Message ID | 20240412142120.220087-11-david@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | s390: PG_arch_1+folio cleanups for uv+hugetlb | expand |
On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 16:21:20 +0200 David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote: > Let's make it clearer that we are always working on folio flags and > never page flags of tail pages. please be a little more verbose, and explain what you are doing (i.e. converting usages of page flags to folio flags), not just why. > > Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> with a few extra words in the description: Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> > --- > arch/s390/mm/gmap.c | 4 ++-- > arch/s390/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 8 ++++---- > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c b/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c > index 0351cb139df4..9eea05cd93b7 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c > +++ b/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c > @@ -2648,7 +2648,7 @@ static int __s390_enable_skey_hugetlb(pte_t *pte, unsigned long addr, > { > pmd_t *pmd = (pmd_t *)pte; > unsigned long start, end; > - struct page *page = pmd_page(*pmd); > + struct folio *folio = page_folio(pmd_page(*pmd)); > > /* > * The write check makes sure we do not set a key on shared > @@ -2663,7 +2663,7 @@ static int __s390_enable_skey_hugetlb(pte_t *pte, unsigned long addr, > start = pmd_val(*pmd) & HPAGE_MASK; > end = start + HPAGE_SIZE - 1; > __storage_key_init_range(start, end); > - set_bit(PG_arch_1, &page->flags); > + set_bit(PG_arch_1, &folio->flags); > cond_resched(); > return 0; > } > diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/s390/mm/hugetlbpage.c > index c2e8242bd15d..a32047315f9a 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/mm/hugetlbpage.c > +++ b/arch/s390/mm/hugetlbpage.c > @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static inline pte_t __rste_to_pte(unsigned long rste) > > static void clear_huge_pte_skeys(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long rste) > { > - struct page *page; > + struct folio *folio; > unsigned long size, paddr; > > if (!mm_uses_skeys(mm) || > @@ -129,16 +129,16 @@ static void clear_huge_pte_skeys(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long rste) > return; > > if ((rste & _REGION_ENTRY_TYPE_MASK) == _REGION_ENTRY_TYPE_R3) { > - page = pud_page(__pud(rste)); > + folio = page_folio(pud_page(__pud(rste))); > size = PUD_SIZE; > paddr = rste & PUD_MASK; > } else { > - page = pmd_page(__pmd(rste)); > + folio = page_folio(pmd_page(__pmd(rste))); > size = PMD_SIZE; > paddr = rste & PMD_MASK; > } > > - if (!test_and_set_bit(PG_arch_1, &page->flags)) > + if (!test_and_set_bit(PG_arch_1, &folio->flags)) > __storage_key_init_range(paddr, paddr + size - 1); > } >
On 07.05.24 18:33, Claudio Imbrenda wrote: > On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 16:21:20 +0200 > David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Let's make it clearer that we are always working on folio flags and >> never page flags of tail pages. > > please be a little more verbose, and explain what you are doing (i.e. > converting usages of page flags to folio flags), not just why. > >> >> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> > > with a few extra words in the description: Let's make it clearer that we are always working on folio flags and never page flags of tail pages by converting remaining PG_arch_1 users that modify page->flags to modify folio->flags instead. No functional change intended, because we would always have worked with the head page (where page->flags corresponds to folio->flags) and never with tail pages. > > Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> Thanks for all the review!
On Wed, 8 May 2024 20:08:07 +0200 David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote: > On 07.05.24 18:33, Claudio Imbrenda wrote: > > On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 16:21:20 +0200 > > David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote: > > > >> Let's make it clearer that we are always working on folio flags and > >> never page flags of tail pages. > > > > please be a little more verbose, and explain what you are doing (i.e. > > converting usages of page flags to folio flags), not just why. > > > >> > >> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> > > > > with a few extra words in the description: > > Let's make it clearer that we are always working on folio flags and > never page flags of tail pages by converting remaining PG_arch_1 users > that modify page->flags to modify folio->flags instead. > > No functional change intended, because we would always have worked with > the head page (where page->flags corresponds to folio->flags) and never > with tail pages. this works, thanks! > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> > > Thanks for all the review! >
diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c b/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c index 0351cb139df4..9eea05cd93b7 100644 --- a/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c +++ b/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c @@ -2648,7 +2648,7 @@ static int __s390_enable_skey_hugetlb(pte_t *pte, unsigned long addr, { pmd_t *pmd = (pmd_t *)pte; unsigned long start, end; - struct page *page = pmd_page(*pmd); + struct folio *folio = page_folio(pmd_page(*pmd)); /* * The write check makes sure we do not set a key on shared @@ -2663,7 +2663,7 @@ static int __s390_enable_skey_hugetlb(pte_t *pte, unsigned long addr, start = pmd_val(*pmd) & HPAGE_MASK; end = start + HPAGE_SIZE - 1; __storage_key_init_range(start, end); - set_bit(PG_arch_1, &page->flags); + set_bit(PG_arch_1, &folio->flags); cond_resched(); return 0; } diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/s390/mm/hugetlbpage.c index c2e8242bd15d..a32047315f9a 100644 --- a/arch/s390/mm/hugetlbpage.c +++ b/arch/s390/mm/hugetlbpage.c @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static inline pte_t __rste_to_pte(unsigned long rste) static void clear_huge_pte_skeys(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long rste) { - struct page *page; + struct folio *folio; unsigned long size, paddr; if (!mm_uses_skeys(mm) || @@ -129,16 +129,16 @@ static void clear_huge_pte_skeys(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long rste) return; if ((rste & _REGION_ENTRY_TYPE_MASK) == _REGION_ENTRY_TYPE_R3) { - page = pud_page(__pud(rste)); + folio = page_folio(pud_page(__pud(rste))); size = PUD_SIZE; paddr = rste & PUD_MASK; } else { - page = pmd_page(__pmd(rste)); + folio = page_folio(pmd_page(__pmd(rste))); size = PMD_SIZE; paddr = rste & PMD_MASK; } - if (!test_and_set_bit(PG_arch_1, &page->flags)) + if (!test_and_set_bit(PG_arch_1, &folio->flags)) __storage_key_init_range(paddr, paddr + size - 1); }
Let's make it clearer that we are always working on folio flags and never page flags of tail pages. Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> --- arch/s390/mm/gmap.c | 4 ++-- arch/s390/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 8 ++++---- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)