Message ID | 20240606085234.565551-2-ms@dev.tdt.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | net: dsa: lantiq_gswip: code improvements | expand |
On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 10:52:22AM +0200, Martin Schiller wrote: > From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> > > The CPU port has to specify a phy-mode and either a phy or a fixed-link. > Since GSWIP is connected using a SoC internal protocol there's no PHY > involved. Add phy-mode = "internal" and a fixed-link to describe the > communication between the PMAC (Ethernet controller) and GSWIP switch. > > Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> > --- Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Long-term it would be good to also see a dt-schema conversion.
On 06/06/2024 10:52, Martin Schiller wrote: > From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> > > The CPU port has to specify a phy-mode and either a phy or a fixed-link. > Since GSWIP is connected using a SoC internal protocol there's no PHY > involved. Add phy-mode = "internal" and a fixed-link to describe the > communication between the PMAC (Ethernet controller) and GSWIP switch. You did nothing in the binding to describe them. You only extended example, which does not really matter if there is DTS with it. Best regards, Krzysztof
On 2024-06-10 10:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 06/06/2024 10:52, Martin Schiller wrote: >> From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> >> >> The CPU port has to specify a phy-mode and either a phy or a >> fixed-link. >> Since GSWIP is connected using a SoC internal protocol there's no PHY >> involved. Add phy-mode = "internal" and a fixed-link to describe the >> communication between the PMAC (Ethernet controller) and GSWIP switch. > > You did nothing in the binding to describe them. You only extended > example, which does not really matter if there is DTS with it. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof OK, so I'll update subject and commit message to signal that we only update the example code.
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 11:07:15AM +0200, Martin Schiller wrote: > On 2024-06-10 10:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 06/06/2024 10:52, Martin Schiller wrote: > > > From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> > > > > > > The CPU port has to specify a phy-mode and either a phy or a > > > fixed-link. > > > Since GSWIP is connected using a SoC internal protocol there's no PHY > > > involved. Add phy-mode = "internal" and a fixed-link to describe the > > > communication between the PMAC (Ethernet controller) and GSWIP switch. > > > > You did nothing in the binding to describe them. You only extended > > example, which does not really matter if there is DTS with it. > > > > Best regards, > > Krzysztof > > OK, so I'll update subject and commit message to signal that we only > update the example code. Either convert it or leave it alone. If you are worried about users' DTs being wrong due to copying a bad example, then you should care enough to do the conversion. Given the errors we find in examples, it's likely not the only problem. Rob
On 2024-06-11 00:05, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 11:07:15AM +0200, Martin Schiller wrote: >> On 2024-06-10 10:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> > On 06/06/2024 10:52, Martin Schiller wrote: >> > > From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> >> > > >> > > The CPU port has to specify a phy-mode and either a phy or a >> > > fixed-link. >> > > Since GSWIP is connected using a SoC internal protocol there's no PHY >> > > involved. Add phy-mode = "internal" and a fixed-link to describe the >> > > communication between the PMAC (Ethernet controller) and GSWIP switch. >> > >> > You did nothing in the binding to describe them. You only extended >> > example, which does not really matter if there is DTS with it. >> > >> > Best regards, >> > Krzysztof >> >> OK, so I'll update subject and commit message to signal that we only >> update the example code. > > Either convert it or leave it alone. If you are worried about users' > DTs > being wrong due to copying a bad example, then you should care enough > to > do the conversion. Given the errors we find in examples, it's likely > not the only problem. > > Rob Then I will convert the bindings to the new YAML format and send another update of this patch-set. Thanks, Martin
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/lantiq-gswip.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/lantiq-gswip.txt index 8bb1eff21cb1..e81ba0e0da0f 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/lantiq-gswip.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/lantiq-gswip.txt @@ -96,7 +96,13 @@ switch@e108000 { port@6 { reg = <0x6>; + phy-mode = "internal"; ethernet = <ð0>; + + fixed-link { + speed = <1000>; + full-duplex; + }; }; };