diff mbox series

[RFT,v2,31/48] drm/panel: xinpeng-xpp055c272: Don't call unprepare+disable at shutdown/remove

Message ID 20240503143327.RFT.v2.31.Ib97e67a9877070698afbec4f8ede091b2bf89a1f@changeid (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series drm/panel: Remove most store/double-check of prepared/enabled state | expand

Commit Message

Doug Anderson May 3, 2024, 9:33 p.m. UTC
It's the responsibility of a correctly written DRM modeset driver to
call drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() at shutdown time and that should be
disabling / unpreparing the panel if needed. Panel drivers shouldn't
be calling these functions themselves.

A recent effort was made to fix as many DRM modeset drivers as
possible [1] [2] [3] and most drivers are fixed now.

A grep through mainline for compatible strings used by this driver
indicates that it is used by Rockchip boards. The Rockchip driver
appears to be correctly calling drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() so we can
remove the calls.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230901234015.566018-1-dianders@chromium.org
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230901234202.566951-1-dianders@chromium.org
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230921192749.1542462-1-dianders@chromium.org

Cc: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
---

Changes in v2:
- Only handle 1 panel per patch.
- Split removal of prepared/enabled from handling of remove/shutdown.

 .../gpu/drm/panel/panel-xinpeng-xpp055c272.c    | 17 -----------------
 1 file changed, 17 deletions(-)

Comments

Heiko Stuebner May 6, 2024, 4:31 p.m. UTC | #1
Am Freitag, 3. Mai 2024, 23:33:12 CEST schrieb Douglas Anderson:
> It's the responsibility of a correctly written DRM modeset driver to
> call drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() at shutdown time and that should be
> disabling / unpreparing the panel if needed. Panel drivers shouldn't
> be calling these functions themselves.
> 
> A recent effort was made to fix as many DRM modeset drivers as
> possible [1] [2] [3] and most drivers are fixed now.
> 
> A grep through mainline for compatible strings used by this driver
> indicates that it is used by Rockchip boards. The Rockchip driver
> appears to be correctly calling drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() so we can
> remove the calls.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230901234015.566018-1-dianders@chromium.org
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230901234202.566951-1-dianders@chromium.org
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230921192749.1542462-1-dianders@chromium.org
> 
> Cc: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>

the underlying setup (rockchip-drm with dw-dsi) as well as the
change itself is similar to the ltk050h3146w variant, so I don't
see how this should behave differently ;-)

Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-xinpeng-xpp055c272.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-xinpeng-xpp055c272.c
index 8262c00670cf..22a14006765e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-xinpeng-xpp055c272.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-xinpeng-xpp055c272.c
@@ -306,27 +306,11 @@  static int xpp055c272_probe(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void xpp055c272_shutdown(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
-{
-	struct xpp055c272 *ctx = mipi_dsi_get_drvdata(dsi);
-	int ret;
-
-	ret = drm_panel_unprepare(&ctx->panel);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		dev_err(&dsi->dev, "Failed to unprepare panel: %d\n", ret);
-
-	ret = drm_panel_disable(&ctx->panel);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		dev_err(&dsi->dev, "Failed to disable panel: %d\n", ret);
-}
-
 static void xpp055c272_remove(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
 {
 	struct xpp055c272 *ctx = mipi_dsi_get_drvdata(dsi);
 	int ret;
 
-	xpp055c272_shutdown(dsi);
-
 	ret = mipi_dsi_detach(dsi);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		dev_err(&dsi->dev, "Failed to detach from DSI host: %d\n", ret);
@@ -347,7 +331,6 @@  static struct mipi_dsi_driver xpp055c272_driver = {
 	},
 	.probe	= xpp055c272_probe,
 	.remove = xpp055c272_remove,
-	.shutdown = xpp055c272_shutdown,
 };
 module_mipi_dsi_driver(xpp055c272_driver);