Message ID | 20240605001629.4061937-1-andrii@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | libbpf: BTF field iterator | expand |
On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 05:16:24PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > Add BTF field (type and string fields, right now) iterator support instead of > using existing callback-based approaches, which make it harder to understand > and support BTF-processing code. > > v1->v2: > - t_cnt -> t_off_cnt, m_cnt -> m_off_cnt (Eduard); > - simpified code in linker.c (Jiri); > rfcv1->v1: > - check errors when initializing iterators (Jiri); > - split RFC patch into separate patches. > > Andrii Nakryiko (5): > libbpf: add BTF field iterator > libbpf: make use of BTF field iterator in BPF linker code > libbpf: make use of BTF field iterator in BTF handling code > bpftool: use BTF field iterator in btfgen > libbpf: remove callback-based type/string BTF field visitor helpers Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> jirka > > tools/bpf/bpftool/gen.c | 16 +- > tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 328 +++++++++++++++++++------------- > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h | 26 ++- > tools/lib/bpf/linker.c | 58 +++--- > 4 files changed, 262 insertions(+), 166 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.43.0 >
On 05/06/2024 09:52, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 05:16:24PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: >> Add BTF field (type and string fields, right now) iterator support instead of >> using existing callback-based approaches, which make it harder to understand >> and support BTF-processing code. >> >> v1->v2: >> - t_cnt -> t_off_cnt, m_cnt -> m_off_cnt (Eduard); >> - simpified code in linker.c (Jiri); >> rfcv1->v1: >> - check errors when initializing iterators (Jiri); >> - split RFC patch into separate patches. >> >> Andrii Nakryiko (5): >> libbpf: add BTF field iterator >> libbpf: make use of BTF field iterator in BPF linker code >> libbpf: make use of BTF field iterator in BTF handling code >> bpftool: use BTF field iterator in btfgen >> libbpf: remove callback-based type/string BTF field visitor helpers > > Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> > Retested v2, all looks good Tested-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> > jirka > >> >> tools/bpf/bpftool/gen.c | 16 +- >> tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 328 +++++++++++++++++++------------- >> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h | 26 ++- >> tools/lib/bpf/linker.c | 58 +++--- >> 4 files changed, 262 insertions(+), 166 deletions(-) >> >> -- >> 2.43.0 >>
Hello: This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>: On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 17:16:24 -0700 you wrote: > Add BTF field (type and string fields, right now) iterator support instead of > using existing callback-based approaches, which make it harder to understand > and support BTF-processing code. > > v1->v2: > - t_cnt -> t_off_cnt, m_cnt -> m_off_cnt (Eduard); > - simpified code in linker.c (Jiri); > rfcv1->v1: > - check errors when initializing iterators (Jiri); > - split RFC patch into separate patches. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [v2,bpf-next,1/5] libbpf: add BTF field iterator https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/68153bb2fffb - [v2,bpf-next,2/5] libbpf: make use of BTF field iterator in BPF linker code https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/2bce2c1cb2f0 - [v2,bpf-next,3/5] libbpf: make use of BTF field iterator in BTF handling code https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/c2641123696b - [v2,bpf-next,4/5] bpftool: use BTF field iterator in btfgen https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/e1a8630291fd - [v2,bpf-next,5/5] libbpf: remove callback-based type/string BTF field visitor helpers https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/072088704433 You are awesome, thank you!