| Message ID | 20240705050213.1492515-4-clement.mathieu--drif@eviden.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | VT-d minor fixes | expand |
>-----Original Message----- >From: CLEMENT MATHIEU--DRIF <clement.mathieu--drif@eviden.com> >Subject: [PATCH v3 3/3] intel_iommu: make types match > >From: Clément Mathieu--Drif <clement.mathieu--drif@eviden.com> > >The 'level' field in vtd_iotlb_key is an unsigned integer. >We don't need to store level as an int in vtd_lookup_iotlb. > >Signed-off-by: Clément Mathieu--Drif <clement.mathieu--drif@eviden.com> >--- > hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c >index 37c21a0aec..be0cb39b5c 100644 >--- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c >+++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c >@@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ static VTDIOTLBEntry >*vtd_lookup_iotlb(IntelIOMMUState *s, uint16_t source_id, > { > struct vtd_iotlb_key key; > VTDIOTLBEntry *entry; >- int level; >+ unsigned level; Will it bring any issue if int is used? > > for (level = VTD_SL_PT_LEVEL; level < VTD_SL_PML4_LEVEL; level++) { > key.gfn = vtd_get_iotlb_gfn(addr, level); >-- >2.45.2
On 05/07/2024 10:51, Duan, Zhenzhong wrote: > Caution: External email. Do not open attachments or click links, unless this email comes from a known sender and you know the content is safe. > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: CLEMENT MATHIEU--DRIF <clement.mathieu--drif@eviden.com> >> Subject: [PATCH v3 3/3] intel_iommu: make types match >> >> From: Clément Mathieu--Drif <clement.mathieu--drif@eviden.com> >> >> The 'level' field in vtd_iotlb_key is an unsigned integer. >> We don't need to store level as an int in vtd_lookup_iotlb. >> >> Signed-off-by: Clément Mathieu--Drif <clement.mathieu--drif@eviden.com> >> --- >> hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c >> index 37c21a0aec..be0cb39b5c 100644 >> --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c >> +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c >> @@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ static VTDIOTLBEntry >> *vtd_lookup_iotlb(IntelIOMMUState *s, uint16_t source_id, >> { >> struct vtd_iotlb_key key; >> VTDIOTLBEntry *entry; >> - int level; >> + unsigned level; > Will it bring any issue if int is used? It shouldn't, but it might trigger static analyzer warnings. Do you want me to drop the patch? > >> for (level = VTD_SL_PT_LEVEL; level < VTD_SL_PML4_LEVEL; level++) { >> key.gfn = vtd_get_iotlb_gfn(addr, level); >> -- >> 2.45.2
On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 09:24:50AM +0000, CLEMENT MATHIEU--DRIF wrote: > > > On 05/07/2024 10:51, Duan, Zhenzhong wrote: > > Caution: External email. Do not open attachments or click links, unless this email comes from a known sender and you know the content is safe. > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: CLEMENT MATHIEU--DRIF <clement.mathieu--drif@eviden.com> > >> Subject: [PATCH v3 3/3] intel_iommu: make types match > >> > >> From: Clément Mathieu--Drif <clement.mathieu--drif@eviden.com> > >> > >> The 'level' field in vtd_iotlb_key is an unsigned integer. > >> We don't need to store level as an int in vtd_lookup_iotlb. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Clément Mathieu--Drif <clement.mathieu--drif@eviden.com> > >> --- > >> hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c > >> index 37c21a0aec..be0cb39b5c 100644 > >> --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c > >> +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c > >> @@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ static VTDIOTLBEntry > >> *vtd_lookup_iotlb(IntelIOMMUState *s, uint16_t source_id, > >> { > >> struct vtd_iotlb_key key; > >> VTDIOTLBEntry *entry; > >> - int level; > >> + unsigned level; > > Will it bring any issue if int is used? > It shouldn't, but it might trigger static analyzer warnings. > Do you want me to drop the patch? just write a better commit log. "Not an issue by itself, but using unsigned here seems cleaner". > > > >> for (level = VTD_SL_PT_LEVEL; level < VTD_SL_PML4_LEVEL; level++) { > >> key.gfn = vtd_get_iotlb_gfn(addr, level); > >> -- > >> 2.45.2
diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c index 37c21a0aec..be0cb39b5c 100644 --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c @@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ static VTDIOTLBEntry *vtd_lookup_iotlb(IntelIOMMUState *s, uint16_t source_id, { struct vtd_iotlb_key key; VTDIOTLBEntry *entry; - int level; + unsigned level; for (level = VTD_SL_PT_LEVEL; level < VTD_SL_PML4_LEVEL; level++) { key.gfn = vtd_get_iotlb_gfn(addr, level);