Message ID | 20240401030052.2887845-6-tzungbi@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | provide ID table for avoiding fallback match | expand |
On 01/04/2024 05:00, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote: > Prepare to provide platform_device_id table. Shrink the driver name for > fitting to [1]. Instead of linking to external resources, please describe the problem and the bug you are fixing here. > > [1]: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/source/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h#L608 > > Reviewed-by: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org> > Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org> Missing fixes tag and Cc-stable. Best regards, Krzysztof
On 01/04/2024 12:02, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 01/04/2024 05:00, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote: >> Prepare to provide platform_device_id table. Shrink the driver name for >> fitting to [1]. > > Instead of linking to external resources, please describe the problem > and the bug you are fixing here. > >> >> [1]: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/source/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h#L608 >> >> Reviewed-by: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org> >> Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org> > > Missing fixes tag and Cc-stable. Ah, now I read your answer to v1 discussion. So this was not a bug in the first place? Hm, then probably my comment was not really correct and we should not split it. Best regards, Krzysztof
On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 12:19:16PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 01/04/2024 12:02, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 01/04/2024 05:00, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote: > >> Prepare to provide platform_device_id table. Shrink the driver name for > >> fitting to [1]. > > > > Instead of linking to external resources, please describe the problem > > and the bug you are fixing here. > > > >> > >> [1]: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/source/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h#L608 > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org> > >> Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org> > > > > Missing fixes tag and Cc-stable. > > Ah, now I read your answer to v1 discussion. So this was not a bug in > the first place? Hm, then probably my comment was not really correct and > we should not split it. Correct, this wasn't a bug in the first place. Only if moving the string into struct platform_device_id, the compiler emits errors about the oversize. I'm fine with both versions. But let's go back to adopt v1 (no split) if no strong objections. Thanks a lot for your review again.
diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_kbd_led_backlight.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_kbd_led_backlight.c index 793fd3f1015d..814846a66e95 100644 --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_kbd_led_backlight.c +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_kbd_led_backlight.c @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, keyboard_led_of_match); static struct platform_driver keyboard_led_driver = { .driver = { - .name = "chromeos-keyboard-leds", + .name = "cros-keyboard-leds", .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(keyboard_led_acpi_match), .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(keyboard_led_of_match), }, @@ -260,4 +260,4 @@ module_platform_driver(keyboard_led_driver); MODULE_AUTHOR("Simon Que <sque@chromium.org>"); MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ChromeOS Keyboard backlight LED Driver"); MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); -MODULE_ALIAS("platform:chromeos-keyboard-leds"); +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:cros-keyboard-leds");