diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v2] selftests/bpf:fix a resource leak

Message ID 20240710015913.2554-1-zhujun2@cmss.chinamobile.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [bpf-next,v2] selftests/bpf:fix a resource leak | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
netdev/series_format success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/build_tools success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 16 of 16 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 29 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 fail Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 fail Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 fail Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18

Commit Message

Zhu Jun July 10, 2024, 1:59 a.m. UTC 
The requested resources should be closed before return
in main(), otherwise resource leak will occur

Signed-off-by: Zhu Jun <zhujun2@cmss.chinamobile.com>
---
Changes in v2:
 - check for cg_fd >= 0 and have just one out label

 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c | 11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Shuah Khan July 10, 2024, 3:30 p.m. UTC | #1 
On 7/9/24 19:59, Zhu Jun wrote:
> The requested resources should be closed before return
> in main(), otherwise resource leak will occur
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Jun <zhujun2@cmss.chinamobile.com>

How did you find this problem? Please give more details
on the tool used including the output from the tool.
> ---
> Changes in v2:
>   - check for cg_fd >= 0 and have just one out label
> 
>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c | 11 +++++++----
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
> index a34e95040994..285a9a714666 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
> @@ -2075,8 +2075,10 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>   
>   	if (!cg_fd) {
>   		cg_fd = cgroup_setup_and_join(CG_PATH);
> -		if (cg_fd < 0)
> -			return cg_fd;
> +		if (cg_fd < 0) {
> +			err = cg_fd;
> +			goto out;
> +		}

I don't this this improves the code - it makes it more complex.
If you want to improve this - add the same error message that
gets printed out for

case 'c':

in argument parsing.

fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: (%i) open cg path failed: %s\n",
                  cg_fd, optarg);
>   		cg_created = 1;
>   	}
>   
> @@ -2092,7 +2094,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>   	if (err) {
>   		fprintf(stderr, "populate program: (%s) %s\n",
>   			bpf_file, strerror(errno));
> -		return 1;
> +		goto out;

This looks good to me.

>   	}
>   	running = 1;
>   
> @@ -2109,7 +2111,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>   		free(options.whitelist);
>   	if (options.blacklist)
>   		free(options.blacklist);
> -	close(cg_fd);
> +	if (cg_fd >= 0)

Why is this check necessary?
> +		close(cg_fd);


>   	if (cg_created)
>   		cleanup_cgroup_environment();
>   	return err;

thanks,
-- Shuah
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
index a34e95040994..285a9a714666 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
@@ -2075,8 +2075,10 @@  int main(int argc, char **argv)
 
 	if (!cg_fd) {
 		cg_fd = cgroup_setup_and_join(CG_PATH);
-		if (cg_fd < 0)
-			return cg_fd;
+		if (cg_fd < 0) {
+			err = cg_fd;
+			goto out;
+		}
 		cg_created = 1;
 	}
 
@@ -2092,7 +2094,7 @@  int main(int argc, char **argv)
 	if (err) {
 		fprintf(stderr, "populate program: (%s) %s\n",
 			bpf_file, strerror(errno));
-		return 1;
+		goto out;
 	}
 	running = 1;
 
@@ -2109,7 +2111,8 @@  int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		free(options.whitelist);
 	if (options.blacklist)
 		free(options.blacklist);
-	close(cg_fd);
+	if (cg_fd >= 0)
+		close(cg_fd);
 	if (cg_created)
 		cleanup_cgroup_environment();
 	return err;