Message ID | 20240307174334.130407-1-thuth@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Sparc CPU naming and help text improvements | expand |
On 07/03/2024 18.43, Thomas Huth wrote: > The Sparc CPU naming and the corresponding help text is somewhat > confusing for the users. We should avoid spaces in the Names and > provide clear information to the users what can be passed to the > "-cpu" option. > While we're at it, also remove the "+" from two of the CPU names > since this character is now not allowed in device names anymore > (and was worked around with an ugly hack in qom/object.c so far). > > Thomas Huth (5): > target/sparc/cpu: Rename the CPU models with a "+" in their names > target/sparc/cpu: Avoid spaces by default in the CPU names > target/sparc/cpu: Improve the CPU help text > docs/system/target-sparc: Improve the Sparc documentation > docs/about: Deprecate the old "UltraSparc" CPU names that contain a > "+" Ping! Mark, Aryom, could you please comment on this patch series, too? Thanks, Thomas
On 15/04/2024 08:26, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 07/03/2024 18.43, Thomas Huth wrote: >> The Sparc CPU naming and the corresponding help text is somewhat >> confusing for the users. We should avoid spaces in the Names and >> provide clear information to the users what can be passed to the >> "-cpu" option. >> While we're at it, also remove the "+" from two of the CPU names >> since this character is now not allowed in device names anymore >> (and was worked around with an ugly hack in qom/object.c so far). >> >> Thomas Huth (5): >> target/sparc/cpu: Rename the CPU models with a "+" in their names >> target/sparc/cpu: Avoid spaces by default in the CPU names >> target/sparc/cpu: Improve the CPU help text >> docs/system/target-sparc: Improve the Sparc documentation >> docs/about: Deprecate the old "UltraSparc" CPU names that contain a >> "+" > > Ping! > > Mark, Aryom, could you please comment on this patch series, too? > > Thanks, > Thomas Done! I didn't realise that it was only patches 1 and 2 that were still outstanding until I tested the series, so I've replied to those separately. ATB, Mark.
On 18/04/2024 21:08, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: > On 15/04/2024 08:26, Thomas Huth wrote: > >> On 07/03/2024 18.43, Thomas Huth wrote: >>> The Sparc CPU naming and the corresponding help text is somewhat >>> confusing for the users. We should avoid spaces in the Names and >>> provide clear information to the users what can be passed to the >>> "-cpu" option. >>> While we're at it, also remove the "+" from two of the CPU names >>> since this character is now not allowed in device names anymore >>> (and was worked around with an ugly hack in qom/object.c so far). >>> >>> Thomas Huth (5): >>> target/sparc/cpu: Rename the CPU models with a "+" in their names >>> target/sparc/cpu: Avoid spaces by default in the CPU names >>> target/sparc/cpu: Improve the CPU help text >>> docs/system/target-sparc: Improve the Sparc documentation >>> docs/about: Deprecate the old "UltraSparc" CPU names that contain a >>> "+" >> >> Ping! >> >> Mark, Aryom, could you please comment on this patch series, too? >> >> Thanks, >> Thomas > > Done! I didn't realise that it was only patches 1 and 2 that were still outstanding > until I tested the series, so I've replied to those separately. Oops actually that's not quite right: looks like my git-am failed on patch 3 because it was already applied, but the remaining 2 patches are still relevant. I've just replied to those too. ATB, Mark.