mbox series

[GIT,PULL] md-6.10 20240502

Message ID B0747FE1-2648-42B0-AFDC-017BACB64588@fb.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [GIT,PULL] md-6.10 20240502 | expand

Pull-request

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/song/md.git tags/md-6.10-20240502

Message

Song Liu May 2, 2024, 10:01 p.m. UTC 
Hi Jens, 

Please consider pulling the following change for md-6.10 on top of your
for-6.10/block branch. This fixes an issue observed with dm-raid. 

Thanks,
Song
 


The following changes since commit 9d1110f99c253ccef82e480bfe9f38a12eb797a7:

  md: don't account sync_io if iostats of the disk is disabled (2024-04-08 21:15:46 -0700)

are available in the Git repository at:

  https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/song/md.git tags/md-6.10-20240502

for you to fetch changes up to f0e729af2eb6bee9eb58c4df1087f14ebaefe26b:

  md: fix resync softlockup when bitmap size is less than array size (2024-05-02 14:44:43 -0700)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Yu Kuai (1):
      md: fix resync softlockup when bitmap size is less than array size

 drivers/md/md-bitmap.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Jens Axboe May 2, 2024, 10:24 p.m. UTC | #1 
On 5/2/24 4:01 PM, Song Liu wrote:
> Hi Jens, 
> 
> Please consider pulling the following change for md-6.10 on top of your
> for-6.10/block branch. This fixes an issue observed with dm-raid. 

Thanks, pulled. Anything on the 64-bit craziness from last time? Just
want to make sure it isn't forgotten. Would be nice to have in for 6.10
so we don't end up with it in a release.
Song Liu May 2, 2024, 10:27 p.m. UTC | #2 
> On May 2, 2024, at 3:24 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
> 
> On 5/2/24 4:01 PM, Song Liu wrote:
>> Hi Jens, 
>> 
>> Please consider pulling the following change for md-6.10 on top of your
>> for-6.10/block branch. This fixes an issue observed with dm-raid.
> 
> Thanks, pulled. Anything on the 64-bit craziness from last time? Just
> want to make sure it isn't forgotten. Would be nice to have in for 6.10
> so we don't end up with it in a release.

It is not forgotten. We will come up with a fix/improvement soon. 

Thanks,
Song