Message ID | 20240404143308.2224141-2-ryan.roberts@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Speed up boot with faster linear map creation | expand |
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 03:33:05PM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote: > A large part of the kernel boot time is creating the kernel linear map > page tables. When rodata=full, all memory is mapped by pte. And when > there is lots of physical ram, there are lots of pte tables to populate. > The primary cost associated with this is mapping and unmapping the pte > table memory in the fixmap; at unmap time, the TLB entry must be > invalidated and this is expensive. > > Previously, each pmd and pte table was fixmapped/fixunmapped for each > cont(pte|pmd) block of mappings (16 entries with 4K granule). This means > we ended up issuing 32 TLBIs per (pmd|pte) table during the population > phase. > > Let's fix that, and fixmap/fixunmap each page once per population, for a > saving of 31 TLBIs per (pmd|pte) table. This gives a significant boot > speedup. > > Execution time of map_mem(), which creates the kernel linear map page > tables, was measured on different machines with different RAM configs: > > | Apple M2 VM | Ampere Altra| Ampere Altra| Ampere Altra > | VM, 16G | VM, 64G | VM, 256G | Metal, 512G > ---------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|------------- > | ms (%) | ms (%) | ms (%) | ms (%) > ---------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|------------- > before | 153 (0%) | 2227 (0%) | 8798 (0%) | 17442 (0%) > after | 77 (-49%) | 431 (-81%) | 1727 (-80%) | 3796 (-78%) > > Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com> > Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitayama@fujitsu.com> > Tested-by: Eric Chanudet <echanude@redhat.com> > --- > arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++-------------- > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c > index 495b732d5af3..fd91b5bdb514 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c > @@ -172,12 +172,9 @@ bool pgattr_change_is_safe(u64 old, u64 new) > return ((old ^ new) & ~mask) == 0; > } > > -static void init_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, > - phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot) > +static pte_t *init_pte(pte_t *ptep, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, > + phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot) > { > - pte_t *ptep; > - > - ptep = pte_set_fixmap_offset(pmdp, addr); > do { > pte_t old_pte = __ptep_get(ptep); > > @@ -193,7 +190,7 @@ static void init_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, > phys += PAGE_SIZE; > } while (ptep++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != end); > > - pte_clear_fixmap(); > + return ptep; > } > > static void alloc_init_cont_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, > @@ -204,6 +201,7 @@ static void alloc_init_cont_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, > { > unsigned long next; > pmd_t pmd = READ_ONCE(*pmdp); > + pte_t *ptep; > > BUG_ON(pmd_sect(pmd)); > if (pmd_none(pmd)) { > @@ -219,6 +217,7 @@ static void alloc_init_cont_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, > } > BUG_ON(pmd_bad(pmd)); > > + ptep = pte_set_fixmap_offset(pmdp, addr); > do { > pgprot_t __prot = prot; > > @@ -229,20 +228,20 @@ static void alloc_init_cont_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, > (flags & NO_CONT_MAPPINGS) == 0) > __prot = __pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) | PTE_CONT); > > - init_pte(pmdp, addr, next, phys, __prot); > + ptep = init_pte(ptep, addr, next, phys, __prot); > > phys += next - addr; > } while (addr = next, addr != end); I reckon it might be better to leave init_pte() returning void, and move the ptep along here, e.g. ptep = pte_set_fixmap_offset(pmdp, addr); do { ... init_pte(ptep, addr, next, phys, __prot); ptep += pte_index(next) - pte_index(addr); phys += next - addr; } while (addr = next, addr != end); ... as that keeps the relationship between 'ptep' and 'phys' clear since they're manipulated in the same way, adjacent to one another. Regardless this looks good, so with that change or as-is: Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> ... though I would prefer with that change. ;) Mark.
On 10/04/2024 10:46, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 03:33:05PM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote: >> A large part of the kernel boot time is creating the kernel linear map >> page tables. When rodata=full, all memory is mapped by pte. And when >> there is lots of physical ram, there are lots of pte tables to populate. >> The primary cost associated with this is mapping and unmapping the pte >> table memory in the fixmap; at unmap time, the TLB entry must be >> invalidated and this is expensive. >> >> Previously, each pmd and pte table was fixmapped/fixunmapped for each >> cont(pte|pmd) block of mappings (16 entries with 4K granule). This means >> we ended up issuing 32 TLBIs per (pmd|pte) table during the population >> phase. >> >> Let's fix that, and fixmap/fixunmap each page once per population, for a >> saving of 31 TLBIs per (pmd|pte) table. This gives a significant boot >> speedup. >> >> Execution time of map_mem(), which creates the kernel linear map page >> tables, was measured on different machines with different RAM configs: >> >> | Apple M2 VM | Ampere Altra| Ampere Altra| Ampere Altra >> | VM, 16G | VM, 64G | VM, 256G | Metal, 512G >> ---------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|------------- >> | ms (%) | ms (%) | ms (%) | ms (%) >> ---------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|------------- >> before | 153 (0%) | 2227 (0%) | 8798 (0%) | 17442 (0%) >> after | 77 (-49%) | 431 (-81%) | 1727 (-80%) | 3796 (-78%) >> >> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com> >> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitayama@fujitsu.com> >> Tested-by: Eric Chanudet <echanude@redhat.com> >> --- >> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++-------------- >> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c >> index 495b732d5af3..fd91b5bdb514 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c >> @@ -172,12 +172,9 @@ bool pgattr_change_is_safe(u64 old, u64 new) >> return ((old ^ new) & ~mask) == 0; >> } >> >> -static void init_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, >> - phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot) >> +static pte_t *init_pte(pte_t *ptep, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, >> + phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot) >> { >> - pte_t *ptep; >> - >> - ptep = pte_set_fixmap_offset(pmdp, addr); >> do { >> pte_t old_pte = __ptep_get(ptep); >> >> @@ -193,7 +190,7 @@ static void init_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, >> phys += PAGE_SIZE; >> } while (ptep++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != end); >> >> - pte_clear_fixmap(); >> + return ptep; >> } >> >> static void alloc_init_cont_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, >> @@ -204,6 +201,7 @@ static void alloc_init_cont_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, >> { >> unsigned long next; >> pmd_t pmd = READ_ONCE(*pmdp); >> + pte_t *ptep; >> >> BUG_ON(pmd_sect(pmd)); >> if (pmd_none(pmd)) { >> @@ -219,6 +217,7 @@ static void alloc_init_cont_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, >> } >> BUG_ON(pmd_bad(pmd)); >> >> + ptep = pte_set_fixmap_offset(pmdp, addr); >> do { >> pgprot_t __prot = prot; >> >> @@ -229,20 +228,20 @@ static void alloc_init_cont_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, >> (flags & NO_CONT_MAPPINGS) == 0) >> __prot = __pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) | PTE_CONT); >> >> - init_pte(pmdp, addr, next, phys, __prot); >> + ptep = init_pte(ptep, addr, next, phys, __prot); >> >> phys += next - addr; >> } while (addr = next, addr != end); > > I reckon it might be better to leave init_pte() returning void, and move the > ptep along here, e.g. > > ptep = pte_set_fixmap_offset(pmdp, addr); > do { > ... > > init_pte(ptep, addr, next, phys, __prot); > > ptep += pte_index(next) - pte_index(addr); > phys += next - addr; > } while (addr = next, addr != end); > > > ... as that keeps the relationship between 'ptep' and 'phys' clear since > they're manipulated in the same way, adjacent to one another. > > Regardless this looks good, so with that change or as-is: > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> > > ... though I would prefer with that change. ;) Yep, will change. And I'll do the same for pmd_init() too. > > Mark.
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c index 495b732d5af3..fd91b5bdb514 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c @@ -172,12 +172,9 @@ bool pgattr_change_is_safe(u64 old, u64 new) return ((old ^ new) & ~mask) == 0; } -static void init_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, - phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot) +static pte_t *init_pte(pte_t *ptep, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, + phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot) { - pte_t *ptep; - - ptep = pte_set_fixmap_offset(pmdp, addr); do { pte_t old_pte = __ptep_get(ptep); @@ -193,7 +190,7 @@ static void init_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, phys += PAGE_SIZE; } while (ptep++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != end); - pte_clear_fixmap(); + return ptep; } static void alloc_init_cont_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, @@ -204,6 +201,7 @@ static void alloc_init_cont_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, { unsigned long next; pmd_t pmd = READ_ONCE(*pmdp); + pte_t *ptep; BUG_ON(pmd_sect(pmd)); if (pmd_none(pmd)) { @@ -219,6 +217,7 @@ static void alloc_init_cont_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, } BUG_ON(pmd_bad(pmd)); + ptep = pte_set_fixmap_offset(pmdp, addr); do { pgprot_t __prot = prot; @@ -229,20 +228,20 @@ static void alloc_init_cont_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, (flags & NO_CONT_MAPPINGS) == 0) __prot = __pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) | PTE_CONT); - init_pte(pmdp, addr, next, phys, __prot); + ptep = init_pte(ptep, addr, next, phys, __prot); phys += next - addr; } while (addr = next, addr != end); + + pte_clear_fixmap(); } -static void init_pmd(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, - phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot, - phys_addr_t (*pgtable_alloc)(int), int flags) +static pmd_t *init_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, + phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot, + phys_addr_t (*pgtable_alloc)(int), int flags) { unsigned long next; - pmd_t *pmdp; - pmdp = pmd_set_fixmap_offset(pudp, addr); do { pmd_t old_pmd = READ_ONCE(*pmdp); @@ -269,7 +268,7 @@ static void init_pmd(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, phys += next - addr; } while (pmdp++, addr = next, addr != end); - pmd_clear_fixmap(); + return pmdp; } static void alloc_init_cont_pmd(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long addr, @@ -279,6 +278,7 @@ static void alloc_init_cont_pmd(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long addr, { unsigned long next; pud_t pud = READ_ONCE(*pudp); + pmd_t *pmdp; /* * Check for initial section mappings in the pgd/pud. @@ -297,6 +297,7 @@ static void alloc_init_cont_pmd(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long addr, } BUG_ON(pud_bad(pud)); + pmdp = pmd_set_fixmap_offset(pudp, addr); do { pgprot_t __prot = prot; @@ -307,10 +308,13 @@ static void alloc_init_cont_pmd(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long addr, (flags & NO_CONT_MAPPINGS) == 0) __prot = __pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) | PTE_CONT); - init_pmd(pudp, addr, next, phys, __prot, pgtable_alloc, flags); + pmdp = init_pmd(pmdp, addr, next, phys, __prot, pgtable_alloc, + flags); phys += next - addr; } while (addr = next, addr != end); + + pmd_clear_fixmap(); } static void alloc_init_pud(p4d_t *p4dp, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,