| Message ID | 20240408212810.1043272-1-enrico.bravi@polito.it (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v6] ima: add crypto agility support for template-hash algorithm | expand |
Hi Enrico, On Mon, 2024-04-08 at 23:28 +0200, Enrico Bravi wrote: > The template hash showed by the ascii_runtime_measurements and > binary_runtime_measurements is the one calculated using sha1 and there is > no possibility to change this value, despite the fact that the template > hash is calculated using the hash algorithms corresponding to all the PCR > banks configured in the TPM. > > Add the support to retrieve the ima log with the template data hash > calculated with a specific hash algorithm. > Add a new file in the securityfs ima directory for each hash algo > configured in a PCR bank of the TPM. Each new file has the name with > the following structure: > > {binary, ascii}_runtime_measurements_<hash_algo_name> > > Legacy files are kept, to avoid breaking existing applications, but as > symbolic links which point to {binary, ascii}_runtime_measurements_sha1 > files. These two files are created even if a TPM chip is not detected or > the sha1 bank is not configured in the TPM. > > As example, in the case a TPM chip is present and sha256 is the only > configured PCR bank, the listing of the securityfs ima directory is the > following: > > lr--r--r-- [...] ascii_runtime_measurements -> ascii_runtime_measurements_sha1 > -r--r----- [...] ascii_runtime_measurements_sha1 > -r--r----- [...] ascii_runtime_measurements_sha256 > lr--r--r-- [...] binary_runtime_measurements -> > binary_runtime_measurements_sha1 > -r--r----- [...] binary_runtime_measurements_sha1 > -r--r----- [...] binary_runtime_measurements_sha256 > --w------- [...] policy > -r--r----- [...] runtime_measurements_count > -r--r----- [...] violations > > Signed-off-by: Enrico Bravi <enrico.bravi@polito.it> > Signed-off-by: Silvia Sisinni <silvia.sisinni@polito.it> > Reviewed-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com> Much better. Just a few comments inline. > > --- > > v6: > - Fixed format error when applying the patch. > > v5: > - Added lookup_algo_by_dentry() function to select the hash algo during > measurements dump. (suggested by Roberto) > - Renamed remove_measurements_list_files() to > remove_securityfs_measurement_lists() and create_measurements_list_files() > to create_securityfs_measurement_lists(), and marked both as __init. > (suggested by Mimi) > - Renamed ima_ascii_measurements_files to ascii_securityfs_measurement_lists, > ima_binary_measurements_files to binary_securityfs_measurement_lists and > ima_measurements_files_count to securityfs_measurement_list_count, and > marked them as __ro_after_init. (suggested by Mimi) > - Added missing NULL assignment for file.file in ima_dump_measurement_list() > during kexec. > > v4: > - Added NULL check on m->file for measurements list dump called by > ima_dump_measurement_list() on kexec. > - Exported ima_algo_array and struct ima_algo_desc declaration from > ima_crypto.c to access this information in ima_fs.c. > - Added ima_measurements_files_count global variable to avoid extra > logic each time the number of measurements file is needed. > > v3: > - Added create_measurements_list_files function for measurements files > creation. > - Parameterized the remove_measurements_list_files function and add NULL > check before freeing files' list. > - Removed algorithm selection based on file name during ima_measurements_show > and ima_ascii_measurements_show, and selecting it comparing dentry address. > - Allocate also sha1 file following the schema > {binary, ascii}_runtime_measurements_<hash_algo_name> and keep legacy > files as symbolic links to those files. > - Allocate measurements files lists even if a TPM chip is not detected, > adding only sha1 files. > > v2: > - Changed the behavior of configuring at boot time the template data hash > algorithm. > - Removed template data hash algo name prefix. > - Removed ima_template_hash command line option. > - Introducing a new file in the securityfs ima subdir for each PCR banks > algorithm configured in the TPM. > (suggested by Roberto) > > security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 10 +++ > security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c | 7 +- > security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c | 1 + > 4 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h > index 11d7c0332207..72ac73ebc83e 100644 > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h > @@ -54,6 +54,16 @@ extern int ima_hash_algo __ro_after_init; > extern int ima_sha1_idx __ro_after_init; > extern int ima_hash_algo_idx __ro_after_init; > extern int ima_extra_slots __ro_after_init; > + > +/* IMA hash algorithm description */ > +struct ima_algo_desc { > + struct crypto_shash *tfm; > + enum hash_algo algo; > +}; > + > +/* hash algorithms configured in IMA */ > +extern struct ima_algo_desc *ima_algo_array; > + > extern int ima_appraise; > extern struct tpm_chip *ima_tpm_chip; > extern const char boot_aggregate_name[]; > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c > b/security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c > index f3738b2c8bcd..3606931fc525 100644 > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c > @@ -57,11 +57,6 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(ahash_bufsize, "Maximum ahash buffer > size"); > static struct crypto_shash *ima_shash_tfm; > static struct crypto_ahash *ima_ahash_tfm; > > -struct ima_algo_desc { > - struct crypto_shash *tfm; > - enum hash_algo algo; > -}; > - > int ima_sha1_idx __ro_after_init; > int ima_hash_algo_idx __ro_after_init; > /* > @@ -70,7 +65,7 @@ int ima_hash_algo_idx __ro_after_init; > */ > int ima_extra_slots __ro_after_init; > > -static struct ima_algo_desc *ima_algo_array; > +struct ima_algo_desc *ima_algo_array; ima_algo_array should probably be defined as __ro_after_init, especially now that the scope is changing. > > static int __init ima_init_ima_crypto(void) > { > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c > index cd1683dad3bf..7d9c2ef5b86c 100644 > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c > @@ -116,9 +116,30 @@ void ima_putc(struct seq_file *m, void *data, int > datalen) > seq_putc(m, *(char *)data++); > } > > +static struct dentry **ascii_securityfs_measurement_lists __ro_after_init; > +static struct dentry **binary_securityfs_measurement_lists __ro_after_init; > +static int securityfs_measurement_list_count __ro_after_init; > + > +static void lookup_algo_by_dentry(int *algo_idx, enum hash_algo *algo, > + struct seq_file *m, struct dentry > **dentry_list) Please rename the function without "_by_dentry". Consider naming the function lookup_measurement_list_algo(). Instead of dentry_list, consider naming the variable measurement_lists or just lists. > +{ > + struct dentry *dentry; > + int i; > + > + dentry = file_dentry(m->file); > + > + for (i = 0; i < securityfs_measurement_list_count; i++) { > + if (dentry == dentry_list[i]) { > + *algo_idx = i; > + *algo = ima_algo_array[i].algo; > + break; > + } > + } > +} > + > /* print format: > * 32bit-le=pcr# > - * char[20]=template digest > + * char[n]=template digest > * 32bit-le=template name size > * char[n]=template name > * [eventdata length] > @@ -132,7 +153,15 @@ int ima_measurements_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) > char *template_name; > u32 pcr, namelen, template_data_len; /* temporary fields */ > bool is_ima_template = false; > - int i; > + int i, algo_idx; > + enum hash_algo algo; > + > + algo_idx = ima_sha1_idx; > + algo = HASH_ALGO_SHA1; > + > + if (m->file != NULL) > + lookup_algo_by_dentry(&algo_idx, &algo, m, > + binary_securityfs_measurement_lists); > > /* get entry */ > e = qe->entry; > @@ -151,7 +180,7 @@ int ima_measurements_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) > ima_putc(m, &pcr, sizeof(e->pcr)); > > /* 2nd: template digest */ > - ima_putc(m, e->digests[ima_sha1_idx].digest, TPM_DIGEST_SIZE); > + ima_putc(m, e->digests[algo_idx].digest, hash_digest_size[algo]); > > /* 3rd: template name size */ > namelen = !ima_canonical_fmt ? strlen(template_name) : > @@ -220,7 +249,15 @@ static int ima_ascii_measurements_show(struct seq_file > *m, void *v) > struct ima_queue_entry *qe = v; > struct ima_template_entry *e; > char *template_name; > - int i; > + int i, algo_idx; > + enum hash_algo algo; The preferred variable definition ordering is reverse fir tree. Reverse the two lines. > + algo_idx = ima_sha1_idx; > + algo = HASH_ALGO_SHA1; > + > + if (m->file != NULL) > + lookup_algo_by_dentry(&algo_idx, &algo, m, > + ascii_securityfs_measurement_lists); > > /* get entry */ > e = qe->entry; > @@ -233,8 +270,8 @@ static int ima_ascii_measurements_show(struct seq_file *m, > void *v) > /* 1st: PCR used (config option) */ > seq_printf(m, "%2d ", e->pcr); > > - /* 2nd: SHA1 template hash */ > - ima_print_digest(m, e->digests[ima_sha1_idx].digest, TPM_DIGEST_SIZE); > + /* 2nd: template hash */ > + ima_print_digest(m, e->digests[algo_idx].digest, > hash_digest_size[algo]); > > /* 3th: template name */ > seq_printf(m, " %s", template_name); > @@ -379,6 +416,69 @@ static const struct seq_operations ima_policy_seqops = { > }; > #endif > > +static void __init remove_securityfs_measurement_lists(struct dentry > **dentry_list) > +{ > + int i; > + > + if (dentry_list) { > + for (i = 0; i < securityfs_measurement_list_count; i++) > + securityfs_remove(dentry_list[i]); > + > + kfree(dentry_list); > + } > + > + securityfs_measurement_list_count = 0; > +} > + > +static int __init create_securityfs_measurement_lists(void) > +{ > + int i; > + u16 algo; > + char file_name[NAME_MAX + 1]; > + struct dentry *dentry; > + > + securityfs_measurement_list_count = NR_BANKS(ima_tpm_chip); > + > + if (ima_sha1_idx >= NR_BANKS(ima_tpm_chip)) > + securityfs_measurement_list_count++; > + > + ascii_securityfs_measurement_lists = > kcalloc(securityfs_measurement_list_count, > + sizeof(struct dentry *), > GFP_KERNEL); Although lines > 80 characters are permitted, it isn't needed here. Like the original ascii_runtime_measurements initialization, split the line after the ascii_securityfs_measurement_lists variable name. > + if (!ascii_securityfs_measurement_lists) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + binary_securityfs_measurement_lists = > kcalloc(securityfs_measurement_list_count, > + sizeof(struct dentry *), > GFP_KERNEL); Same here. > + if (!binary_securityfs_measurement_lists) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + for (i = 0; i < securityfs_measurement_list_count; i++) { > + algo = ima_algo_array[i].algo; > + > + sprintf(file_name, "ascii_runtime_measurements_%s", > + hash_algo_name[algo]); > + dentry = securityfs_create_file(file_name, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP, > + ima_dir, NULL, > + &ima_ascii_measurements_ops); > + if (IS_ERR(dentry)) > + return PTR_ERR(dentry); > + > + ascii_securityfs_measurement_lists[i] = dentry; > + > + sprintf(file_name, "binary_runtime_measurements_%s", > + hash_algo_name[algo]); > + dentry = securityfs_create_file(file_name, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP, > + ima_dir, NULL, > + &ima_measurements_ops); > + if (IS_ERR(dentry)) > + return PTR_ERR(dentry); > + > + binary_securityfs_measurement_lists[i] = dentry; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > /* > * ima_open_policy: sequentialize access to the policy file > */ > @@ -454,6 +554,9 @@ int __init ima_fs_init(void) > { > int ret; > > + ascii_securityfs_measurement_lists = NULL; > + binary_securityfs_measurement_lists = NULL; > + > ima_dir = securityfs_create_dir("ima", integrity_dir); > if (IS_ERR(ima_dir)) > return PTR_ERR(ima_dir); > @@ -465,19 +568,21 @@ int __init ima_fs_init(void) > goto out; > } > > + ret = create_securityfs_measurement_lists(); > + if (ret != 0) > + goto out; > + > binary_runtime_measurements = > - securityfs_create_file("binary_runtime_measurements", > - S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP, ima_dir, NULL, > - &ima_measurements_ops); > + securityfs_create_symlink("binary_runtime_measurements", > ima_dir, > + "binary_runtime_measurements_sha1", > NULL); > 80 characters here and in a few other places. thanks, Mimi > if (IS_ERR(binary_runtime_measurements)) { > ret = PTR_ERR(binary_runtime_measurements); > goto out; > } > > ascii_runtime_measurements = > - securityfs_create_file("ascii_runtime_measurements", > - S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP, ima_dir, NULL, > - &ima_ascii_measurements_ops); > + securityfs_create_symlink("ascii_runtime_measurements", ima_dir, > + "ascii_runtime_measurements_sha1", > NULL); > if (IS_ERR(ascii_runtime_measurements)) { > ret = PTR_ERR(ascii_runtime_measurements); > goto out; > @@ -515,6 +620,8 @@ int __init ima_fs_init(void) > securityfs_remove(runtime_measurements_count); > securityfs_remove(ascii_runtime_measurements); > securityfs_remove(binary_runtime_measurements); > + remove_securityfs_measurement_lists(ascii_securityfs_measurement_lists); > + remove_securityfs_measurement_lists(binary_securityfs_measurement_lists) > ; > securityfs_remove(ima_symlink); > securityfs_remove(ima_dir); > > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c > b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c > index dadc1d138118..52e00332defe 100644 > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ static int ima_dump_measurement_list(unsigned long > *buffer_size, void **buffer, > goto out; > } > > + file.file = NULL; > file.size = segment_size; > file.read_pos = 0; > file.count = sizeof(khdr); /* reserved space */ > > base-commit: 38aa3f5ac6d2de6b471ecb6e1cd878957ae7e8de
On 09/04/24 14:43, Mimi Zohar wrote: > Hi Enrico, > > On Mon, 2024-04-08 at 23:28 +0200, Enrico Bravi wrote: >> The template hash showed by the ascii_runtime_measurements and >> binary_runtime_measurements is the one calculated using sha1 and there is >> no possibility to change this value, despite the fact that the template >> hash is calculated using the hash algorithms corresponding to all the PCR >> banks configured in the TPM. >> >> Add the support to retrieve the ima log with the template data hash >> calculated with a specific hash algorithm. >> Add a new file in the securityfs ima directory for each hash algo >> configured in a PCR bank of the TPM. Each new file has the name with >> the following structure: >> >> {binary, ascii}_runtime_measurements_<hash_algo_name> >> >> Legacy files are kept, to avoid breaking existing applications, but as >> symbolic links which point to {binary, ascii}_runtime_measurements_sha1 >> files. These two files are created even if a TPM chip is not detected or >> the sha1 bank is not configured in the TPM. >> >> As example, in the case a TPM chip is present and sha256 is the only >> configured PCR bank, the listing of the securityfs ima directory is the >> following: >> >> lr--r--r-- [...] ascii_runtime_measurements -> ascii_runtime_measurements_sha1 >> -r--r----- [...] ascii_runtime_measurements_sha1 >> -r--r----- [...] ascii_runtime_measurements_sha256 >> lr--r--r-- [...] binary_runtime_measurements -> >> binary_runtime_measurements_sha1 >> -r--r----- [...] binary_runtime_measurements_sha1 >> -r--r----- [...] binary_runtime_measurements_sha256 >> --w------- [...] policy >> -r--r----- [...] runtime_measurements_count >> -r--r----- [...] violations >> >> Signed-off-by: Enrico Bravi <enrico.bravi@polito.it> >> Signed-off-by: Silvia Sisinni <silvia.sisinni@polito.it> >> Reviewed-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com> > > Much better. Just a few comments inline. > >> >> --- >> >> v6: >> - Fixed format error when applying the patch. >> >> v5: >> - Added lookup_algo_by_dentry() function to select the hash algo during >> measurements dump. (suggested by Roberto) >> - Renamed remove_measurements_list_files() to >> remove_securityfs_measurement_lists() and create_measurements_list_files() >> to create_securityfs_measurement_lists(), and marked both as __init. >> (suggested by Mimi) >> - Renamed ima_ascii_measurements_files to ascii_securityfs_measurement_lists, >> ima_binary_measurements_files to binary_securityfs_measurement_lists and >> ima_measurements_files_count to securityfs_measurement_list_count, and >> marked them as __ro_after_init. (suggested by Mimi) >> - Added missing NULL assignment for file.file in ima_dump_measurement_list() >> during kexec. >> >> v4: >> - Added NULL check on m->file for measurements list dump called by >> ima_dump_measurement_list() on kexec. >> - Exported ima_algo_array and struct ima_algo_desc declaration from >> ima_crypto.c to access this information in ima_fs.c. >> - Added ima_measurements_files_count global variable to avoid extra >> logic each time the number of measurements file is needed. >> >> v3: >> - Added create_measurements_list_files function for measurements files >> creation. >> - Parameterized the remove_measurements_list_files function and add NULL >> check before freeing files' list. >> - Removed algorithm selection based on file name during ima_measurements_show >> and ima_ascii_measurements_show, and selecting it comparing dentry address. >> - Allocate also sha1 file following the schema >> {binary, ascii}_runtime_measurements_<hash_algo_name> and keep legacy >> files as symbolic links to those files. >> - Allocate measurements files lists even if a TPM chip is not detected, >> adding only sha1 files. >> >> v2: >> - Changed the behavior of configuring at boot time the template data hash >> algorithm. >> - Removed template data hash algo name prefix. >> - Removed ima_template_hash command line option. >> - Introducing a new file in the securityfs ima subdir for each PCR banks >> algorithm configured in the TPM. >> (suggested by Roberto) >> >> security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 10 +++ >> security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c | 7 +- >> security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--- >> security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c | 1 + >> 4 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h >> index 11d7c0332207..72ac73ebc83e 100644 >> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h >> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h >> @@ -54,6 +54,16 @@ extern int ima_hash_algo __ro_after_init; >> extern int ima_sha1_idx __ro_after_init; >> extern int ima_hash_algo_idx __ro_after_init; >> extern int ima_extra_slots __ro_after_init; >> + >> +/* IMA hash algorithm description */ >> +struct ima_algo_desc { >> + struct crypto_shash *tfm; >> + enum hash_algo algo; >> +}; >> + >> +/* hash algorithms configured in IMA */ >> +extern struct ima_algo_desc *ima_algo_array; >> + >> extern int ima_appraise; >> extern struct tpm_chip *ima_tpm_chip; >> extern const char boot_aggregate_name[]; >> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c >> b/security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c >> index f3738b2c8bcd..3606931fc525 100644 >> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c >> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c >> @@ -57,11 +57,6 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(ahash_bufsize, "Maximum ahash buffer >> size"); >> static struct crypto_shash *ima_shash_tfm; >> static struct crypto_ahash *ima_ahash_tfm; >> >> -struct ima_algo_desc { >> - struct crypto_shash *tfm; >> - enum hash_algo algo; >> -}; >> - >> int ima_sha1_idx __ro_after_init; >> int ima_hash_algo_idx __ro_after_init; >> /* >> @@ -70,7 +65,7 @@ int ima_hash_algo_idx __ro_after_init; >> */ >> int ima_extra_slots __ro_after_init; >> >> -static struct ima_algo_desc *ima_algo_array; >> +struct ima_algo_desc *ima_algo_array; > > ima_algo_array should probably be defined as __ro_after_init, especially now > that the scope is changing. Hi Mimi, yes you're right, thanks. >> >> static int __init ima_init_ima_crypto(void) >> { >> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c >> index cd1683dad3bf..7d9c2ef5b86c 100644 >> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c >> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c >> @@ -116,9 +116,30 @@ void ima_putc(struct seq_file *m, void *data, int >> datalen) >> seq_putc(m, *(char *)data++); >> } >> >> +static struct dentry **ascii_securityfs_measurement_lists __ro_after_init; >> +static struct dentry **binary_securityfs_measurement_lists __ro_after_init; >> +static int securityfs_measurement_list_count __ro_after_init; >> + >> +static void lookup_algo_by_dentry(int *algo_idx, enum hash_algo *algo, >> + struct seq_file *m, struct dentry >> **dentry_list) > > Please rename the function without "_by_dentry". Consider naming the function > lookup_measurement_list_algo(). Instead of dentry_list, consider naming the > variable measurement_lists or just lists. What do you think of lookup_template_data_hash_algo()? >> +{ >> + struct dentry *dentry; >> + int i; >> + >> + dentry = file_dentry(m->file); >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < securityfs_measurement_list_count; i++) { >> + if (dentry == dentry_list[i]) { >> + *algo_idx = i; >> + *algo = ima_algo_array[i].algo; >> + break; >> + } >> + } >> +} >> + >> /* print format: >> * 32bit-le=pcr# >> - * char[20]=template digest >> + * char[n]=template digest >> * 32bit-le=template name size >> * char[n]=template name >> * [eventdata length] >> @@ -132,7 +153,15 @@ int ima_measurements_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) >> char *template_name; >> u32 pcr, namelen, template_data_len; /* temporary fields */ >> bool is_ima_template = false; >> - int i; >> + int i, algo_idx; >> + enum hash_algo algo; >> + >> + algo_idx = ima_sha1_idx; >> + algo = HASH_ALGO_SHA1; >> + >> + if (m->file != NULL) >> + lookup_algo_by_dentry(&algo_idx, &algo, m, >> + binary_securityfs_measurement_lists); >> >> /* get entry */ >> e = qe->entry; >> @@ -151,7 +180,7 @@ int ima_measurements_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) >> ima_putc(m, &pcr, sizeof(e->pcr)); >> >> /* 2nd: template digest */ >> - ima_putc(m, e->digests[ima_sha1_idx].digest, TPM_DIGEST_SIZE); >> + ima_putc(m, e->digests[algo_idx].digest, hash_digest_size[algo]); >> >> /* 3rd: template name size */ >> namelen = !ima_canonical_fmt ? strlen(template_name) : >> @@ -220,7 +249,15 @@ static int ima_ascii_measurements_show(struct seq_file >> *m, void *v) >> struct ima_queue_entry *qe = v; >> struct ima_template_entry *e; >> char *template_name; >> - int i; >> + int i, algo_idx; >> + enum hash_algo algo; > > The preferred variable definition ordering is reverse fir tree. Reverse the two > lines. Ok, I'll fix this also in create_securityfs_measurement_lists() where I'm noticing there is the same issue. >> + algo_idx = ima_sha1_idx; >> + algo = HASH_ALGO_SHA1; >> + >> + if (m->file != NULL) >> + lookup_algo_by_dentry(&algo_idx, &algo, m, >> + ascii_securityfs_measurement_lists); >> >> /* get entry */ >> e = qe->entry; >> @@ -233,8 +270,8 @@ static int ima_ascii_measurements_show(struct seq_file *m, >> void *v) >> /* 1st: PCR used (config option) */ >> seq_printf(m, "%2d ", e->pcr); >> >> - /* 2nd: SHA1 template hash */ >> - ima_print_digest(m, e->digests[ima_sha1_idx].digest, TPM_DIGEST_SIZE); >> + /* 2nd: template hash */ >> + ima_print_digest(m, e->digests[algo_idx].digest, >> hash_digest_size[algo]); >> >> /* 3th: template name */ >> seq_printf(m, " %s", template_name); >> @@ -379,6 +416,69 @@ static const struct seq_operations ima_policy_seqops = { >> }; >> #endif >> >> +static void __init remove_securityfs_measurement_lists(struct dentry >> **dentry_list) >> +{ >> + int i; >> + >> + if (dentry_list) { >> + for (i = 0; i < securityfs_measurement_list_count; i++) >> + securityfs_remove(dentry_list[i]); >> + >> + kfree(dentry_list); >> + } >> + >> + securityfs_measurement_list_count = 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int __init create_securityfs_measurement_lists(void) >> +{ >> + int i; >> + u16 algo; >> + char file_name[NAME_MAX + 1]; >> + struct dentry *dentry; >> + >> + securityfs_measurement_list_count = NR_BANKS(ima_tpm_chip); >> + >> + if (ima_sha1_idx >= NR_BANKS(ima_tpm_chip)) >> + securityfs_measurement_list_count++; >> + >> + ascii_securityfs_measurement_lists = >> kcalloc(securityfs_measurement_list_count, >> + sizeof(struct dentry *), >> GFP_KERNEL); > > Although lines > 80 characters are permitted, it isn't needed here. Like the > original ascii_runtime_measurements initialization, split the line after the > ascii_securityfs_measurement_lists variable name. Ok I will fix this and check for other changed/introduced lines > 80 characters where it is not necessary. >> + if (!ascii_securityfs_measurement_lists) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + binary_securityfs_measurement_lists = >> kcalloc(securityfs_measurement_list_count, >> + sizeof(struct dentry *), >> GFP_KERNEL); > > Same here. > > >> + if (!binary_securityfs_measurement_lists) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < securityfs_measurement_list_count; i++) { >> + algo = ima_algo_array[i].algo; >> + >> + sprintf(file_name, "ascii_runtime_measurements_%s", >> + hash_algo_name[algo]); >> + dentry = securityfs_create_file(file_name, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP, >> + ima_dir, NULL, >> + &ima_ascii_measurements_ops); >> + if (IS_ERR(dentry)) >> + return PTR_ERR(dentry); >> + >> + ascii_securityfs_measurement_lists[i] = dentry; >> + >> + sprintf(file_name, "binary_runtime_measurements_%s", >> + hash_algo_name[algo]); >> + dentry = securityfs_create_file(file_name, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP, >> + ima_dir, NULL, >> + &ima_measurements_ops); >> + if (IS_ERR(dentry)) >> + return PTR_ERR(dentry); >> + >> + binary_securityfs_measurement_lists[i] = dentry; >> + } >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> /* >> * ima_open_policy: sequentialize access to the policy file >> */ >> @@ -454,6 +554,9 @@ int __init ima_fs_init(void) >> { >> int ret; >> >> + ascii_securityfs_measurement_lists = NULL; >> + binary_securityfs_measurement_lists = NULL; >> + >> ima_dir = securityfs_create_dir("ima", integrity_dir); >> if (IS_ERR(ima_dir)) >> return PTR_ERR(ima_dir); >> @@ -465,19 +568,21 @@ int __init ima_fs_init(void) >> goto out; >> } >> >> + ret = create_securityfs_measurement_lists(); >> + if (ret != 0) >> + goto out; >> + >> binary_runtime_measurements = >> - securityfs_create_file("binary_runtime_measurements", >> - S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP, ima_dir, NULL, >> - &ima_measurements_ops); >> + securityfs_create_symlink("binary_runtime_measurements", >> ima_dir, >> + "binary_runtime_measurements_sha1", >> NULL); > >> 80 characters here and in a few other places.> > thanks, > > Mimi Thank you for your suggestions, Enrico > >> if (IS_ERR(binary_runtime_measurements)) { >> ret = PTR_ERR(binary_runtime_measurements); >> goto out; >> } >> >> ascii_runtime_measurements = >> - securityfs_create_file("ascii_runtime_measurements", >> - S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP, ima_dir, NULL, >> - &ima_ascii_measurements_ops); >> + securityfs_create_symlink("ascii_runtime_measurements", ima_dir, >> + "ascii_runtime_measurements_sha1", >> NULL); >> if (IS_ERR(ascii_runtime_measurements)) { >> ret = PTR_ERR(ascii_runtime_measurements); >> goto out; >> @@ -515,6 +620,8 @@ int __init ima_fs_init(void) >> securityfs_remove(runtime_measurements_count); >> securityfs_remove(ascii_runtime_measurements); >> securityfs_remove(binary_runtime_measurements); >> + remove_securityfs_measurement_lists(ascii_securityfs_measurement_lists); >> + remove_securityfs_measurement_lists(binary_securityfs_measurement_lists) >> ; >> securityfs_remove(ima_symlink); >> securityfs_remove(ima_dir); >> >> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c >> b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c >> index dadc1d138118..52e00332defe 100644 >> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c >> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c >> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ static int ima_dump_measurement_list(unsigned long >> *buffer_size, void **buffer, >> goto out; >> } >> >> + file.file = NULL; >> file.size = segment_size; >> file.read_pos = 0; >> file.count = sizeof(khdr); /* reserved space */ >> >> base-commit: 38aa3f5ac6d2de6b471ecb6e1cd878957ae7e8de >
On Wed, 2024-04-10 at 10:37 +0200, Enrico Bravi wrote: > > > +static struct dentry **ascii_securityfs_measurement_lists > > > __ro_after_init; > > > +static struct dentry **binary_securityfs_measurement_lists > > > __ro_after_init; > > > +static int securityfs_measurement_list_count __ro_after_init; > > > + > > > +static void lookup_algo_by_dentry(int *algo_idx, enum hash_algo *algo, > > > + struct seq_file *m, struct dentry > > > **dentry_list) > > > > Please rename the function without "_by_dentry". Consider naming the > > function > > lookup_measurement_list_algo(). Instead of dentry_list, consider naming the > > variable measurement_lists or just lists. > What do you think of lookup_template_data_hash_algo()? Sounds good. Mimi
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h index 11d7c0332207..72ac73ebc83e 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h @@ -54,6 +54,16 @@ extern int ima_hash_algo __ro_after_init; extern int ima_sha1_idx __ro_after_init; extern int ima_hash_algo_idx __ro_after_init; extern int ima_extra_slots __ro_after_init; + +/* IMA hash algorithm description */ +struct ima_algo_desc { + struct crypto_shash *tfm; + enum hash_algo algo; +}; + +/* hash algorithms configured in IMA */ +extern struct ima_algo_desc *ima_algo_array; + extern int ima_appraise; extern struct tpm_chip *ima_tpm_chip; extern const char boot_aggregate_name[]; diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c index f3738b2c8bcd..3606931fc525 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c @@ -57,11 +57,6 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(ahash_bufsize, "Maximum ahash buffer size"); static struct crypto_shash *ima_shash_tfm; static struct crypto_ahash *ima_ahash_tfm; -struct ima_algo_desc { - struct crypto_shash *tfm; - enum hash_algo algo; -}; - int ima_sha1_idx __ro_after_init; int ima_hash_algo_idx __ro_after_init; /* @@ -70,7 +65,7 @@ int ima_hash_algo_idx __ro_after_init; */ int ima_extra_slots __ro_after_init; -static struct ima_algo_desc *ima_algo_array; +struct ima_algo_desc *ima_algo_array; static int __init ima_init_ima_crypto(void) { diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c index cd1683dad3bf..7d9c2ef5b86c 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c @@ -116,9 +116,30 @@ void ima_putc(struct seq_file *m, void *data, int datalen) seq_putc(m, *(char *)data++); } +static struct dentry **ascii_securityfs_measurement_lists __ro_after_init; +static struct dentry **binary_securityfs_measurement_lists __ro_after_init; +static int securityfs_measurement_list_count __ro_after_init; + +static void lookup_algo_by_dentry(int *algo_idx, enum hash_algo *algo, + struct seq_file *m, struct dentry **dentry_list) +{ + struct dentry *dentry; + int i; + + dentry = file_dentry(m->file); + + for (i = 0; i < securityfs_measurement_list_count; i++) { + if (dentry == dentry_list[i]) { + *algo_idx = i; + *algo = ima_algo_array[i].algo; + break; + } + } +} + /* print format: * 32bit-le=pcr# - * char[20]=template digest + * char[n]=template digest * 32bit-le=template name size * char[n]=template name * [eventdata length] @@ -132,7 +153,15 @@ int ima_measurements_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) char *template_name; u32 pcr, namelen, template_data_len; /* temporary fields */ bool is_ima_template = false; - int i; + int i, algo_idx; + enum hash_algo algo; + + algo_idx = ima_sha1_idx; + algo = HASH_ALGO_SHA1; + + if (m->file != NULL) + lookup_algo_by_dentry(&algo_idx, &algo, m, + binary_securityfs_measurement_lists); /* get entry */ e = qe->entry; @@ -151,7 +180,7 @@ int ima_measurements_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) ima_putc(m, &pcr, sizeof(e->pcr)); /* 2nd: template digest */ - ima_putc(m, e->digests[ima_sha1_idx].digest, TPM_DIGEST_SIZE); + ima_putc(m, e->digests[algo_idx].digest, hash_digest_size[algo]); /* 3rd: template name size */ namelen = !ima_canonical_fmt ? strlen(template_name) : @@ -220,7 +249,15 @@ static int ima_ascii_measurements_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) struct ima_queue_entry *qe = v; struct ima_template_entry *e; char *template_name; - int i; + int i, algo_idx; + enum hash_algo algo; + + algo_idx = ima_sha1_idx; + algo = HASH_ALGO_SHA1; + + if (m->file != NULL) + lookup_algo_by_dentry(&algo_idx, &algo, m, + ascii_securityfs_measurement_lists); /* get entry */ e = qe->entry; @@ -233,8 +270,8 @@ static int ima_ascii_measurements_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) /* 1st: PCR used (config option) */ seq_printf(m, "%2d ", e->pcr); - /* 2nd: SHA1 template hash */ - ima_print_digest(m, e->digests[ima_sha1_idx].digest, TPM_DIGEST_SIZE); + /* 2nd: template hash */ + ima_print_digest(m, e->digests[algo_idx].digest, hash_digest_size[algo]); /* 3th: template name */ seq_printf(m, " %s", template_name); @@ -379,6 +416,69 @@ static const struct seq_operations ima_policy_seqops = { }; #endif +static void __init remove_securityfs_measurement_lists(struct dentry **dentry_list) +{ + int i; + + if (dentry_list) { + for (i = 0; i < securityfs_measurement_list_count; i++) + securityfs_remove(dentry_list[i]); + + kfree(dentry_list); + } + + securityfs_measurement_list_count = 0; +} + +static int __init create_securityfs_measurement_lists(void) +{ + int i; + u16 algo; + char file_name[NAME_MAX + 1]; + struct dentry *dentry; + + securityfs_measurement_list_count = NR_BANKS(ima_tpm_chip); + + if (ima_sha1_idx >= NR_BANKS(ima_tpm_chip)) + securityfs_measurement_list_count++; + + ascii_securityfs_measurement_lists = kcalloc(securityfs_measurement_list_count, + sizeof(struct dentry *), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!ascii_securityfs_measurement_lists) + return -ENOMEM; + + binary_securityfs_measurement_lists = kcalloc(securityfs_measurement_list_count, + sizeof(struct dentry *), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!binary_securityfs_measurement_lists) + return -ENOMEM; + + for (i = 0; i < securityfs_measurement_list_count; i++) { + algo = ima_algo_array[i].algo; + + sprintf(file_name, "ascii_runtime_measurements_%s", + hash_algo_name[algo]); + dentry = securityfs_create_file(file_name, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP, + ima_dir, NULL, + &ima_ascii_measurements_ops); + if (IS_ERR(dentry)) + return PTR_ERR(dentry); + + ascii_securityfs_measurement_lists[i] = dentry; + + sprintf(file_name, "binary_runtime_measurements_%s", + hash_algo_name[algo]); + dentry = securityfs_create_file(file_name, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP, + ima_dir, NULL, + &ima_measurements_ops); + if (IS_ERR(dentry)) + return PTR_ERR(dentry); + + binary_securityfs_measurement_lists[i] = dentry; + } + + return 0; +} + /* * ima_open_policy: sequentialize access to the policy file */ @@ -454,6 +554,9 @@ int __init ima_fs_init(void) { int ret; + ascii_securityfs_measurement_lists = NULL; + binary_securityfs_measurement_lists = NULL; + ima_dir = securityfs_create_dir("ima", integrity_dir); if (IS_ERR(ima_dir)) return PTR_ERR(ima_dir); @@ -465,19 +568,21 @@ int __init ima_fs_init(void) goto out; } + ret = create_securityfs_measurement_lists(); + if (ret != 0) + goto out; + binary_runtime_measurements = - securityfs_create_file("binary_runtime_measurements", - S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP, ima_dir, NULL, - &ima_measurements_ops); + securityfs_create_symlink("binary_runtime_measurements", ima_dir, + "binary_runtime_measurements_sha1", NULL); if (IS_ERR(binary_runtime_measurements)) { ret = PTR_ERR(binary_runtime_measurements); goto out; } ascii_runtime_measurements = - securityfs_create_file("ascii_runtime_measurements", - S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP, ima_dir, NULL, - &ima_ascii_measurements_ops); + securityfs_create_symlink("ascii_runtime_measurements", ima_dir, + "ascii_runtime_measurements_sha1", NULL); if (IS_ERR(ascii_runtime_measurements)) { ret = PTR_ERR(ascii_runtime_measurements); goto out; @@ -515,6 +620,8 @@ int __init ima_fs_init(void) securityfs_remove(runtime_measurements_count); securityfs_remove(ascii_runtime_measurements); securityfs_remove(binary_runtime_measurements); + remove_securityfs_measurement_lists(ascii_securityfs_measurement_lists); + remove_securityfs_measurement_lists(binary_securityfs_measurement_lists); securityfs_remove(ima_symlink); securityfs_remove(ima_dir); diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c index dadc1d138118..52e00332defe 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ static int ima_dump_measurement_list(unsigned long *buffer_size, void **buffer, goto out; } + file.file = NULL; file.size = segment_size; file.read_pos = 0; file.count = sizeof(khdr); /* reserved space */
The template hash showed by the ascii_runtime_measurements and binary_runtime_measurements is the one calculated using sha1 and there is no possibility to change this value, despite the fact that the template hash is calculated using the hash algorithms corresponding to all the PCR banks configured in the TPM. Add the support to retrieve the ima log with the template data hash calculated with a specific hash algorithm. Add a new file in the securityfs ima directory for each hash algo configured in a PCR bank of the TPM. Each new file has the name with the following structure: {binary, ascii}_runtime_measurements_<hash_algo_name> Legacy files are kept, to avoid breaking existing applications, but as symbolic links which point to {binary, ascii}_runtime_measurements_sha1 files. These two files are created even if a TPM chip is not detected or the sha1 bank is not configured in the TPM. As example, in the case a TPM chip is present and sha256 is the only configured PCR bank, the listing of the securityfs ima directory is the following: lr--r--r-- [...] ascii_runtime_measurements -> ascii_runtime_measurements_sha1 -r--r----- [...] ascii_runtime_measurements_sha1 -r--r----- [...] ascii_runtime_measurements_sha256 lr--r--r-- [...] binary_runtime_measurements -> binary_runtime_measurements_sha1 -r--r----- [...] binary_runtime_measurements_sha1 -r--r----- [...] binary_runtime_measurements_sha256 --w------- [...] policy -r--r----- [...] runtime_measurements_count -r--r----- [...] violations Signed-off-by: Enrico Bravi <enrico.bravi@polito.it> Signed-off-by: Silvia Sisinni <silvia.sisinni@polito.it> Reviewed-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com> --- v6: - Fixed format error when applying the patch. v5: - Added lookup_algo_by_dentry() function to select the hash algo during measurements dump. (suggested by Roberto) - Renamed remove_measurements_list_files() to remove_securityfs_measurement_lists() and create_measurements_list_files() to create_securityfs_measurement_lists(), and marked both as __init. (suggested by Mimi) - Renamed ima_ascii_measurements_files to ascii_securityfs_measurement_lists, ima_binary_measurements_files to binary_securityfs_measurement_lists and ima_measurements_files_count to securityfs_measurement_list_count, and marked them as __ro_after_init. (suggested by Mimi) - Added missing NULL assignment for file.file in ima_dump_measurement_list() during kexec. v4: - Added NULL check on m->file for measurements list dump called by ima_dump_measurement_list() on kexec. - Exported ima_algo_array and struct ima_algo_desc declaration from ima_crypto.c to access this information in ima_fs.c. - Added ima_measurements_files_count global variable to avoid extra logic each time the number of measurements file is needed. v3: - Added create_measurements_list_files function for measurements files creation. - Parameterized the remove_measurements_list_files function and add NULL check before freeing files' list. - Removed algorithm selection based on file name during ima_measurements_show and ima_ascii_measurements_show, and selecting it comparing dentry address. - Allocate also sha1 file following the schema {binary, ascii}_runtime_measurements_<hash_algo_name> and keep legacy files as symbolic links to those files. - Allocate measurements files lists even if a TPM chip is not detected, adding only sha1 files. v2: - Changed the behavior of configuring at boot time the template data hash algorithm. - Removed template data hash algo name prefix. - Removed ima_template_hash command line option. - Introducing a new file in the securityfs ima subdir for each PCR banks algorithm configured in the TPM. (suggested by Roberto) security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 10 +++ security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c | 7 +- security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--- security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c | 1 + 4 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) base-commit: 38aa3f5ac6d2de6b471ecb6e1cd878957ae7e8de