Message ID | 20240409031549.3531084-1-kuba@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | selftests: move bpf-offload test from bpf to net | expand |
On 04/08, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > The test_offload.py test fits in networking and bpf equally > well. We started adding more Python tests in networking > and some of the code in test_offload.py can be reused, > so move it to networking. Looks like it bit rotted over > time and some fixes are needed. > > Admittedly more code could be extracted but I only had > the time for a minor cleanup :( Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Far too often I've seen this test broken because it's not in the CI :-( Hope you can put it in the netdev one so we get a better signal.
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 09:10:04 -0700 Stanislav Fomichev wrote: > Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Thanks! > Far too often I've seen this test broken because it's not in the CI :-( > Hope you can put it in the netdev one so we get a better signal. We use kselftest infra directly, so they got auto-included. But I gotta investigate what's going on on the runner because it seems to be failing right now: https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/contest.html?test=bpf-offload-py
On 4/8/24 8:15 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > The test_offload.py test fits in networking and bpf equally > well. We started adding more Python tests in networking > and some of the code in test_offload.py can be reused, > so move it to networking. Looks like it bit rotted over > time and some fixes are needed. Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 09:19:08 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > Far too often I've seen this test broken because it's not in the CI :-( > > Hope you can put it in the netdev one so we get a better signal. > > We use kselftest infra directly, so they got auto-included. > But I gotta investigate what's going on on the runner because > it seems to be failing right now: > https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/contest.html?test=bpf-offload-py FWIW looks like iproute2 on the worker was built without libbpf support. Fixed now, let's see if it turns green :)
Hello: This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main) by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>: On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 20:15:45 -0700 you wrote: > The test_offload.py test fits in networking and bpf equally > well. We started adding more Python tests in networking > and some of the code in test_offload.py can be reused, > so move it to networking. Looks like it bit rotted over > time and some fixes are needed. > > Admittedly more code could be extracted but I only had > the time for a minor cleanup :( > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [net-next,1/4] selftests: move bpf-offload test from bpf to net https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/e59f0e93e92e - [net-next,2/4] selftests: net: bpf_offload: wait for maps https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/fc50c698c28b - [net-next,3/4] selftests: net: declare section names for bpf_offload https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/b1c2ce11d428 - [net-next,4/4] selftests: net: reuse common code in bpf_offload https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/6ce2b689932b You are awesome, thank you!