| Message ID | 20240624023101.369633-1-youwan@nfschina.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Handled Elsewhere, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v4] ACPI / amba: Drop unnecessary check for registered amba_dummy_clk | expand |
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 10:31:01AM +0800, Youwan Wang wrote: > amba_register_dummy_clk() is called only once from acpi_amba_init() > and acpi_amba_init() itself is called once during the initialisation. > amba_dummy_clk can't be initialised before this in any other code > path and hence the check for already registered amba_dummy_clk is > not necessary. Drop the same. > > Signed-off-by: Youwan Wang <youwan@nfschina.com> > Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> > Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> > --- > v1->v2->v3: Modify the commit log description > v3->v4: Update the commit message suggested by Sudeep; > Add Acked-by from Sudeep; > +Cc ARM64 maintainers Catalin and Will. I think I have told you many time now and you are missing to understand few basic stuff. So I suggest to give `Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst` under the kernel source a read and especially the section `The canonical patch format` Ideally this patch should have been v5 as you added Hanjun's Ack Also "v1->v2->v3: Modify the commit log description" makes no sense. The changelog should list all the deltas like: v4->v5: - <blah3 blah3> v3->v4: - <blah2 blah2> v2->v3: - <blah1 blah1> v1->v2: - <blah blah> Anyways, it is only for your learning and future references. -- Regards, Sudeep
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 10:31:01AM +0800, Youwan Wang wrote: > amba_register_dummy_clk() is called only once from acpi_amba_init() > and acpi_amba_init() itself is called once during the initialisation. > amba_dummy_clk can't be initialised before this in any other code > path and hence the check for already registered amba_dummy_clk is > not necessary. Drop the same. > > Signed-off-by: Youwan Wang <youwan@nfschina.com> > Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> > Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> > --- Hi Catalin, Can you please pick up this simple cleanup patch under ACPI changes ? It is very hard to follow the versions as it is messed up, but this version is good to take though. -- Regards, Sudeep
On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 10:31:01 +0800, Youwan Wang wrote: > amba_register_dummy_clk() is called only once from acpi_amba_init() > and acpi_amba_init() itself is called once during the initialisation. > amba_dummy_clk can't be initialised before this in any other code > path and hence the check for already registered amba_dummy_clk is > not necessary. Drop the same. > > > [...] Applied to arm64 (for-next/acpi), thanks! [1/1] ACPI / amba: Drop unnecessary check for registered amba_dummy_clk https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/bfe3f0df3e3c
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/amba.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/amba.c index 60be8ee1dbdc..ef438417cc80 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/amba.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/amba.c @@ -35,11 +35,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id amba_id_list[] = { static void amba_register_dummy_clk(void) { - static struct clk *amba_dummy_clk; - - /* If clock already registered */ - if (amba_dummy_clk) - return; + struct clk *amba_dummy_clk; amba_dummy_clk = clk_register_fixed_rate(NULL, "apb_pclk", NULL, 0, 0); clk_register_clkdev(amba_dummy_clk, "apb_pclk", NULL);