| Message ID | 20240712095116.3801586-1-ap420073@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | 59a931c5b732ca5fc2ca727f5a72aeabaafa85ec |
| Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [net] xdp: fix invalid wait context of page_pool_destroy() | expand |
On Fri, 12 Jul 2024 09:51:16 +0000 Taehee Yoo wrote: > Tested this patch with device memory TCP, which is not yet merged into the > net and net-next branch. That's fine, I'm pretty sure I've hit this with just page pools and XDP before.. LGTM: Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Hello: This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main) by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>: On Fri, 12 Jul 2024 09:51:16 +0000 you wrote: > If the driver uses a page pool, it creates a page pool with > page_pool_create(). > The reference count of page pool is 1 as default. > A page pool will be destroyed only when a reference count reaches 0. > page_pool_destroy() is used to destroy page pool, it decreases a > reference count. > When a page pool is destroyed, ->disconnect() is called, which is > mem_allocator_disconnect(). > This function internally acquires mutex_lock(). > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [net] xdp: fix invalid wait context of page_pool_destroy() https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/59a931c5b732 You are awesome, thank you!
diff --git a/net/core/xdp.c b/net/core/xdp.c index 022c12059cf2..bcc5551c6424 100644 --- a/net/core/xdp.c +++ b/net/core/xdp.c @@ -127,10 +127,8 @@ void xdp_unreg_mem_model(struct xdp_mem_info *mem) return; if (type == MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL) { - rcu_read_lock(); - xa = rhashtable_lookup(mem_id_ht, &id, mem_id_rht_params); + xa = rhashtable_lookup_fast(mem_id_ht, &id, mem_id_rht_params); page_pool_destroy(xa->page_pool); - rcu_read_unlock(); } } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xdp_unreg_mem_model);
If the driver uses a page pool, it creates a page pool with page_pool_create(). The reference count of page pool is 1 as default. A page pool will be destroyed only when a reference count reaches 0. page_pool_destroy() is used to destroy page pool, it decreases a reference count. When a page pool is destroyed, ->disconnect() is called, which is mem_allocator_disconnect(). This function internally acquires mutex_lock(). If the driver uses XDP, it registers a memory model with xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model(). The xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model() internally increases a page pool reference count if a memory model is a page pool. Now the reference count is 2. To destroy a page pool, the driver should call both page_pool_destroy() and xdp_unreg_mem_model(). The xdp_unreg_mem_model() internally calls page_pool_destroy(). Only page_pool_destroy() decreases a reference count. If a driver calls page_pool_destroy() then xdp_unreg_mem_model(), we will face an invalid wait context warning. Because xdp_unreg_mem_model() calls page_pool_destroy() with rcu_read_lock(). The page_pool_destroy() internally acquires mutex_lock(). Splat looks like: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.10.0-rc6+ #4 Tainted: G W ----------------------------- ethtool/1806 is trying to lock: ffffffff90387b90 (mem_id_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: mem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 3 locks held by ethtool/1806: stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 1806 Comm: ethtool Tainted: G W 6.10.0-rc6+ #4 f916f41f172891c800f2fed Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME Z690-P D4, BIOS 0603 11/01/2021 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x7e/0xc0 __lock_acquire+0x1681/0x4de0 ? _printk+0x64/0xe0 ? __pfx_mark_lock.part.0+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 lock_acquire+0x1b3/0x580 ? mem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150 ? __wake_up_klogd.part.0+0x16/0xc0 ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 ? dump_stack_lvl+0x91/0xc0 __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1690 ? mem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150 ? __pfx_prb_read_valid+0x10/0x10 ? mem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150 ? __pfx_llist_add_batch+0x10/0x10 ? console_unlock+0x193/0x1b0 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0xbe/0x140 ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10 ? tick_nohz_tick_stopped+0x16/0x90 ? __irq_work_queue_local+0x1e5/0x330 ? irq_work_queue+0x39/0x50 ? __wake_up_klogd.part.0+0x79/0xc0 ? mem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150 mem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150 ? __pfx_mem_allocator_disconnect+0x10/0x10 ? mark_held_locks+0xa5/0xf0 ? rcu_is_watching+0x11/0xb0 page_pool_release+0x36e/0x6d0 page_pool_destroy+0xd7/0x440 xdp_unreg_mem_model+0x1a7/0x2a0 ? __pfx_xdp_unreg_mem_model+0x10/0x10 ? kfree+0x125/0x370 ? bnxt_free_ring.isra.0+0x2eb/0x500 ? bnxt_free_mem+0x5ac/0x2500 xdp_rxq_info_unreg+0x4a/0xd0 bnxt_free_mem+0x1356/0x2500 bnxt_close_nic+0xf0/0x3b0 ? __pfx_bnxt_close_nic+0x10/0x10 ? ethnl_parse_bit+0x2c6/0x6d0 ? __pfx___nla_validate_parse+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_ethnl_parse_bit+0x10/0x10 bnxt_set_features+0x2a8/0x3e0 __netdev_update_features+0x4dc/0x1370 ? ethnl_parse_bitset+0x4ff/0x750 ? __pfx_ethnl_parse_bitset+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx___netdev_update_features+0x10/0x10 ? mark_held_locks+0xa5/0xf0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x42/0x70 ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x7d/0x110 ethnl_set_features+0x32d/0xa20 To fix this problem, it uses rhashtable_lookup_fast() instead of rhashtable_lookup() with rcu_read_lock(). Using xa without rcu_read_lock() here is safe. xa is freed by __xdp_mem_allocator_rcu_free() and this is called by call_rcu() of mem_xa_remove(). The mem_xa_remove() is called by page_pool_destroy() if a reference count reaches 0. The xa is already protected by the reference count mechanism well in the control plane. So removing rcu_read_lock() for page_pool_destroy() is safe. Fixes: c3f812cea0d7 ("page_pool: do not release pool until inflight == 0.") Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com> --- Tested this patch with device memory TCP, which is not yet merged into the net and net-next branch. net/core/xdp.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)