00 ( 2.71%) > > Percentage huge-32 93.09 ( 0.00%) 92.87 ( -0.24%) Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> With fixed indentation: diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index 70f82635f650..96815e3c22f2 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -805,8 +805,10 @@ static inline void __free_one_page(struct page *page, while (order < MAX_PAGE_ORDER) { int buddy_mt = migratetype; - if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) + if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) { + account_freepages(zone, -(1 << order), migratetype); return; + } buddy = find_buddy_page_pfn(page, pfn, order, &buddy_pfn); if (!buddy)
On 4/8/24 4:23 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 09:38:20AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >> On 4/7/24 12:19 PM, Baolin Wang wrote: >> > On 2024/3/21 02:02, Johannes Weiner wrote: >> >> >> >> + account_freepages(page, zone, 1 << order, migratetype); >> >> + >> >> while (order < MAX_PAGE_ORDER) { >> >> - if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) { >> >> - __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, -(1 << order), >> >> - migratetype); >> >> + int buddy_mt = migratetype; >> >> + >> >> + if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) >> >> return; >> >> - } >> > >> > IIUC, if the released page is captured by compaction, then the >> > statistics for free pages should be correspondingly decreased, >> > otherwise, there will be a slight regression for my thpcompact benchmark. >> > >> > thpcompact Percentage Faults Huge >> > k6.9-rc2-base base + patch10 + 2 fixes >> > Percentage huge-1 78.18 ( 0.00%) 71.92 ( -8.01%) >> > Percentage huge-3 86.70 ( 0.00%) 86.07 ( -0.73%) >> > Percentage huge-5 90.26 ( 0.00%) 78.02 ( -13.57%) >> > Percentage huge-7 92.34 ( 0.00%) 78.67 ( -14.81%) >> > Percentage huge-12 91.18 ( 0.00%) 81.04 ( -11.12%) >> > Percentage huge-18 89.00 ( 0.00%) 79.57 ( -10.60%) >> > Percentage huge-24 90.52 ( 0.00%) 80.07 ( -11.54%) >> > Percentage huge-30 94.44 ( 0.00%) 96.28 ( 1.95%) >> > Percentage huge-32 93.09 ( 0.00%) 99.39 ( 6.77%) >> > >> > I add below fix based on your fix 2, then the thpcompact Percentage >> > looks good. How do you think for the fix? >> >> Yeah another well spotted, thanks. "slight regression" is an understatement, >> this affects not just a "statistics" but very important counter >> NR_FREE_PAGES which IIUC would eventually become larger than reality, make >> the watermark checks false positive and result in depleted reserves etc etc. >> Actually wondering why we're not seeing -next failures already (or maybe I >> just haven't noticed). > > Good catch indeed. > > Trying to understand why I didn't notice this during testing, and I > think it's because I had order-10 pageblocks in my config. There is > this in compaction_capture(): > > if (order < pageblock_order && migratetype == MIGRATE_MOVABLE) > return false; > > Most compaction is for order-9 THPs on movable blocks, so I didn't get > much capturing in practice in order for that leak to be noticable. > > In earlier versions of the patches I had more aggressive capturing, > but also did the accounting in add_page_to/del_page_from_freelist(), > so capturing only steals what's already accounted to be off list. > > With the __add/__del and the consolidated account_freepages() > optimization, compaction_capture() needs explicit accounting again. > >> > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c >> > index 8330c5c2de6b..2facf844ef84 100644 >> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c >> > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c >> > @@ -805,8 +805,10 @@ static inline void __free_one_page(struct page *page, >> > while (order < MAX_PAGE_ORDER) { >> > int buddy_mt = migratetype; >> > >> > - if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) >> > + if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) { >> > + account_freepages(zone, -(1 << order), migratetype); >> > return; >> > + } >> > >> > buddy = find_buddy_page_pfn(page, pfn, order, &buddy_pfn); >> > if (!buddy) >> > >> > With my fix, the THP percentage looks better: >> > k6.9-rc2-base base + patch10 + 2 fixes + >> > my fix >> > Percentage huge-1 78.18 ( 0.00%) 82.83 ( 5.94%) >> > Percentage huge-3 86.70 ( 0.00%) 93.47 ( 7.81%) >> > Percentage huge-5 90.26 ( 0.00%) 94.73 ( 4.95%) >> > Percentage huge-7 92.34 ( 0.00%) 95.22 ( 3.12%) >> > Percentage huge-12 91.18 ( 0.00%) 92.40 ( 1.34%) >> > Percentage huge-18 89.00 ( 0.00%) 85.39 ( -4.06%) >> > Percentage huge-24 90.52 ( 0.00%) 94.70 ( 4.61%) >> > Percentage huge-30 94.44 ( 0.00%) 97.00 ( 2.71%) >> > Percentage huge-32 93.09 ( 0.00%) 92.87 ( -0.24%) > > Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> > With fixed indentation: Maybe Baolin could resend the finalized 2 fixups in a more ready-to-pick form? > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > index 70f82635f650..96815e3c22f2 100644 > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > @@ -805,8 +805,10 @@ static inline void __free_one_page(struct page *page, > while (order < MAX_PAGE_ORDER) { > int buddy_mt = migratetype; > > - if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) > + if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) { > + account_freepages(zone, -(1 << order), migratetype); > return; > + } > > buddy = find_buddy_page_pfn(page, pfn, order, &buddy_pfn); > if (!buddy)
On 2024/4/9 14:23, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 4/8/24 4:23 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 09:38:20AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >>> On 4/7/24 12:19 PM, Baolin Wang wrote: >>>> On 2024/3/21 02:02, Johannes Weiner wrote: >>>>> >>>>> + account_freepages(page, zone, 1 << order, migratetype); >>>>> + >>>>> while (order < MAX_PAGE_ORDER) { >>>>> - if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) { >>>>> - __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, -(1 << order), >>>>> - migratetype); >>>>> + int buddy_mt = migratetype; >>>>> + >>>>> + if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) >>>>> return; >>>>> - } >>>> >>>> IIUC, if the released page is captured by compaction, then the >>>> statistics for free pages should be correspondingly decreased, >>>> otherwise, there will be a slight regression for my thpcompact benchmark. >>>> >>>> thpcompact Percentage Faults Huge >>>> k6.9-rc2-base base + patch10 + 2 fixes >>>> Percentage huge-1 78.18 ( 0.00%) 71.92 ( -8.01%) >>>> Percentage huge-3 86.70 ( 0.00%) 86.07 ( -0.73%) >>>> Percentage huge-5 90.26 ( 0.00%) 78.02 ( -13.57%) >>>> Percentage huge-7 92.34 ( 0.00%) 78.67 ( -14.81%) >>>> Percentage huge-12 91.18 ( 0.00%) 81.04 ( -11.12%) >>>> Percentage huge-18 89.00 ( 0.00%) 79.57 ( -10.60%) >>>> Percentage huge-24 90.52 ( 0.00%) 80.07 ( -11.54%) >>>> Percentage huge-30 94.44 ( 0.00%) 96.28 ( 1.95%) >>>> Percentage huge-32 93.09 ( 0.00%) 99.39 ( 6.77%) >>>> >>>> I add below fix based on your fix 2, then the thpcompact Percentage >>>> looks good. How do you think for the fix? >>> >>> Yeah another well spotted, thanks. "slight regression" is an understatement, >>> this affects not just a "statistics" but very important counter >>> NR_FREE_PAGES which IIUC would eventually become larger than reality, make >>> the watermark checks false positive and result in depleted reserves etc etc. >>> Actually wondering why we're not seeing -next failures already (or maybe I >>> just haven't noticed). >> >> Good catch indeed. >> >> Trying to understand why I didn't notice this during testing, and I >> think it's because I had order-10 pageblocks in my config. There is >> this in compaction_capture(): >> >> if (order < pageblock_order && migratetype == MIGRATE_MOVABLE) >> return false; >> >> Most compaction is for order-9 THPs on movable blocks, so I didn't get >> much capturing in practice in order for that leak to be noticable. >> >> In earlier versions of the patches I had more aggressive capturing, >> but also did the accounting in add_page_to/del_page_from_freelist(), >> so capturing only steals what's already accounted to be off list. >> >> With the __add/__del and the consolidated account_freepages() >> optimization, compaction_capture() needs explicit accounting again. >> >>>> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c >>>> index 8330c5c2de6b..2facf844ef84 100644 >>>> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c >>>> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c >>>> @@ -805,8 +805,10 @@ static inline void __free_one_page(struct page *page, >>>> while (order < MAX_PAGE_ORDER) { >>>> int buddy_mt = migratetype; >>>> >>>> - if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) >>>> + if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) { >>>> + account_freepages(zone, -(1 << order), migratetype); >>>> return; >>>> + } >>>> >>>> buddy = find_buddy_page_pfn(page, pfn, order, &buddy_pfn); >>>> if (!buddy) >>>> >>>> With my fix, the THP percentage looks better: >>>> k6.9-rc2-base base + patch10 + 2 fixes + >>>> my fix >>>> Percentage huge-1 78.18 ( 0.00%) 82.83 ( 5.94%) >>>> Percentage huge-3 86.70 ( 0.00%) 93.47 ( 7.81%) >>>> Percentage huge-5 90.26 ( 0.00%) 94.73 ( 4.95%) >>>> Percentage huge-7 92.34 ( 0.00%) 95.22 ( 3.12%) >>>> Percentage huge-12 91.18 ( 0.00%) 92.40 ( 1.34%) >>>> Percentage huge-18 89.00 ( 0.00%) 85.39 ( -4.06%) >>>> Percentage huge-24 90.52 ( 0.00%) 94.70 ( 4.61%) >>>> Percentage huge-30 94.44 ( 0.00%) 97.00 ( 2.71%) >>>> Percentage huge-32 93.09 ( 0.00%) 92.87 ( -0.24%) >> >> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> > > Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Thanks. >> With fixed indentation: > > Maybe Baolin could resend the finalized 2 fixups in a more ready-to-pick form? Sure, I've send it out. And I see Andrew has already folded the first fix ("mm-page_alloc-fix-freelist-movement-during-block-conversion-fix") into the patch set. If a formal fix patch is needed, Andrew, please let me know.
On 4/9/24 9:56 AM, Baolin Wang wrote: > > >>> >>> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> >> >> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> > > Thanks. > >>> With fixed indentation: >> >> Maybe Baolin could resend the finalized 2 fixups in a more ready-to-pick form? > > Sure, I've send it out. Thanks. > And I see Andrew has already folded the first fix > ("mm-page_alloc-fix-freelist-movement-during-block-conversion-fix") into > the patch set. If a formal fix patch is needed, Andrew, please let me know. Oh didn't notice, in that case nothing more should be needed.
On 2024/4/8 22:23, Johannes Weiner wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 09:38:20AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >> On 4/7/24 12:19 PM, Baolin Wang wrote: >>> On 2024/3/21 02:02, Johannes Weiner wrote: >>>> >>>> + account_freepages(page, zone, 1 << order, migratetype); >>>> + >>>> while (order < MAX_PAGE_ORDER) { >>>> - if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) { >>>> - __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, -(1 << order), >>>> - migratetype); >>>> + int buddy_mt = migratetype; >>>> + >>>> + if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) >>>> return; >>>> - } >>> >>> IIUC, if the released page is captured by compaction, then the >>> statistics for free pages should be correspondingly decreased, >>> otherwise, there will be a slight regression for my thpcompact benchmark. >>> >>> thpcompact Percentage Faults Huge >>> k6.9-rc2-base base + patch10 + 2 fixes >>> Percentage huge-1 78.18 ( 0.00%) 71.92 ( -8.01%) >>> Percentage huge-3 86.70 ( 0.00%) 86.07 ( -0.73%) >>> Percentage huge-5 90.26 ( 0.00%) 78.02 ( -13.57%) >>> Percentage huge-7 92.34 ( 0.00%) 78.67 ( -14.81%) >>> Percentage huge-12 91.18 ( 0.00%) 81.04 ( -11.12%) >>> Percentage huge-18 89.00 ( 0.00%) 79.57 ( -10.60%) >>> Percentage huge-24 90.52 ( 0.00%) 80.07 ( -11.54%) >>> Percentage huge-30 94.44 ( 0.00%) 96.28 ( 1.95%) >>> Percentage huge-32 93.09 ( 0.00%) 99.39 ( 6.77%) >>> >>> I add below fix based on your fix 2, then the thpcompact Percentage >>> looks good. How do you think for the fix? >> >> Yeah another well spotted, thanks. "slight regression" is an understatement, >> this affects not just a "statistics" but very important counter >> NR_FREE_PAGES which IIUC would eventually become larger than reality, make >> the watermark checks false positive and result in depleted reserves etc etc. >> Actually wondering why we're not seeing -next failures already (or maybe I >> just haven't noticed). > > Good catch indeed. > > Trying to understand why I didn't notice this during testing, and I > think it's because I had order-10 pageblocks in my config. There is > this in compaction_capture(): > > if (order < pageblock_order && migratetype == MIGRATE_MOVABLE) > return false; > > Most compaction is for order-9 THPs on movable blocks, so I didn't get > much capturing in practice in order for that leak to be noticable. This makes me wonder why not use 'cc->migratetype' for migratetype comparison, so that low-order (like mTHP) compaction can directly get the released pages, which could avoid some compaction scans without mixing the migratetype? diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index 2facf844ef84..7a64020f8222 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -622,7 +622,7 @@ compaction_capture(struct capture_control *capc, struct page *page, * and vice-versa but no more than normal fallback logic which can * have trouble finding a high-order free page. */ - if (order < pageblock_order && migratetype == MIGRATE_MOVABLE) + if (order < pageblock_order && capc->cc->migratetype != migratetype) return false; capc->page = page;
On 9 Apr 2024, at 5:31, Baolin Wang wrote: > On 2024/4/8 22:23, Johannes Weiner wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 09:38:20AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >>> On 4/7/24 12:19 PM, Baolin Wang wrote: >>>> On 2024/3/21 02:02, Johannes Weiner wrote: >>>>> + account_freepages(page, zone, 1 << order, migratetype); >>>>> + >>>>> while (order < MAX_PAGE_ORDER) { >>>>> - if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) { >>>>> - __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, -(1 << order), >>>>> - migratetype); >>>>> + int buddy_mt = migratetype; >>>>> + >>>>> + if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) >>>>> return; >>>>> - } >>>> >>>> IIUC, if the released page is captured by compaction, then the >>>> statistics for free pages should be correspondingly decreased, >>>> otherwise, there will be a slight regression for my thpcompact benchmark. >>>> >>>> thpcompact Percentage Faults Huge >>>> k6.9-rc2-base base + patch10 + 2 fixes >>>> Percentage huge-1 78.18 ( 0.00%) 71.92 ( -8.01%) >>>> Percentage huge-3 86.70 ( 0.00%) 86.07 ( -0.73%) >>>> Percentage huge-5 90.26 ( 0.00%) 78.02 ( -13.57%) >>>> Percentage huge-7 92.34 ( 0.00%) 78.67 ( -14.81%) >>>> Percentage huge-12 91.18 ( 0.00%) 81.04 ( -11.12%) >>>> Percentage huge-18 89.00 ( 0.00%) 79.57 ( -10.60%) >>>> Percentage huge-24 90.52 ( 0.00%) 80.07 ( -11.54%) >>>> Percentage huge-30 94.44 ( 0.00%) 96.28 ( 1.95%) >>>> Percentage huge-32 93.09 ( 0.00%) 99.39 ( 6.77%) >>>> >>>> I add below fix based on your fix 2, then the thpcompact Percentage >>>> looks good. How do you think for the fix? >>> >>> Yeah another well spotted, thanks. "slight regression" is an understatement, >>> this affects not just a "statistics" but very important counter >>> NR_FREE_PAGES which IIUC would eventually become larger than reality, make >>> the watermark checks false positive and result in depleted reserves etc etc. >>> Actually wondering why we're not seeing -next failures already (or maybe I >>> just haven't noticed). >> >> Good catch indeed. >> >> Trying to understand why I didn't notice this during testing, and I >> think it's because I had order-10 pageblocks in my config. There is >> this in compaction_capture(): >> >> if (order < pageblock_order && migratetype == MIGRATE_MOVABLE) >> return false; >> >> Most compaction is for order-9 THPs on movable blocks, so I didn't get >> much capturing in practice in order for that leak to be noticable. > > This makes me wonder why not use 'cc->migratetype' for migratetype comparison, so that low-order (like mTHP) compaction can directly get the released pages, which could avoid some compaction scans without mixing the migratetype? > > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > index 2facf844ef84..7a64020f8222 100644 > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > @@ -622,7 +622,7 @@ compaction_capture(struct capture_control *capc, struct page *page, > * and vice-versa but no more than normal fallback logic which can > * have trouble finding a high-order free page. > */ > - if (order < pageblock_order && migratetype == MIGRATE_MOVABLE) > + if (order < pageblock_order && capc->cc->migratetype != migratetype) > return false; > > capc->page = page; It is worth trying, since at the original patch time mTHP was not present and not capturing any MIGRATE_MOVABLE makes sense. But with your change, the capture will lose the opportunity of letting an unmovable request use a reclaimable pageblock and vice-versa, like the comment says. Please change the comment as well and we should monitor potential unmovable and reclaimable regression. -- Best Regards, Yan, Zi
On 2024/4/9 22:46, Zi Yan wrote: > On 9 Apr 2024, at 5:31, Baolin Wang wrote: > >> On 2024/4/8 22:23, Johannes Weiner wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 09:38:20AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >>>> On 4/7/24 12:19 PM, Baolin Wang wrote: >>>>> On 2024/3/21 02:02, Johannes Weiner wrote: >>>>>> + account_freepages(page, zone, 1 << order, migratetype); >>>>>> + >>>>>> while (order < MAX_PAGE_ORDER) { >>>>>> - if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) { >>>>>> - __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, -(1 << order), >>>>>> - migratetype); >>>>>> + int buddy_mt = migratetype; >>>>>> + >>>>>> + if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) >>>>>> return; >>>>>> - } >>>>> >>>>> IIUC, if the released page is captured by compaction, then the >>>>> statistics for free pages should be correspondingly decreased, >>>>> otherwise, there will be a slight regression for my thpcompact benchmark. >>>>> >>>>> thpcompact Percentage Faults Huge >>>>> k6.9-rc2-base base + patch10 + 2 fixes >>>>> Percentage huge-1 78.18 ( 0.00%) 71.92 ( -8.01%) >>>>> Percentage huge-3 86.70 ( 0.00%) 86.07 ( -0.73%) >>>>> Percentage huge-5 90.26 ( 0.00%) 78.02 ( -13.57%) >>>>> Percentage huge-7 92.34 ( 0.00%) 78.67 ( -14.81%) >>>>> Percentage huge-12 91.18 ( 0.00%) 81.04 ( -11.12%) >>>>> Percentage huge-18 89.00 ( 0.00%) 79.57 ( -10.60%) >>>>> Percentage huge-24 90.52 ( 0.00%) 80.07 ( -11.54%) >>>>> Percentage huge-30 94.44 ( 0.00%) 96.28 ( 1.95%) >>>>> Percentage huge-32 93.09 ( 0.00%) 99.39 ( 6.77%) >>>>> >>>>> I add below fix based on your fix 2, then the thpcompact Percentage >>>>> looks good. How do you think for the fix? >>>> >>>> Yeah another well spotted, thanks. "slight regression" is an understatement, >>>> this affects not just a "statistics" but very important counter >>>> NR_FREE_PAGES which IIUC would eventually become larger than reality, make >>>> the watermark checks false positive and result in depleted reserves etc etc. >>>> Actually wondering why we're not seeing -next failures already (or maybe I >>>> just haven't noticed). >>> >>> Good catch indeed. >>> >>> Trying to understand why I didn't notice this during testing, and I >>> think it's because I had order-10 pageblocks in my config. There is >>> this in compaction_capture(): >>> >>> if (order < pageblock_order && migratetype == MIGRATE_MOVABLE) >>> return false; >>> >>> Most compaction is for order-9 THPs on movable blocks, so I didn't get >>> much capturing in practice in order for that leak to be noticable. >> >> This makes me wonder why not use 'cc->migratetype' for migratetype comparison, so that low-order (like mTHP) compaction can directly get the released pages, which could avoid some compaction scans without mixing the migratetype? >> >> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c >> index 2facf844ef84..7a64020f8222 100644 >> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c >> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c >> @@ -622,7 +622,7 @@ compaction_capture(struct capture_control *capc, struct page *page, >> * and vice-versa but no more than normal fallback logic which can >> * have trouble finding a high-order free page. >> */ >> - if (order < pageblock_order && migratetype == MIGRATE_MOVABLE) >> + if (order < pageblock_order && capc->cc->migratetype != migratetype) >> return false; >> >> capc->page = page; > > It is worth trying, since at the original patch time mTHP was not present and > not capturing any MIGRATE_MOVABLE makes sense. But with your change, the capture > will lose the opportunity of letting an unmovable request use a reclaimable > pageblock and vice-versa, like the comment says. Please change the comment > as well and we should monitor potential unmovable and reclaimable regression. Yes, but I think this case is easy to solve. Anyway let me try to do some measurement for mTHP.
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h index 8147b1302413..bd2e94391c7e 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm.h +++ b/include/linux/mm.h @@ -3781,24 +3781,22 @@ static inline bool page_is_guard(struct page *page) return PageGuard(page); } -bool __set_page_guard(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, unsigned int order, - int migratetype); +bool __set_page_guard(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, unsigned int order); static inline bool set_page_guard(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, - unsigned int order, int migratetype) + unsigned int order) { if (!debug_guardpage_enabled()) return false; - return __set_page_guard(zone, page, order, migratetype); + return __set_page_guard(zone, page, order); } -void __clear_page_guard(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, unsigned int order, - int migratetype); +void __clear_page_guard(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, unsigned int order); static inline void clear_page_guard(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, - unsigned int order, int migratetype) + unsigned int order) { if (!debug_guardpage_enabled()) return; - __clear_page_guard(zone, page, order, migratetype); + __clear_page_guard(zone, page, order); } #else /* CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC */ @@ -3808,9 +3806,9 @@ static inline unsigned int debug_guardpage_minorder(void) { return 0; } static inline bool debug_guardpage_enabled(void) { return false; } static inline bool page_is_guard(struct page *page) { return false; } static inline bool set_page_guard(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, - unsigned int order, int migratetype) { return false; } + unsigned int order) { return false; } static inline void clear_page_guard(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, - unsigned int order, int migratetype) {} + unsigned int order) {} #endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC */ #ifdef __HAVE_ARCH_GATE_AREA diff --git a/include/linux/vmstat.h b/include/linux/vmstat.h index 343906a98d6e..735eae6e272c 100644 --- a/include/linux/vmstat.h +++ b/include/linux/vmstat.h @@ -487,14 +487,6 @@ static inline void node_stat_sub_folio(struct folio *folio, mod_node_page_state(folio_pgdat(folio), item, -folio_nr_pages(folio)); } -static inline void __mod_zone_freepage_state(struct zone *zone, int nr_pages, - int migratetype) -{ - __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES, nr_pages); - if (is_migrate_cma(migratetype)) - __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES, nr_pages); -} - extern const char * const vmstat_text[]; static inline const char *zone_stat_name(enum zone_stat_item item) diff --git a/mm/debug_page_alloc.c b/mm/debug_page_alloc.c index 6755f0c9d4a3..d46acf989dde 100644 --- a/mm/debug_page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/debug_page_alloc.c @@ -32,8 +32,7 @@ static int __init debug_guardpage_minorder_setup(char *buf) } early_param("debug_guardpage_minorder", debug_guardpage_minorder_setup); -bool __set_page_guard(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, unsigned int order, - int migratetype) +bool __set_page_guard(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, unsigned int order) { if (order >= debug_guardpage_minorder()) return false; @@ -41,19 +40,12 @@ bool __set_page_guard(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, unsigned int order, __SetPageGuard(page); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&page->buddy_list); set_page_private(page, order); - /* Guard pages are not available for any usage */ - if (!is_migrate_isolate(migratetype)) - __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, -(1 << order), migratetype); return true; } -void __clear_page_guard(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, unsigned int order, - int migratetype) +void __clear_page_guard(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, unsigned int order) { __ClearPageGuard(page); - set_page_private(page, 0); - if (!is_migrate_isolate(migratetype)) - __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, (1 << order), migratetype); } diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h index d6e6c7d9f04e..0a4007b03d0d 100644 --- a/mm/internal.h +++ b/mm/internal.h @@ -1036,11 +1036,6 @@ static inline bool is_migrate_highatomic(enum migratetype migratetype) return migratetype == MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC; } -static inline bool is_migrate_highatomic_page(struct page *page) -{ - return get_pageblock_migratetype(page) == MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC; -} - void setup_zone_pageset(struct zone *zone); struct migration_target_control { diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index efb2581ac142..c46491f83ac2 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -642,42 +642,72 @@ compaction_capture(struct capture_control *capc, struct page *page, } #endif /* CONFIG_COMPACTION */ -/* Used for pages not on another list */ -static inline void add_to_free_list(struct page *page, struct zone *zone, - unsigned int order, int migratetype) +static inline void account_freepages(struct page *page, struct zone *zone, + int nr_pages, int migratetype) { - struct free_area *area = &zone->free_area[order]; + if (is_migrate_isolate(migratetype)) + return; - list_add(&page->buddy_list, &area->free_list[migratetype]); - area->nr_free++; + __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES, nr_pages); + + if (is_migrate_cma(migratetype)) + __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES, nr_pages); } /* Used for pages not on another list */ -static inline void add_to_free_list_tail(struct page *page, struct zone *zone, - unsigned int order, int migratetype) +static inline void __add_to_free_list(struct page *page, struct zone *zone, + unsigned int order, int migratetype, + bool tail) { struct free_area *area = &zone->free_area[order]; - list_add_tail(&page->buddy_list, &area->free_list[migratetype]); + VM_WARN_ONCE(get_pageblock_migratetype(page) != migratetype, + "page type is %lu, passed migratetype is %d (nr=%d)\n", + get_pageblock_migratetype(page), migratetype, 1 << order); + + if (tail) + list_add_tail(&page->buddy_list, &area->free_list[migratetype]); + else + list_add(&page->buddy_list, &area->free_list[migratetype]); area->nr_free++; } +static inline void add_to_free_list(struct page *page, struct zone *zone, + unsigned int order, int migratetype, + bool tail) +{ + __add_to_free_list(page, zone, order, migratetype, tail); + account_freepages(page, zone, 1 << order, migratetype); +} + /* * Used for pages which are on another list. Move the pages to the tail * of the list - so the moved pages won't immediately be considered for * allocation again (e.g., optimization for memory onlining). */ static inline void move_to_free_list(struct page *page, struct zone *zone, - unsigned int order, int migratetype) + unsigned int order, int old_mt, int new_mt) { struct free_area *area = &zone->free_area[order]; - list_move_tail(&page->buddy_list, &area->free_list[migratetype]); + /* Free page moving can fail, so it happens before the type update */ + VM_WARN_ONCE(get_pageblock_migratetype(page) != old_mt, + "page type is %lu, passed migratetype is %d (nr=%d)\n", + get_pageblock_migratetype(page), old_mt, 1 << order); + + list_move_tail(&page->buddy_list, &area->free_list[new_mt]); + + account_freepages(page, zone, -(1 << order), old_mt); + account_freepages(page, zone, 1 << order, new_mt); } -static inline void del_page_from_free_list(struct page *page, struct zone *zone, - unsigned int order) +static inline void __del_page_from_free_list(struct page *page, struct zone *zone, + unsigned int order, int migratetype) { + VM_WARN_ONCE(get_pageblock_migratetype(page) != migratetype, + "page type is %lu, passed migratetype is %d (nr=%d)\n", + get_pageblock_migratetype(page), migratetype, 1 << order); + /* clear reported state and update reported page count */ if (page_reported(page)) __ClearPageReported(page); @@ -688,6 +718,13 @@ static inline void del_page_from_free_list(struct page *page, struct zone *zone, zone->free_area[order].nr_free--; } +static inline void del_page_from_free_list(struct page *page, struct zone *zone, + unsigned int order, int migratetype) +{ + __del_page_from_free_list(page, zone, order, migratetype); + account_freepages(page, zone, -(1 << order), migratetype); +} + static inline struct page *get_page_from_free_area(struct free_area *area, int migratetype) { @@ -759,18 +796,16 @@ static inline void __free_one_page(struct page *page, VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page->flags & PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP, page); VM_BUG_ON(migratetype == -1); - if (likely(!is_migrate_isolate(migratetype))) - __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, 1 << order, migratetype); - VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(pfn & ((1 << order) - 1), page); VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(bad_range(zone, page), page); + account_freepages(page, zone, 1 << order, migratetype); + while (order < MAX_PAGE_ORDER) { - if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) { - __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, -(1 << order), - migratetype); + int buddy_mt = migratetype; + + if (compaction_capture(capc, page, order, migratetype)) return; - } buddy = find_buddy_page_pfn(page, pfn, order, &buddy_pfn); if (!buddy) @@ -783,19 +818,12 @@ static inline void __free_one_page(struct page *page, * pageblock isolation could cause incorrect freepage or CMA * accounting or HIGHATOMIC accounting. */ - int buddy_mt = get_pfnblock_migratetype(buddy, buddy_pfn); + buddy_mt = get_pfnblock_migratetype(buddy, buddy_pfn); - if (migratetype != buddy_mt) { - if (!migratetype_is_mergeable(migratetype) || - !migratetype_is_mergeable(buddy_mt)) - goto done_merging; - /* - * Match buddy type. This ensures that - * an expand() down the line puts the - * sub-blocks on the right freelists. - */ - set_pageblock_migratetype(buddy, migratetype); - } + if (migratetype != buddy_mt && + (!migratetype_is_mergeable(migratetype) || + !migratetype_is_mergeable(buddy_mt))) + goto done_merging; } /* @@ -803,9 +831,19 @@ static inline void __free_one_page(struct page *page, * merge with it and move up one order. */ if (page_is_guard(buddy)) - clear_page_guard(zone, buddy, order, migratetype); + clear_page_guard(zone, buddy, order); else - del_page_from_free_list(buddy, zone, order); + __del_page_from_free_list(buddy, zone, order, buddy_mt); + + if (unlikely(buddy_mt != migratetype)) { + /* + * Match buddy type. This ensures that an + * expand() down the line puts the sub-blocks + * on the right freelists. + */ + set_pageblock_migratetype(buddy, migratetype); + } + combined_pfn = buddy_pfn & pfn; page = page + (combined_pfn - pfn); pfn = combined_pfn; @@ -822,10 +860,7 @@ static inline void __free_one_page(struct page *page, else to_tail = buddy_merge_likely(pfn, buddy_pfn, page, order); - if (to_tail) - add_to_free_list_tail(page, zone, order, migratetype); - else - add_to_free_list(page, zone, order, migratetype); + __add_to_free_list(page, zone, order, migratetype, to_tail); /* Notify page reporting subsystem of freed page */ if (!(fpi_flags & FPI_SKIP_REPORT_NOTIFY)) @@ -1314,10 +1349,10 @@ static inline void expand(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, * Corresponding page table entries will not be touched, * pages will stay not present in virtual address space */ - if (set_page_guard(zone, &page[size], high, migratetype)) + if (set_page_guard(zone, &page[size], high)) continue; - add_to_free_list(&page[size], zone, high, migratetype); + add_to_free_list(&page[size], zone, high, migratetype, false); set_buddy_order(&page[size], high); } } @@ -1487,7 +1522,7 @@ struct page *__rmqueue_smallest(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order, page = get_page_from_free_area(area, migratetype); if (!page) continue; - del_page_from_free_list(page, zone, current_order); + del_page_from_free_list(page, zone, current_order, migratetype); expand(zone, page, order, current_order, migratetype); trace_mm_page_alloc_zone_locked(page, order, migratetype, pcp_allowed_order(order) && @@ -1527,7 +1562,7 @@ static inline struct page *__rmqueue_cma_fallback(struct zone *zone, * type's freelist. */ static int move_freepages(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn, - unsigned long end_pfn, int migratetype) + unsigned long end_pfn, int old_mt, int new_mt) { struct page *page; unsigned long pfn; @@ -1549,12 +1584,14 @@ static int move_freepages(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn, VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_zone(page) != zone, page); order = buddy_order(page); - move_to_free_list(page, zone, order, migratetype); + + move_to_free_list(page, zone, order, old_mt, new_mt); + pfn += 1 << order; pages_moved += 1 << order; } - set_pageblock_migratetype(pfn_to_page(start_pfn), migratetype); + set_pageblock_migratetype(pfn_to_page(start_pfn), new_mt); return pages_moved; } @@ -1612,7 +1649,7 @@ static bool prep_move_freepages_block(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, } static int move_freepages_block(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, - int migratetype) + int old_mt, int new_mt) { unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn; @@ -1620,7 +1657,7 @@ static int move_freepages_block(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, NULL, NULL)) return -1; - return move_freepages(zone, start_pfn, end_pfn, migratetype); + return move_freepages(zone, start_pfn, end_pfn, old_mt, new_mt); } #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_ISOLATION @@ -1692,7 +1729,6 @@ bool move_freepages_block_isolate(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int migratetype) { unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn, pfn; - int nr_moved, mt; if (!prep_move_freepages_block(zone, page, &start_pfn, &end_pfn, NULL, NULL)) @@ -1703,11 +1739,9 @@ bool move_freepages_block_isolate(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, if (pfn != start_pfn) { struct page *buddy = pfn_to_page(pfn); int order = buddy_order(buddy); - int mt = get_pfnblock_migratetype(buddy, pfn); - if (!is_migrate_isolate(mt)) - __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, -(1UL << order), mt); - del_page_from_free_list(buddy, zone, order); + del_page_from_free_list(buddy, zone, order, + get_pfnblock_migratetype(buddy, pfn)); set_pageblock_migratetype(page, migratetype); split_large_buddy(zone, buddy, pfn, order); return true; @@ -1715,23 +1749,17 @@ bool move_freepages_block_isolate(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, /* We're the starting block of a larger buddy */ if (PageBuddy(page) && buddy_order(page) > pageblock_order) { - int mt = get_pfnblock_migratetype(page, pfn); int order = buddy_order(page); - if (!is_migrate_isolate(mt)) - __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, -(1UL << order), mt); - del_page_from_free_list(page, zone, order); + del_page_from_free_list(page, zone, order, + get_pfnblock_migratetype(page, pfn)); set_pageblock_migratetype(page, migratetype); split_large_buddy(zone, page, pfn, order); return true; } - mt = get_pfnblock_migratetype(page, start_pfn); - nr_moved = move_freepages(zone, start_pfn, end_pfn, migratetype); - if (!is_migrate_isolate(mt)) - __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, -nr_moved, mt); - else if (!is_migrate_isolate(migratetype)) - __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, nr_moved, migratetype); + move_freepages(zone, start_pfn, end_pfn, + get_pfnblock_migratetype(page, start_pfn), migratetype); return true; } #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_ISOLATION */ @@ -1845,7 +1873,7 @@ steal_suitable_fallback(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, /* Take ownership for orders >= pageblock_order */ if (current_order >= pageblock_order) { - del_page_from_free_list(page, zone, current_order); + del_page_from_free_list(page, zone, current_order, block_type); change_pageblock_range(page, current_order, start_type); expand(zone, page, order, current_order, start_type); return page; @@ -1895,12 +1923,12 @@ steal_suitable_fallback(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, */ if (free_pages + alike_pages >= (1 << (pageblock_order-1)) || page_group_by_mobility_disabled) { - move_freepages(zone, start_pfn, end_pfn, start_type); + move_freepages(zone, start_pfn, end_pfn, block_type, start_type); return __rmqueue_smallest(zone, order, start_type); } single_page: - del_page_from_free_list(page, zone, current_order); + del_page_from_free_list(page, zone, current_order, block_type); expand(zone, page, order, current_order, block_type); return page; } @@ -1970,7 +1998,7 @@ static void reserve_highatomic_pageblock(struct page *page, struct zone *zone) mt = get_pageblock_migratetype(page); /* Only reserve normal pageblocks (i.e., they can merge with others) */ if (migratetype_is_mergeable(mt)) - if (move_freepages_block(zone, page, + if (move_freepages_block(zone, page, mt, MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC) != -1) zone->nr_reserved_highatomic += pageblock_nr_pages; @@ -2011,11 +2039,13 @@ static bool unreserve_highatomic_pageblock(const struct alloc_context *ac, spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags); for (order = 0; order < NR_PAGE_ORDERS; order++) { struct free_area *area = &(zone->free_area[order]); + int mt; page = get_page_from_free_area(area, MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC); if (!page) continue; + mt = get_pageblock_migratetype(page); /* * In page freeing path, migratetype change is racy so * we can counter several free pages in a pageblock @@ -2023,7 +2053,7 @@ static bool unreserve_highatomic_pageblock(const struct alloc_context *ac, * from highatomic to ac->migratetype. So we should * adjust the count once. */ - if (is_migrate_highatomic_page(page)) { + if (is_migrate_highatomic(mt)) { /* * It should never happen but changes to * locking could inadvertently allow a per-cpu @@ -2045,7 +2075,8 @@ static bool unreserve_highatomic_pageblock(const struct alloc_context *ac, * of pageblocks that cannot be completely freed * may increase. */ - ret = move_freepages_block(zone, page, ac->migratetype); + ret = move_freepages_block(zone, page, mt, + ac->migratetype); /* * Reserving this block already succeeded, so this should * not fail on zone boundaries. @@ -2251,12 +2282,7 @@ static int rmqueue_bulk(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order, * pages are ordered properly. */ list_add_tail(&page->pcp_list, list); - if (is_migrate_cma(get_pageblock_migratetype(page))) - __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES, - -(1 << order)); } - - __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES, -(i << order)); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock, flags); return i; @@ -2748,11 +2774,9 @@ int __isolate_free_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order) watermark = zone->_watermark[WMARK_MIN] + (1UL << order); if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, 0, watermark, 0, ALLOC_CMA)) return 0; - - __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, -(1UL << order), mt); } - del_page_from_free_list(page, zone, order); + del_page_from_free_list(page, zone, order, mt); /* * Set the pageblock if the isolated page is at least half of a @@ -2767,7 +2791,7 @@ int __isolate_free_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order) * with others) */ if (migratetype_is_mergeable(mt)) - move_freepages_block(zone, page, + move_freepages_block(zone, page, mt, MIGRATE_MOVABLE); } } @@ -2852,8 +2876,6 @@ struct page *rmqueue_buddy(struct zone *preferred_zone, struct zone *zone, return NULL; } } - __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, -(1 << order), - get_pageblock_migratetype(page)); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock, flags); } while (check_new_pages(page, order)); @@ -6737,8 +6759,9 @@ void __offline_isolated_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn) BUG_ON(page_count(page)); BUG_ON(!PageBuddy(page)); + VM_WARN_ON(get_pageblock_migratetype(page) != MIGRATE_ISOLATE); order = buddy_order(page); - del_page_from_free_list(page, zone, order); + del_page_from_free_list(page, zone, order, MIGRATE_ISOLATE); pfn += (1 << order); } spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock, flags); @@ -6788,10 +6811,10 @@ static void break_down_buddy_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, current_buddy = page + size; } - if (set_page_guard(zone, current_buddy, high, migratetype)) + if (set_page_guard(zone, current_buddy, high)) continue; - add_to_free_list(current_buddy, zone, high, migratetype); + add_to_free_list(current_buddy, zone, high, migratetype, false); set_buddy_order(current_buddy, high); } } @@ -6817,12 +6840,11 @@ bool take_page_off_buddy(struct page *page) int migratetype = get_pfnblock_migratetype(page_head, pfn_head); - del_page_from_free_list(page_head, zone, page_order); + del_page_from_free_list(page_head, zone, page_order, + migratetype); break_down_buddy_pages(zone, page_head, page, 0, page_order, migratetype); SetPageHWPoisonTakenOff(page); - if (!is_migrate_isolate(migratetype)) - __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, -1, migratetype); ret = true; break; } @@ -6930,7 +6952,7 @@ static bool try_to_accept_memory_one(struct zone *zone) list_del(&page->lru); last = list_empty(&zone->unaccepted_pages); - __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, -MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES, MIGRATE_MOVABLE); + account_freepages(page, zone, -MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES, MIGRATE_MOVABLE); __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_UNACCEPTED, -MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock, flags); @@ -6982,7 +7004,7 @@ static bool __free_unaccepted(struct page *page) spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags); first = list_empty(&zone->unaccepted_pages); list_add_tail(&page->lru, &zone->unaccepted_pages); - __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES, MIGRATE_MOVABLE); + account_freepages(page, zone, MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES, MIGRATE_MOVABLE); __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_UNACCEPTED, MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock, flags); diff --git a/mm/page_isolation.c b/mm/page_isolation.c index 042937d5abe4..914a71c580d8 100644 --- a/mm/page_isolation.c +++ b/mm/page_isolation.c @@ -252,7 +252,8 @@ static void unset_migratetype_isolate(struct page *page, int migratetype) * Isolating this block already succeeded, so this * should not fail on zone boundaries. */ - WARN_ON_ONCE(!move_freepages_block_isolate(zone, page, migratetype)); + WARN_ON_ONCE(!move_freepages_block_isolate(zone, page, + migratetype)); } else { set_pageblock_migratetype(page, migratetype); __putback_isolated_page(page, order, migratetype);
Free page accounting currently happens a bit too high up the call stack, where it has to deal with guard pages, compaction capturing, block stealing and even page isolation. This is subtle and fragile, and makes it difficult to hack on the code. Now that type violations on the freelists have been fixed, push the accounting down to where pages enter and leave the freelist. Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> --- include/linux/mm.h | 18 ++-- include/linux/vmstat.h | 8 -- mm/debug_page_alloc.c | 12 +-- mm/internal.h | 5 -- mm/page_alloc.c | 194 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ mm/page_isolation.c | 3 +- 6 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 120 deletions(-)