diff mbox series

[03/26] hw/ppc: Avoid using Monitor in xive_tctx_pic_print_info()

Message ID 20240610062105.49848-4-philmd@linaro.org (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series hw/ppc: Prefer HumanReadableText over Monitor | expand

Commit Message

Philippe Mathieu-Daudé June 10, 2024, 6:20 a.m. UTC
Replace Monitor API by HumanReadableText one.

Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
---
 include/hw/ppc/xive.h |  2 +-
 hw/intc/spapr_xive.c  |  7 ++++++-
 hw/intc/xive.c        | 11 ++++++-----
 hw/ppc/pnv.c          | 16 ++++++++++++++--
 4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Comments

Harsh Prateek Bora June 17, 2024, 10:19 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Phillipe,

On 6/10/24 11:50, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv.c b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
> index fa23b27a2b..5854358f65 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/pnv.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
> @@ -1223,7 +1223,13 @@ static void pnv_chip_power9_intc_destroy(PnvChip *chip, PowerPCCPU *cpu)
>   static void pnv_chip_power9_intc_print_info(PnvChip *chip, PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>                                               Monitor *mon)
>   {
> -    xive_tctx_pic_print_info(XIVE_TCTX(pnv_cpu_state(cpu)->intc), mon);
> +    g_autoptr(GString) buf = g_string_new("");
> +    g_autoptr(HumanReadableText) info = NULL;
> +
> +    xive_tctx_pic_print_info(XIVE_TCTX(pnv_cpu_state(cpu)->intc), buf);
> +
> +    info = human_readable_text_from_str(buf);
> +    monitor_puts(mon, info->human_readable_text);
>   }
>   
>   static void pnv_chip_power10_intc_create(PnvChip *chip, PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> @@ -1267,7 +1273,13 @@ static void pnv_chip_power10_intc_destroy(PnvChip *chip, PowerPCCPU *cpu)
>   static void pnv_chip_power10_intc_print_info(PnvChip *chip, PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>                                                Monitor *mon)
>   {
> -    xive_tctx_pic_print_info(XIVE_TCTX(pnv_cpu_state(cpu)->intc), mon);
> +    g_autoptr(GString) buf = g_string_new("");
> +    g_autoptr(HumanReadableText) info = NULL;
> +
> +    xive_tctx_pic_print_info(XIVE_TCTX(pnv_cpu_state(cpu)->intc), buf);
> +
> +    info = human_readable_text_from_str(buf);
> +    monitor_puts(mon, info->human_readable_text);
>   }
>   

We have an existing code duplication in above two routines which is 
getting worse with these multi-lines getting duplicated. Could _power9_ 
be changed to inline and called from _power10_ as well?

Thanks
Harsh
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé June 17, 2024, 11:23 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Harsh,

On 17/6/24 12:19, Harsh Prateek Bora wrote:
> On 6/10/24 11:50, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv.c b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
>> index fa23b27a2b..5854358f65 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/pnv.c
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
>> @@ -1223,7 +1223,13 @@ static void 
>> pnv_chip_power9_intc_destroy(PnvChip *chip, PowerPCCPU *cpu)
>>   static void pnv_chip_power9_intc_print_info(PnvChip *chip, 
>> PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>>                                               Monitor *mon)
>>   {
>> -    xive_tctx_pic_print_info(XIVE_TCTX(pnv_cpu_state(cpu)->intc), mon);
>> +    g_autoptr(GString) buf = g_string_new("");
>> +    g_autoptr(HumanReadableText) info = NULL;
>> +
>> +    xive_tctx_pic_print_info(XIVE_TCTX(pnv_cpu_state(cpu)->intc), buf);
>> +
>> +    info = human_readable_text_from_str(buf);
>> +    monitor_puts(mon, info->human_readable_text);
>>   }
>>   static void pnv_chip_power10_intc_create(PnvChip *chip, PowerPCCPU 
>> *cpu,
>> @@ -1267,7 +1273,13 @@ static void 
>> pnv_chip_power10_intc_destroy(PnvChip *chip, PowerPCCPU *cpu)
>>   static void pnv_chip_power10_intc_print_info(PnvChip *chip, 
>> PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>>                                                Monitor *mon)
>>   {
>> -    xive_tctx_pic_print_info(XIVE_TCTX(pnv_cpu_state(cpu)->intc), mon);
>> +    g_autoptr(GString) buf = g_string_new("");
>> +    g_autoptr(HumanReadableText) info = NULL;
>> +
>> +    xive_tctx_pic_print_info(XIVE_TCTX(pnv_cpu_state(cpu)->intc), buf);
>> +
>> +    info = human_readable_text_from_str(buf);
>> +    monitor_puts(mon, info->human_readable_text);
>>   }
> 
> We have an existing code duplication in above two routines which is 
> getting worse with these multi-lines getting duplicated. Could _power9_ 
> be changed to inline and called from _power10_ as well?

The duplicated lines get removed later. This series is a mere API
upgrade, the final diff is smaller (although harder to review, which
is why I did it with many trivial patches).

_power9_ / _power10_ simplification could be done but as a separate
patch from this series, since different matter IMHO.

Thanks for your reviews!

Phil.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/xive.h b/include/hw/ppc/xive.h
index f120874e0f..bc1cbad8a8 100644
--- a/include/hw/ppc/xive.h
+++ b/include/hw/ppc/xive.h
@@ -528,7 +528,7 @@  void xive_tctx_tm_write(XivePresenter *xptr, XiveTCTX *tctx, hwaddr offset,
 uint64_t xive_tctx_tm_read(XivePresenter *xptr, XiveTCTX *tctx, hwaddr offset,
                            unsigned size);
 
-void xive_tctx_pic_print_info(XiveTCTX *tctx, Monitor *mon);
+void xive_tctx_pic_print_info(XiveTCTX *tctx, GString *buf);
 Object *xive_tctx_create(Object *cpu, XivePresenter *xptr, Error **errp);
 void xive_tctx_reset(XiveTCTX *tctx);
 void xive_tctx_destroy(XiveTCTX *tctx);
diff --git a/hw/intc/spapr_xive.c b/hw/intc/spapr_xive.c
index d7e56bfb20..b7c12aa432 100644
--- a/hw/intc/spapr_xive.c
+++ b/hw/intc/spapr_xive.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ 
 #include "qemu/log.h"
 #include "qemu/module.h"
 #include "qapi/error.h"
+#include "qapi/type-helpers.h"
 #include "qemu/error-report.h"
 #include "target/ppc/cpu.h"
 #include "sysemu/cpus.h"
@@ -703,12 +704,16 @@  static void spapr_xive_print_info(SpaprInterruptController *intc, Monitor *mon)
 {
     SpaprXive *xive = SPAPR_XIVE(intc);
     CPUState *cs;
+    g_autoptr(GString) buf = g_string_new("");
+    g_autoptr(HumanReadableText) info = NULL;
 
     CPU_FOREACH(cs) {
         PowerPCCPU *cpu = POWERPC_CPU(cs);
 
-        xive_tctx_pic_print_info(spapr_cpu_state(cpu)->tctx, mon);
+        xive_tctx_pic_print_info(spapr_cpu_state(cpu)->tctx, buf);
     }
+    info = human_readable_text_from_str(buf);
+    monitor_puts(mon, info->human_readable_text);
 
     spapr_xive_pic_print_info(xive, mon);
 }
diff --git a/hw/intc/xive.c b/hw/intc/xive.c
index 057b308ae9..a0d7e7ca67 100644
--- a/hw/intc/xive.c
+++ b/hw/intc/xive.c
@@ -669,7 +669,7 @@  static const char * const xive_tctx_ring_names[] = {
          xpc->in_kernel ? xpc->in_kernel(xptr) : false;                 \
      }))
 
-void xive_tctx_pic_print_info(XiveTCTX *tctx, Monitor *mon)
+void xive_tctx_pic_print_info(XiveTCTX *tctx, GString *buf)
 {
     int cpu_index;
     int i;
@@ -693,13 +693,14 @@  void xive_tctx_pic_print_info(XiveTCTX *tctx, Monitor *mon)
         }
     }
 
-    monitor_printf(mon, "CPU[%04x]:   QW   NSR CPPR IPB LSMFB ACK# INC AGE PIPR"
-                   "  W2\n", cpu_index);
+    g_string_append_printf(buf, "CPU[%04x]:   "
+                           "QW   NSR CPPR IPB LSMFB ACK# INC AGE PIPR  W2\n",
+                           cpu_index);
 
     for (i = 0; i < XIVE_TM_RING_COUNT; i++) {
         char *s = xive_tctx_ring_print(&tctx->regs[i * XIVE_TM_RING_SIZE]);
-        monitor_printf(mon, "CPU[%04x]: %4s    %s\n", cpu_index,
-                       xive_tctx_ring_names[i], s);
+        g_string_append_printf(buf, "CPU[%04x]: %4s    %s\n",
+                               cpu_index, xive_tctx_ring_names[i], s);
         g_free(s);
     }
 }
diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv.c b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
index fa23b27a2b..5854358f65 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/pnv.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
@@ -1223,7 +1223,13 @@  static void pnv_chip_power9_intc_destroy(PnvChip *chip, PowerPCCPU *cpu)
 static void pnv_chip_power9_intc_print_info(PnvChip *chip, PowerPCCPU *cpu,
                                             Monitor *mon)
 {
-    xive_tctx_pic_print_info(XIVE_TCTX(pnv_cpu_state(cpu)->intc), mon);
+    g_autoptr(GString) buf = g_string_new("");
+    g_autoptr(HumanReadableText) info = NULL;
+
+    xive_tctx_pic_print_info(XIVE_TCTX(pnv_cpu_state(cpu)->intc), buf);
+
+    info = human_readable_text_from_str(buf);
+    monitor_puts(mon, info->human_readable_text);
 }
 
 static void pnv_chip_power10_intc_create(PnvChip *chip, PowerPCCPU *cpu,
@@ -1267,7 +1273,13 @@  static void pnv_chip_power10_intc_destroy(PnvChip *chip, PowerPCCPU *cpu)
 static void pnv_chip_power10_intc_print_info(PnvChip *chip, PowerPCCPU *cpu,
                                              Monitor *mon)
 {
-    xive_tctx_pic_print_info(XIVE_TCTX(pnv_cpu_state(cpu)->intc), mon);
+    g_autoptr(GString) buf = g_string_new("");
+    g_autoptr(HumanReadableText) info = NULL;
+
+    xive_tctx_pic_print_info(XIVE_TCTX(pnv_cpu_state(cpu)->intc), buf);
+
+    info = human_readable_text_from_str(buf);
+    monitor_puts(mon, info->human_readable_text);
 }
 
 /*