mbox series

[v3,0/2] Fix two regression issues for QCA controllers

Message ID 1713564212-21725-1-git-send-email-quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series Fix two regression issues for QCA controllers | expand

Message

quic_zijuhu April 19, 2024, 10:03 p.m. UTC
This patch series are to fix below 2 regression issues for QCA controllers
1) BT can't be enabled once BT was ever enabled for QCA_QCA6390
2) BT can't be enabled after disable then warm reboot for QCA_QCA6390

the links for these issues are shown below:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218726
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-bluetooth/ea20bb9b-6b60-47fc-ae42-5eed918ad7b4@quicinc.com/T/#m73d6a71d2f454bb03588c66f3ef7912274d37c6f

Zijun Hu (2):
  Bluetooth: qca: Fix BT enable failure for QCA_QCA6390
  Bluetooth: qca: Fix BT enable failure for QCA_QCA6390 after disable
    then warm reboot

 drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Krzysztof Kozlowski April 20, 2024, 11:01 a.m. UTC | #1
On 20/04/2024 00:03, Zijun Hu wrote:
> This patch series are to fix below 2 regression issues for QCA controllers
> 1) BT can't be enabled once BT was ever enabled for QCA_QCA6390
> 2) BT can't be enabled after disable then warm reboot for QCA_QCA6390
> 
> the links for these issues are shown below:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218726
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-bluetooth/ea20


Provide changelog, either in cover letter or in individual patches under
---.

Do not attach (thread) your patchsets to some other threads (unrelated
or older versions). This buries them deep in the mailbox and might
interfere with applying entire sets.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Krzysztof Kozlowski April 22, 2024, 7:44 a.m. UTC | #2
On 20/04/2024 13:01, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/04/2024 00:03, Zijun Hu wrote:
>> This patch series are to fix below 2 regression issues for QCA controllers
>> 1) BT can't be enabled once BT was ever enabled for QCA_QCA6390
>> 2) BT can't be enabled after disable then warm reboot for QCA_QCA6390
>>
>> the links for these issues are shown below:
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218726
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-bluetooth/ea20
> 
> 
> Provide changelog, either in cover letter or in individual patches under
> ---.
> 
> Do not attach (thread) your patchsets to some other threads (unrelated
> or older versions). This buries them deep in the mailbox and might
> interfere with applying entire sets.
> 

How did you implement these two feedbacks?

v4 and v5 are still bad.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
quic_zijuhu April 22, 2024, 8:07 a.m. UTC | #3
On 4/22/2024 3:44 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/04/2024 13:01, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 20/04/2024 00:03, Zijun Hu wrote:
>>> This patch series are to fix below 2 regression issues for QCA controllers
>>> 1) BT can't be enabled once BT was ever enabled for QCA_QCA6390
>>> 2) BT can't be enabled after disable then warm reboot for QCA_QCA6390
>>>
>>> the links for these issues are shown below:
>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218726
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-bluetooth/ea20
>>
>>
>> Provide changelog, either in cover letter or in individual patches under
>> ---.
>>
>> Do not attach (thread) your patchsets to some other threads (unrelated
>> or older versions). This buries them deep in the mailbox and might
>> interfere with applying entire sets.
>>
> 
sorry, not notice this.
in order to send vN patch sets.
do i need to --in-reply-to  v(N-1) cover letter or v0 cover-letter ?

> How did you implement these two feedbacks?
> 
actually. i don't understand that two feedbacks so ask above questions.
> v4 and v5 are still bad.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Krzysztof Kozlowski April 22, 2024, 8:11 a.m. UTC | #4
On 22/04/2024 10:07, quic_zijuhu wrote:
> On 4/22/2024 3:44 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 20/04/2024 13:01, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 20/04/2024 00:03, Zijun Hu wrote:
>>>> This patch series are to fix below 2 regression issues for QCA controllers
>>>> 1) BT can't be enabled once BT was ever enabled for QCA_QCA6390
>>>> 2) BT can't be enabled after disable then warm reboot for QCA_QCA6390
>>>>
>>>> the links for these issues are shown below:
>>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218726
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-bluetooth/ea20
>>>
>>>
>>> Provide changelog, either in cover letter or in individual patches under
>>> ---.
>>>
>>> Do not attach (thread) your patchsets to some other threads (unrelated
>>> or older versions). This buries them deep in the mailbox and might
>>> interfere with applying entire sets.
>>>
>>
> sorry, not notice this.
> in order to send vN patch sets.
> do i need to --in-reply-to  v(N-1) cover letter or v0 cover-letter ?

No. b4 or git send-email handle everything correctly. Read go/upstream
before posting. If you ask such question, I doubt that you read it.
Eventually get someone experienced to help you with this.

> 
>> How did you implement these two feedbacks?
>>
> actually. i don't understand that two feedbacks so ask above questions.

You did not ask questions. You ignored that feedback and kept sending
patches, pushing for your point of view and responding to review with
unrelated sentences.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
quic_zijuhu April 22, 2024, 8:21 a.m. UTC | #5
On 4/22/2024 4:11 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 22/04/2024 10:07, quic_zijuhu wrote:
>> On 4/22/2024 3:44 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 20/04/2024 13:01, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 20/04/2024 00:03, Zijun Hu wrote:
>>>>> This patch series are to fix below 2 regression issues for QCA controllers
>>>>> 1) BT can't be enabled once BT was ever enabled for QCA_QCA6390
>>>>> 2) BT can't be enabled after disable then warm reboot for QCA_QCA6390
>>>>>
>>>>> the links for these issues are shown below:
>>>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218726
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-bluetooth/ea20
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Provide changelog, either in cover letter or in individual patches under
>>>> ---.
>>>>
>>>> Do not attach (thread) your patchsets to some other threads (unrelated
>>>> or older versions). This buries them deep in the mailbox and might
>>>> interfere with applying entire sets.
>>>>
>>>
>> sorry, not notice this.
>> in order to send vN patch sets.
>> do i need to --in-reply-to  v(N-1) cover letter or v0 cover-letter ?
> 
> No. b4 or git send-email handle everything correctly. Read go/upstream
> before posting. If you ask such question, I doubt that you read it.
> Eventually get someone experienced to help you with this.
> 
actually. i have read go/upstream many times. but b4 is hard for me to
use. so i always use git send-email to send patches and use thunderbird
to reply mails. we get someone to help.
>>
>>> How did you implement these two feedbacks?
>>>
>> actually. i don't understand that two feedbacks so ask above questions.
> 
> You did not ask questions. You ignored that feedback and kept sending
> patches, pushing for your point of view and responding to review with
> unrelated sentences.
> 
i now understood your feedbacks and concerns about format.
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>